Developmental Psychology Class

Back to materials website


Developmental psychology

-a positive or negative change during life.

-Hall developed ‘dev. Psyc’

Developmental psychology starts at birth and ends at death.

Opinions as to the exact beginning:

1)conception

2)birth

3)before conception- i.e. family background, parents relationship, etc.

Nature vs. Nurture

Various areas of development:

1) Cognitive development

Thoughts/intellectual

Development of linguistics

Movement from more egocentric to less egocentric

2) Physical development

3) Motorical development

4) Emotional/social development

à each act is a combination of the areas above developments

Outlook

Universal models

Look at changes that occur to everyone at the same age without any relation to their respective culture

-establish norms

Norm: what most people do/undergo

Advantage: -ability to find problem

-ability to isolate positive and negative characteristics

Disadvantage: -might assume a negative trait in a person when not applicable

Individual differences/trends

-i.e. why is one kid more scared of strangers than another

External/environmental influences

-the study of the influence on person by surroundings

Developmental Psychology’s goals

1) To collect basic information on the development of a person (descriptive)

2) practical purposes

i.e. –to know when bedwetting is expected to stop.

-court: where is a kid best off? At mom’s care/dad’s care/foster home

Descriptive process

1)collect data from the group

2)analyze info: i.e.: if most kids start speaking at the same time, it is probably genetic

3)foresee: what will happen in future cases

4)influence: using tools to fix a problem

Basic Dev. Psyc. Question

Nature vs. nurture


à no clear answer

Opinions:

Nature

-Behaviors is only influenced by genes/biology

-John Lock-baby=clean slate – life chisels at it

Nurture

-Behavior infl. By nurture: nutrition/right upbringing

-Rousseau – baby=intrinsically good, but corrupted by society

--

There are things influenced more by nature and some more by nurture

Way to check:

-identical twins separated at birth and brought up in different surroundings

-2 people of different genes grow up in same surrounding

Anthropology: children grown in same surroundings vs. others

Studies of twins/adoptee

-The attempt to study the relationships between 2 people with some commonalities (genes/upbringing)


-1---0---1

-1 –opposite relationship b/w the compared individuals (i.e. one smart, one not)

0 –no comparable relationship b/w compared ind. (therefore, not genetic)

1 –equal relationship b/w/ compared ind. (i.e. both smart)

Example:

1)identical twins grew up in 1)different 2)same surrounding

2) 2 people w/o family relation who grew up 1)together 2)separately


àproof that genetics do not have exclusive influence

Various factors of development

1)maturity

2)growth

3)learned

Maturity

-cellular maturity that allow for new action

ài.e. cells mature at certain age to allow for walking

-everyone had a biological clock that control maturity of cells

-i.e. first baby crawls, then walks.

Growth

# of cells in an organ increases

-unlike maturity, which refers to size/ability of cells

-influence by both genes/environment

à could also be infl. By emotional environment

-Growth not necessity for maturity

-Maturity not necessity for growth

Learned

-Change in behavior infl. By language

-i.e. leaning a language

Relation b/w maturity/growth/learn

-maturity –necessity for for learn

-there are rare cases where leaning infl. Maturity

How to collect data

1)Observation

2)closed/open questionnaire

Closed: given a range of answers that the person has to choose

Open: asking a free-range question

3)physiological

-observe things that reflect the kid feels/thing

-brain scans


Focus of Dev. Psyc.

1)Developmental trends

2)Individual difference

3)psychopathy

Developmental trends

Observe how the child is developing mentally/physically

-adolescence – end of mental development

Individual difference

What do kids have in difference?

How Come

What outcome will it have?

What can be derived?

How could it be fixed if necessary?

Focus here is on individual (‘developmental trends’ focus on group – they do not oppose each other – just different focus.)

Psychopathic development

The study of unhealthy /not-normal development

-necessity of defining normal, in order to compare normal to not-normal

-In our class, since the focus is on development of kids, psychopathy is only referring to either kids developing wrongly or parents upbringing kids in bad ways

Infancy

Babies were thought to be confused and helpless

-Watson: babies have no response/reflex/feeling

studies show:

In Reality:

-Babies can follow sounds/objects first day after birth

-Recognize mom’s voiced immediately

-sound very developed

-vision underdeveloped àcan only recognize colors after 2 months

--

During first few months, baby strives to attain:

1)social contact

2)food

3)avoiding harmful stimulants

Things that help us find out what the babies know

1)Suck

2)Look

3)Focus on an object

suck

Babies suck faster at things that they like better

Focus on an object

Babies look at new objects, then turn away once it is familiar to them

Habituates – regular (and uninteresting)

Dishabituates – the regular object no longer is regular

Piaget –child psych

-did research on child development

2 of his famous tests

1) Had 2 identical cups with identical amount of liquid. Each with a different color.

The sample kid was asked which was fuller – he answered that it was equal. Then 1 cup’s liquid was moved into a tall glass When asked which had more liquid:

6 year old: the taller

7 year old: not sure

8 year old: same

2)train goes by – one area of tracks are blocked by a screen. When screen is lifted, there is a box on the tracks

-baby looks in confusion

àwe use baby’s vision to see h.m. he knows


Terminology

Qualitative change
a transformation/ improvement based on the sum of experiences (as opposed to physical/cognitive improvement)
Quantitative change Change in numbers
Behavioral reorganization A new way which a developing person organizes his skills/abilities
Orderly Logical flow of development which builds on the previous stage, and paves the way for the new stage
Cumulative Each stage includes all previous stages, including itself (the new stage)
Directional The direction of the development should always be towards a more complicated stage
Development
The process of Quantitative, Qualitative change and Behavioral reorganization that are orderly, cumulative and directional

Types of Development

Normative development
-A development found in most kids. Therefore, this specific development is defined as normal.

-numbers used in statistics of normative development is usually only an average

Individual development
-A development found in individual kids, but not in most kids

àthis leads to personal differences, and expertise that a specific kid has in a given task

à

2 kinds of individual differences
1)most common form of Individual Development is the variations in when the specific kid reached a developmental stage
2)Personal experiences which influence a kid’s development, and therefore contribute to his expertise in a task or his personality



Case study

Parent holds a napkin in mouth and waves head (w/ napkin in mouth) in front of:

6 months old baby

Concentrates on napkin or parent’s face

àtakes napkin out of mouth and observes it (through his senses, i.e. touch/tongue)

10 months old baby

Can concentrate on both, therefore understanding the illogical scene, thus, the baby starts to smile/laugh.

àis able to follow the parent’s movements

àtakes napkin out of mouth of parent and replaces it

Analysis of case study

-Both babies have same physical/anatomic abilities

The difference is Qualitative

Qualitative change -a transformation based on the sum of experiences

6 mo. Baby

-not able to concentrate on both mom and napkin -only at one at a time

à therefore not seeing that the mom is trying to play

-can concentrate on both mom and napkin

àbecause baby remembers that the mom usually does not have napkin in mouth

àthis baby knows that she can take napkin away from mom and replace it, thus returning to the original scene
(remembering recent events and comparing them to future possible events)

àthe fundamental qualitative change took place in the memory of the baby

Behavioral reorganization A new way which a developing person organizes his skills/abilities

-the older baby is now able not only to remember, but to coordinate b/w

1)her past memories,

2)as past experiences and future expectations


Summery:

3 factors play role in psychological development:

1) Genes

2) Past development

3) Present environment

Evolution/Natural Selection

Darwin – 1809-1882

-Natural selection: when a certain variance in genes put a specific animal in an advantage in terms of survival. He will have more chances of surviving and spreading it’s genes than the animals w/o this advantage àeventually this specific gene will spread to a big group of the species and might overtake it àEvolution

The 3 factors also necessary in evolution

Summery:

3 factors play role in evolution:

1) Genes

2) Past development

3) Present environment

Genes in psychology:

Psychologists are interested to discover which behaviors genes cause, and under which environmental conditions those genes are turned on by.

àthe psycho. want to study it to know which environments to avoid or encourage in the specific kids.

How do kids understand symbols? –movie

Symbol-something that is meant to rep. something else

Experiment #1

-a model of a room is shown to a kid. A small doll is hidden in the model room in front of the kid. Then kid told that the experimenter is doing the same to the real-life room (to which the model-room is based after.) ànot in front of the kid, the experimenter hides other doll in the place corresponding to the place in the model-room where the doll was hidden.

Results

-2½ kid can’t clearly correspond the model room w/ the real room àtrial and error until she finds doll

-3 year old kid finds it immediately, thus having the ability to correspond b/w model and actual room

Experiment #2

Floor of crib, -one half has a pattern; the other half is see-through to below where a similar pattern is laid.

Results

-6 months old will claw across crib, not having depth perception

-8 months old won’t craw over the see-through

Outgoing/secluding

Some of kids: outgoing/others secluding

àthis is a fundamental diff. among humans

àeven though it is very much genetic, this behavior could be modified

-another factor – outgoing mom = outgoing kids

Psychopathic/verbal skills also genetic

->Environment determines w/ genes will activate

à2-3 yr-old only can see his own view àcan’t be empathical

Class, Nov 6, 2000

3 kinds of development:

3 structures of which baby b/c adult
Quantitative More # of same:

àmore steps/more memory

Qualitative Yesterday: leg movement àtoday: steps
Reorganization W/ walking comes fear àreorganization?

-Different theories allot different amounts of each structure in each stage of development

-Dev. Psych needs theory in order to experiment àneeds to experiment a theory

àevery theory focuses on a different element of behavior

2 things could be focused on in research:

1) Observable behavior (cognitive/intellectual)

2) Internal experience (social/emotional)

Cognitive theories
Information-processing Mental development
-The attempt to compare kid’s thought process to computer

àhow process/remember data

Attention selector

Perceptionàshort term memory.àl/t mem

-this theory focuses mostly on quantity/cognitive development

àmore and more ability

->culture irrelevant to development

Piaget

-normative cognitive development

-how do kids perceive their surrounding?

->at certain point, minds are better

changes occur in age:

2/7/11-12

à qualitative theory

-this theory is based on perception - not ability


Ways to get info: experiment/observation

Experiment

For an experiment, you need an hypothesis

àusually supported by facts/research

:

Example

-babies tend to focus on hairline, but not on the whole face

Question: Why?

Hypothesis the Color difference b/e hair/skin attracts them (?)

Experiment:

2 groups of babies chosen randomly

1 group shown face w/ color difference b/w hair/skin color

2nd group shown face w/o color difference b/w hair/skin color

-Laboratory experiments allow for carefully controlled experiment àmore systematic

Problem: people behave differently in lab than in reality

àKids can control temptations better

Ecological Validly: to what extent can on apply conclusion of a lab to real life?

Problems:

1) There are some experiments beyond lab

Ethical: can’t abuse kids/expose to pain

Practical: can’t repeat all daily experiences in an experiment

2) Conclusion can’t apply to everything

-not everything is relevant to daily life:

    Example: Watson (1928) made kids scared of rats by exposing them to loud noise every time a rat went by

      àdoesn’t mean that whoever that is exposed to rat was exposed to those conditions.


Observation

‘Naturalistic Observation’

-Observing on Animal/humans in his natural setting in order to learn natural behavior

àSometimes, natural scenarios are synthesized in a lab: i.e. an playground in the lab

Ethology’ – the study of behavior through observation of animal in his natural habitat

    àExperimenters writes down qualitative observations i.e. change in mood, actions, etc

Positive Correlation: 2 variable in which are is directly dependent on the others

    ài.e. dependent/independent variable

àjust b/c something occurs simultaneously does not that there is a positive correlation

Example

Old study showed P.c. b/w # stocks and # babies born

àthis is not P.C. b/c/ we do not for sure that # of storks leads to higher # of babies

àLater, it was shown that there is a p.c. b/w birth # and pop. size

àCrowded neighborhood=many chimneys = many storks

Natural Experiment

-an experiment which the experimenter can’t choose random people

Example: comparing rich to poor

Example: hypothesis: age of kid influences tension in family

Experiment:

Choose family w/ similar economy/job tension/marital satisfaction

      àif tension occurs in families w/ teens àage of kids is a decisive factor of the tension

Combining Observations/Experiments

Observations: monkeys bond to mom

Experiment

Thesis: not only for food but also for security

Example: baby monkeys who were separated from mom àpreferred ‘adopted’ mom from towels cloth that did not give food rather than from strings that gave string.

(Harlow+Harlow 1966)

Other Observational studies

-ways to study effects of age of entry into nursery

Longitudinal study -studies of an effect over time

-The experiment will choose people w/ similar backgrounds/happiness/job stress/etc.

-after set # of years, they study cognitive/Emotional diff.

Problem: shows qualitative change w/I each group, not the process

Cross-sectional study

-compare kids of various ages at a given pt.

Example:

Take a group of kids 1-14 yrs old

½ of them –infancy in nursery

½ of them - infancy @ home

    -> can compare other factors involved in infancy upbringing

Problems: shows average, but not the individual difference

Accelerated Longitudinal designs

-ways to study a long-term experiment faster

Example: instead of studying the aforementioned group for 14 years, you get 4 groups

1-4-7-11-14 yrs olds (3 yr intervals b/w each group)

àif @ the end of the interval, a specific group is where the next-older group was 3 years ago, one can assume it is a developmental continuum




Social/Emotional theories
Social learning (Behaviorism)
Based on behavioral models

àObserved behaviors

-Assumption: behavior could be engineered through upbringing

àdid not agree w/ genes affecting behavior

-The Americans had fear of theories of genetics (i.e. Nazi)

Psychoanalysis

Freud

Psychoanalytical theory

-this theory focused on unconscious problems which cause psychopathism

3 layers of the unconsciousness

Id –the unconscious layer which seeks to fulfill instinctive acts/pleasure

àPleasure –libido (i.e. sexual)

Ego (also called I)–the layer which seeks to fulfill the instinctive acts in legitimate way

-->restrains the id

àour way to process reality -cognitive

Superego – the layer which has the value system –consciousness

-affected by upbringing/parents/culture

-the defense-system is b/w the Id/Ego

-When conflict b/w id/superego is too hard, a symptom occurs, ài.e. hysteria/depression

Individual personality development

-Stages of developed in a specific order/stages

àstages revolve around satisfying instinctive drives of some parts of the body

àeach stage occurs at roughly same age in everyone

Personality: h.m/to what degree each Drive is satisfied or repressed

Psychosexual theory

-stages in sexual development

-Oral –based on breastfeeding

-Anal- toilet training

-Phallic –connection to relationships/sexuality

-Oedipalend of Phallic stage: connection to mom/rejection of dad

-Genital –focus on genitals

Genital stage –lasts for the rest of life.

Fixation: when kid not able to fix problems of that stage

àSymbolically, the kid will relive stage throughout life.

Examples of fixation on specific stages:

-Oral –lack of independency

-Anal- control on people

-Phallic –exhibitionism – I am the most beautiful/worries about perceptions of others

-Oedipalhating dad – loving mom

Freud: Healthy life:

-fixed sexual life (heterosexual/

-fixed income w/ healthy job (i.e. socially acceptable)

-initially, Freud spoke of intrinsic drives influencing personal dev.

àLater, spoke of more individual conditions affecting development

Psycho-social

Erikson

-Also lists qualitative different stages which person has to go through, during lifetime

àUnlike Freud, Erikson said that a person can’t be fixed on one stage

àeach person solves stage –some better/some worse

-Erikson’s stages –more inclusive than Freud

Stage

Details

Age

Basic Trust vs. Basic mistrust

1 yr

Autonomy vs. shame/doubt

2 yrs

Initiation vs. guilt

i.e. what you do in playground

4 yrs

Industry vs. interiority

i.e. learning techniques

6-11 yrs

Identity vs. confusion of roles

-adolescence

11-16 yrs

Intimacy vs. isolation

Young adults

Fertility vs. ‘congealation’

-can you make family/job

Adults/generic

Ego-completion vs. despair

Are you happy or sad w/ life’s achievements

Old


Freud’s notions

Mental Apparatus

-Freud Believed that Everything in psychology is bound to be discovered by logic\scientific research

Science=morality

-the more science we know, the better the world will be.

-i.e. the better/more crops we know to grow, the less hunger there will be.

à we do not believe that after WWII

Kinds of theories

-Developments happened in stages

-Developments happened in linear way

Kagan

-Reinforced childhood experience is a huge factor in behavior

Treatment

Find out:

*why did people pick specifically those friends/partners

*why do they act the way they do?

àmake those things conscious and perhaps make a dissonance

àmight help change

Chapter 2, 68-72 notes

Kids need attention during infancy

àif kid taken from parents b/f 4 àvery traumatic

-kids who grow up in establishments –negative effect

àlack of stimulus/care during infancy

-Culture has effect on psychological development

Example:

-in Japanese culture:

-kids seen as intrinsically independency àneeds to be made ASAP

-self control

-respect

-mom: never leaves àeven for shopping

-dad leaves parenthood for mom

àway different from North American culture

Relations

Community/family/social group/socioeconomic level

Context –our surroundings

Question h.m. does our context influence our development?

Answer:

Freud/Wilmford: baby needs human surrounding (context) in order to have a normative development

Problem: orphanage: baby does not have a long-range relationship ài.e. change of workers; not enough personal care.

àbaby feels that what he indicates is meaningless (i.e. signs of tiredness might be ignored b/c ‘it is time to be fed’)

àmight lead to signs of autism

Context: within a relationship during development, which helps infant develop

àinfant needs a constant relationship, i.e. mom

àcontext could also be a cultural context

Social context

Americans –more eye contact that Japanese

àJapan has more structured society than America

-parents work more/spent more time @ home

Question: how does that effect the kid’s context?

àParent’s choices are depended on culture

Ecological context -Bronfenbrener


Bronfenbrener

Made a pie to show person’s development factors:

Biological genes

-Genetic predispositions of the infant – help the infant survive

-i.e. knows how to =suck/seeks relationship w/ adults/turns head if airway is blocked/tendency to be sociable

*whatever one wants to teach a baby, it has to relate to its inherent survival skills

àsome babies more active; some are more shy/caution

àSome: novelty seeker/some not

-all: personal gene variance

-Inside of pie-chart

Immediate surroundings:

-Family/toys/school/nursery/teachers/etc.

->thing that the kid comes in direct contact with

-Microsystems

-in America, grandparents are less part of the family micro-system that in Israel

ànext circle in the pie

Socioeconomic

-which quality on education

-economic situation of community

Example: the employer of parent could effect parent’s behavior on the kid

-broader than immediate surroundings à Macrosystems

ànext circle in the pie

Cultural

Socially acceptable positions/values

->last circle in the pie


Biological effect on psychological development

The fundamental effect of genes on personal development

  1. Evolutionary genetic ‘inheritance’
  2. Personal genetic ‘inheritance’
  3. Results of genes interacting w/ environment

Evolutionary genetic ‘inheritance’


-babies are born with intrinsic characteristics intrinsic to:

1) All mammals

2) All primates

3) All humans

Mammals- breastfeeding –ability to get food from mom

Primates- seek social stimulus / strong connections to parents

Humans- speech

Genes

Influence our Development

àsets schedule for How/Whne we develop

ài.e. what age we start walking/talking

-human genes drive to try to inspect surroundings/solve problems

àalso common to several more sophisticated primates

Human’s genetic curiosity

-Most kids, by the age of 4 speak fluently 9chimps can hardly learn signs/symbols)

à18 months, the baby starts to learn to speak

    àcan only understand some concepts/sentence structures

-only at adolescence can the person understand fully concepts

Conclusion:

The ability to learn a specific thing (i.e. speech) =genes

What we in actuality will learn (i.e. speech/which language) =development

*social relations are also somewhat genetic:

Genes help:

1)baby know how to get needed relationship: i.e. knows how/when to cry/smile by himself

2)Help kid want to play w/ kids his age @ playground

3) Adolescence: intimate relationships

Personal genetic ‘inheritance’

-not all genetic influence are common to all humanity

ài.e. in a change of environment, the ones w/ the genes better to that environment survive

àthe ones w/ genes which are not so adaptable to that climate won’t survive

Example in psychological Development:

  1. a kid that has Downs syndrome (Personal genetic ‘inheritance’) –will indirectly cause the kid be treated a certain way àeffect on upbringing/job expectation/education/etc
  2. some psychologists think that things like cautiousness/activity level is genetic

    -which will indirectly effect how he is treated in society

àsome babies more active; some are more shy/caution

àSome: novelty seeker/some not

-all: personal gene variance

Goodness of fit

How parent/kid relationship is influenced by genes

àif kid’s genes fit’s parents’ action/lifestyle –goodness of fit is high

àof goodness of fit is low – tension

àsometimes, b/c of goodness of fit , kid might bond w/ a parent better than w/ the other

Genes interacting with environment

-i.e. effect of pregnant mom smoking, on kid

Question:

To what degree do genes hinder environment’s effect on certain areas of the body?

Answer

Channeling

-Genetic tendencies which are channeled past the environmental effects

àkid won’t walk sooner if you try to teach him! (except in extreme cases)

Weddington: observed kids making speech gestures @ around 4-6 months (w/o any connection to society culture!)

Channeled: how genes channel environmental effects.

àkid won’t walk sooner if you try to teach him! (except in extreme cases)

-Other things are less channeled –i.e. social relationships

-genes give general behavioral trends. Environments just actualizes some and not others

àthe longer the gene has been switched on, the harder it is to revert it.

-Channeling is first dominant and then lessens w/ time

-i.e. in first 2 years, development is identical in all kind/ after 2nd year, split in kids development b/w individuals depending on culture/surrounding

àGenes are not everything!!!!! (context also has its influence!)

-After a while, Environment also affect genes/Development

Example

Genes: control the time of speech development

Practice/exposure (environment): control the development of the region of brain, according to the level/kind of speech

Critical period

A period of time in which the baby needs a certain input in order to achieve optimum conditions

[environmental/gene interaction]

Examples

  1. if baby’s eyes get covered the first while after birth – he b/c blind for the rest of him life
  2. baby who has a lot of skin-contact w/ mom right after birth develops a certain relationship w/ her è which won’t be achieved otherwise (or if started too late)

  1. Mutual relationships: brain/genes give a talent: talents can develop brain in the talents’ specific areas ài.e. playing a musical instrument



Family Microsystems

1) Transaction model

2) Bi-directional model

Transactional

Snowball effect. Kid reacts a certain way to his environment, which prompts a certain response from parent/guardian; which prompts kid to act certain way, etc…

Bi-directional

-a dynamic relationship where both factors influence each other


-i.e. if kid has temperament, parent might give kid less attention

Negative emotionality
Positive emotionality

àboth genetic.

-The more negative the kid is, the more negative society id to him àthough they need more attention in order to get hooked into society



Factors within the family structure

Fathers within family system

Only recently, researchers b/c interested in father’s direct/indirect influence on kid

àuntil now, didn’t take active role:

1) Mom didn’t allow
2) More convenient: rather have a relation w/ kid based on fun stuff as opposed to growing up

Studies: from infancy, kid is close to dad too.

àRelationship strengthens in childhood, especially w/ boys

Experiment

-Took a group of kids from divorced mom

  • Some kids did poorly in school
  • Some kids improved from poor to good
  • Some did well.

Question: How come there is a change (improvement) in one of the groups?

Answer: possibilities:

  • She had more stable relationship during kid’s course of study
  • Could be factors outside of family structure
  • Step-dad had direct influence on kid
  • àMost accepted: Step-dad had indirect influence on kid

Nov 27 class fill-in

Study

100 families Jewish from Israel

65 Arabs ½ from Ramallah, ½ from Israel

Minimum Requirement

  • Married
  • First kid
  • Parents are duel earners
  • Parents: at least a High-school diploma


Interest of study:

  • Mom’s adaptation to work after first
  • Interaction relationship within family

Results:

-Both Man/wife said they contribute equally to upbringing the kid

-Wife said she spent more hours w/ kids, despite saying that the workload was equal

Conclusion:

  • The connection b/w father/kid is depending of # of activities, not hours together.
  • Quality of marriage affects the dad’s relationship w/ kid, though mom’s relation w/ kid is independent of marriage quality
  • Activities w/ kid differ b/w mom/dad

àActivities w/ dad are more energetic

àGames w/ mom more calm/intimate

  • Best interactions: dad-boy/mom-girl


Siblings within a family structure

-Siblings have both a direct/indirect influence on development of kid

Research

-kids w/ older brothers are more competitive

-kids w/ older sisters are more feminine

‘Birth order effects’- is the systematic differences in behavior that stem from the order of birth.

i.e.2nd child less striving for educational success than 1st

àBut is more sociable

-there are many factors for that phenomenon:

i.e. 2nd child gets less attention at childrearing age that 1st child

àbut is forces to socialize w/ older sibling

Please note: influence on siblings are not unison in all families

àEven in families w/ same # of kids; same age/gender

èit also depends on how the older kids were prepared to accept the experience of a new sibling (b/f/ his birth)

èalso the family’s ability to adapt to the new child scenario

Learning from older siblings:

Direct: Older kids teach younger kids how to do things

àusually use negative comments like: ‘you are so stupid…’

-Negative comments helps kid’s development àgets him to push harder

Indirect: Observation

Conclusion:

Family is a series of interrelated relationships of:

  • Parent/parent
  • Parent/child
  • Child/child

    (àSee Minuchin above)

Close relationships outside of the family

-As the kids grows he in encountered w/ relationships outside the family

Q)How does mom working effect kid?

A) researchers could not find difference in development if mom worked less than 35 hours a week outside home within the first year of kid.

Types of out side relationships

1)day care of some sort 2)peer group 3)neighborhood 4)school

Day care program

Formal or informal care of a group of kids by a supervisor

àpsychologists claim that is setting has a beneficial effect on the kid’s development

àbut there is a negative effect w/ the # of kids in day care is higher

àless personal attention

Peer groups

-2nd to family in importance

àimportance grows w/ age

àby adolescence, peer group influences dress/taste/activities

àApproximately @ age 11, ½ time is spent w/ peers

àteenagers: vast majority of the time

-in the peer-groups, teen learn to make symmetric (equal) relationships

-as opposed to the teen-adult relationship which is not equal

àadult can tell kid what to do but not vice-versa

-in symmetric relationships:

àteens learn to work together/control aggression

àvalues/beliefs are reinforced

Neighborhood

-each neighborhood has its own social/physical characteristics

àkid is influenced by garden/space/retail/types of neighbors/their values/socioeconomic level of neighborhood

Studies: show that the socioeconomic level of neighborhood influenced kid more than family income

àHigher school dropout in low-income neighborhoods than in high-income neighborhoods, regardless of family income

Collective socialization: behavior model brought on by adults in neighborhood

Behavioral Contagion: behavioral problems influenced by peers

School

-Kids spend an enormous amount of time there.

-Formal learning takes place when kid is cognitively ready for it, beginning of elementary school,

-Junior high – split b/w teachers of subjects – but one main teacher

àassumption: such relationship w/ adult is important at this age of life

*Kids learn much more than what is in the book: they learn mainstream social norms/ values/cleanliness\discipline\precision\competitiveness\hard work\material success.

Studies shows: that strong directorial managements/follow up on student achievements/ high expectations are main factors in learning experience of kids

Socioeconomic context

Includes:

-Intimate community: Family/day-care/peers/school

-Community: Political organizations/health care/religious institutions

- Broader community: family size expectation/ standard marriage age/crime rate

i.e. if inflation rate/unemployment/crime =high, pressures on low-income parent will be higher, and might affect for the worse the upbringing of kid

Changes in the family b/c socioeconomic factor

-(Examples are of American statistics)

  • only 60% of kids in America live w/ both biological parents
  • 10% of families have step-parents
  • b/w 1947-1993- increase from 29% to 70% of marries moms working
  • B/w 1970-1993 200% increase in single families w/ kids under 18
  • In 1993, 27% of families are single families
  • 50% of kids were at one point or another in a one parent family

Mom’s work and it’s influence:

Factors:

1) kid’s age when mom starts to go to work

2) Quality of the time spent together after the work

3) Day care quality

4) Mom-child relationship

5) Probably most important: how mom sees her role regarding parenthood [regardless of whether she is working or not]

Single parenthood

In the last 25 years, astonishing increase in single moms

-Decrease in teenage moms (though there is an increase b/w 1987-1991

-teenage-moms’ kids often have cognitive/behavioral problems

àit could be that the low income of such families is the cause of these problems

àbut the comparison of poor single families to poor 2 parent families reveals that low income is not the deciding factor

-the teen-mom’s kid’s developmental problems are not inevitable

àin culture where teen-moms have support of extended families, kids’ developmental problems seem to be minimal. àsome finish high-school successfully

Divorced parents

-Huge effect on school-age kids

  • Temporary decline in success in school
  • More demanding/less obedience to guardian parent

Second divorce:

-More Complicated effect on kids:

  • Some bloom
  • Some have delayed development
  • Others show problems only in adolescence

Factors depend on:

  • Age of kid
  • Gender
  • Personality
  • Household lifestyle quality
  • Quality of parenthood
  • Other resources available to both parents/kids

Question: is this decline in kid’s behavior a result of divorce or the fighting b/w the parents

Answer:

  • Divorce that ends a quarrelling relationship is better than continuing that relationship
  • Divorce where the quarrelling continues is worse!

-no difference whether only one parent has guardianship over kid or both (as long as there are no fights b/w parents

-parents continuing fighting/continued fighting has most influence, regardless of the guardianship arrangement. (as long as arrangement doesn’t cause further tension/arguments)

àadolescents deal w/ divorce best (given that there is cooperation and no more quarrelling b/w parents)

ànew stresses might play a factor in the development of a child if his guardian has financial constrains due lower income due to the divorce.

Other, non-conventional families

-Single person who wants to adopt a kid w/o marriage

-Homosexual marriage

-Homosexual marriages seem not to affect kid’s gender role/psychological development

àit seems like in those cases, other factors, such as social factors influence kid more than parents’ sexual orientation

Social class/poorness/stressors and the family

-Social Class –ranking an individual/family by income within a society

Question: what are some basic differences b/w lower class/middle classes in upbringing kids?

Answer:

-lower class focus more on physically disciplining the kid/listening to parent

-middle class focus more on rationalizing w/ kid/encouraging expression

àboth might have negative outcomes:

#1) might lead to abuse

#2) might lead to kid feeling overly guilty

-the best way is:

1)valid/consistent rules

2)allow the kid to input in rules/decision

*negative feedback from mom usually reflective of low income, not of mom working

*1/5 kids in America are poor

* ½ of black/Hispanic kids

*single parent families are more likely to be under poverty line

*single-moms are fastest growing group of homeless

-kids who grow under-poverty-line suffer from more severe diseases

àoften starts b/f birth

Usually, poverty kids face these problems:

-poor nutrition/access to worse health care

-more prone to diseases/injuries (due to their surroundings at home

-lack of iron

-more stress at home àeconomic uncertainty

-more prone to problems like loss of job/crime/evacuation

-Chronic problems: crowded residency/bad neighborhood/poor living conditions)

àall of these have bad influence on kid’s development

àparents w/ hard economic conditions might b/c depressed/easily-angered

àand therefore use more threats/punishments/use more commanding/degrading tone of voice/physical abuse

àsometimes enhanced by social out-casting/loneliness of parents

*Abuse takes place in all social classes àbut more widespread in lower-class

*kid in not only exposed to violence at home, but also in neighborhood/school

*In some cases, poorness is a vicious circleàgenerations of that family will be poor

àBecause of family behavior (due to stressors)

Cultural influences

-all kids have common genes (regardless of culture) àthey all need to be taken care of.

Cultural context

Parents have 2 roles as child-bearers:

1) Give basic needs of child

2) Socialize the kids

-(Socialization: the process of teaching the child cultural values/rules)

-Socialization is a combination of overt/covert actions/messages

Example #1

Story: in a nursery in china, the 3-year-olds are shown a toy, but thei can’t touch it (a 3 year old American (son of a diplomat) grabs it

àdifference of culture:

  • Socialization in Chinese kindergarten: self control/discipline/group activity

àmost of day is spent w/ programs made by kindergarten teacher/little # of toys

  • Socialization in U.S. kindergarten: independence

àMost of day is spent w/ independent playing w/ toys

Example #2

  • In school, Chinese is more encouraged to do better, regardless of mark

    àEncouraged to take after school lessons to beef up knowledge

  • Americans are encouraged to as best as they can, and that is it.

    àin international testing, chemise do better than Americans, but Chinese Americans do just as well as all Americans

    àproof: educational success is through socialization

Example #3

Research in American showed that:

  • White Americans are competitive even when teamwork would be more beneficial
  • Mexican-American villagers avoid competitiveness at all costs, even when competitiveness would be more beneficial for all parties

àdifferences based on socialization

Example #4

  • In industrial countries, childhood is more self-centered
  • In non-industrial countries, childhood is spent helping w/ family chores

Example #5

  • In western cultures, it is looked down upon to sleep in parents’ bed after infancy
  • In less western culture, it is encouraged. (not doing so is looked as cruel)

Cultural change and child development

-In 20’s-30’s, infant seen as young adult – given bare necessities, so not to be spoiled

-not reacted to if crying

Example

-in chine, the culture is changing from family-centered to state-centered

--> ‘One child a family’

-->China spends a lot of resources on making sure that the generation of single kids does not have negative effect on culture

    -->it is an extreme change from a family based socialization to kindergarten-based socialization

Subculture

Subculture: a group that differs in some elements from the values/beliefs of the whole society/culture

Example: in north American culture, there are subcultures of: Hispanic Americans, Euro-Americans; natives/black-Americans, etc.

-Sometimes, the values clash

    -->i.e. in a class, where the emphasis is on personal effort, it might be against cultural values of a kids from a certain subculture

    -->i.e. group work is sometimes cheating, i.e. h/w or tests

-the school-system in America is made for the majority culture – white American

    -->Sometimes it clashed w/ subcultures which emphasize more group work (such as w/I the family)

    -->studies show that when teacher stakes into account subculture differences, the most successful learning takes place

Development as a context

1) Development gives the kid a ‘historical context’

ài.e. Erikson’s stages

2)Development help kids in their future contexts:

àmore cognitive/physical abilities = more expectations from adults

Relationships b/w contexts

Biology/immediate surroundings\socioeconomic level\cultural\developmental contexts are interlinked!

Example

more accepted for moms to work (cultural) /more financial constrains (socioeconomic)

àmore moms w/ small kids start workingàkid spends more time @ day care (immediate surroundings)

-There are direct and indirect influences: i.e.:

    • Kid in only indirectly influenced by parent’s pressure at work
    • Parents choose school and in effect indirectly influence how well/poorly the kid will socialize


Summery of the Chapter

Optimal development depends on good developmental contexts

  1. Genetic contexts:

  • Evolutionary genetic inheritance common to all humans (i.e. inspection/learning skills)
  • Personal genes

    Interaction of genes/environment

  1. Immediate surroundings context

    -Surroundings/people/objects that child comes in contact w/

    àFamily [dominant factor in immediate surrounding context] stimulates kid’s cognitive development

    àrole-models/give early social skills

  1. Close Surroundings

    -includes:

  • day care
  • peer group
  • school

    àin all of these, the kid is taught social skills i.e. fairness/cooperation/values

  1. Socioeconomic context

    -i.e. more trendy now to have single-parent families/mom works.

    àHas biggest influence on poor families:

    -Poorer nutrition/medical treatment àleads to birth problems

    -More stress/instability in these families (b/c economic level)

  1. Cultural context

    -based on beliefs/values of the society

    àresearchers are interested in how they influence child’s development

    àalso interested to find out how Subculture affect kid’s development

  1. Development as a context
  • Development helps kid deal w/ new scenarios (based on past development/experiences)
  • Cognitive/Physiological developments enable surrounding to increase their expectations/demands of the kid, therefore also increasing his ability.

àall factors/contexts have an interactive effect on kid’s development –no context is independent of the others! àeach context influences the others!


Video, Dec 4, 2000

Piaget noted 4 cognitive development stages

  • Sensory mode – infant learns through senses
  • Pre-operational – kid leans through symbols
  • Concrete – logic àno abstract concepts yet
  • Formal operational – use on logic/abstract thought
  • ‘besheila’=? (Pp. 100, 2ns paragraph 2nd line)

    Chapter 4 notes:

    Children are born w/

  • Reflexes i.e. sucking something put into their mouth
  • Astonishing learning capacity
  • Characteristics of child’s earliest abilities

  • some of his abilities are inborn; although sometimes the inborn ability needs maturation or experience b/f it is useful.
  • Some abilities are in reality survival reflexes:
  • Organizing sequences of acts for a certain purpose
  • à

    later in life, those reflexes become more complex

  • Selective reaction: babies tend to focus on areas of color contrast: i.e. hairlines/eyes
  • Those early ability allows kids to learn the connection /w an event and the results of that event
  • One way to research babies' development id to study the cerebral cortex

    Cerebral cortex -the outer layer of the cerebrum

    -->where most intellectual processes take place

    Neurons: basic building blocks of the nervous system

    After birth - first 15 months

    -slight increase in # of neurons-sharp increase in size of neurons

    -Sharp increase in # of connections

    Myelin -Fatty substance that helps transmit the electric messages within the brain

    --

    Baby conditions

    -Babies has many daily conditions

    Classification

    Sleep: Active/inactive

    Awakeness active/quiet

    Distress fussying/crying

    sleep

    -infants spend over 16 hours a day sleeping

    -->sleep amount decreases w/ growth

    -sleep is not organized into a day/night scheme

    -within North American society, day/night scheme is shown in babies 8 weeks old

    -->probably b/c North American parents try to keep baby awake more during day/sleep more @ night

    Inactive sleep

    -Baby sleeps quietly -w/o movements

    -slow breath

    Active sleep

    -REM-like eye movements

    -movements of limbs

    -faster breathing

    -Infants don't have the organized brain wave pattern that adults have

    -->only starts to show @ 3 months

    Distress situation

    Types of cries

    Angry: sudden/loud cry

    Hunger: starts softly/gets louder

    Pain: starts w/ shriek/ continues loudly

    -w/ experience, we can learn to differentiate b/w them

    Calming effect

    -pacifier

    -vocal stimulation

    -changing diaper

    -movements

    -hugging

    -->each baby is calmed differently

    -some babies calm easier/harder

    Changes in baby conditions: with time, baby's conditions (the ones mentioned above) b/c more predictable

    Reflexes

    reflex: automatic/inborn response to a particular stimulus

    -some of the reflexes are on a survival basis, i.e. blinking/sneezing


    -Developmental psychologists are more interested in reflexes which disappear w/ acquirement of more advances skills, than w/ those who are lifelong.

    1)Rooting reflex -baby reflexes to move sideways when cheek stroked -->to find breast to feed on

    2)sucking reflex - when something gets entered in baby’s mouth, it starts sucking

    -both reflexes help baby feed until it knows how to find the nipple itself

    à

    2-4 months - these reflexes disappear -->gives way to voluntary sucking

    Other reflexes

    -Some reflexes are from our evolutionary past.

    Examples

    Moro Reflex

    -arms/hands clamp if baby falls backwards

    -->probably ape's way to grab tree/mom in case it falls

    Grasping reflex

    -when baby's hand stroked, it grasps -->strong enough to hold baby's weight

    -->by 3rd month, baby can grasp voluntary.

    --

    Stepping reflex

    If baby is held upright and feet touch the floor, his legs move reflexively as if he is walking

    -disappears at 3 months but reappear several months later, when the baby is ready to walk

  • reflexes are incorporated into more complex voluntary actions

  • -in early infancy, reflexes (such as grasping/stepping) is controlled by lower command centers

    -->w/ development, higher brain control takes over and inhibits those reflexes

    -->suddenly, babies can voluntarily do things which were reflexes until now

    -->maturation of brain is related to the myelination as well as the proliferation of connections among neurons in the cerebral cortex

  • Experience + Maturation are the 2 key factors
  • --

    Infant learning

    Habituation vs. Dishabituation

    Habituation: decrease in attention when a stimuli is repeated

    Ways to measure habituation:

    1) looking time 2) visual recognition memory (H. fast kids recognize new things)

    Orienting Response

    The psychological/behavioral changes which takes place when a stimuli is first presented

    -->i.e. heartbeat change/slight dilation of the eye pupils

    à

    increased awareness/attention

    Dishabituation

    After a while of dis-learning/disinterest of the habituation to a particular stimulus, renewed, increased attention

    For habituation to take place:

    1)child needs to realize that the stimulus is same as the previous time it has experianced it

    2)Compare 1st and 2nd stimulus to recognize the 2nd as new

    Associative learning

    Associative learning - how infants learn that several events are associated w/ each other

    à

    certain stimuli goes w/ certain scenario

    * 2 kinds of associative learning: Classical conditioning/Instrumental conditioning

    Classical conditioning

    -to associate a new stimulus w/ an old stimulus and its established reflex response

    Example:

    -Ivan Pavlov (psychologist) - caused dogs to salivate by ringing a bell when they eat. eventually they salivated to the sound of the bell w/o having food in from of them

    Instrumental Conditioning

    -also called Operant conditioning

    -learning behaviors through the influence of their consequences

    Positive reinforcements: the presentation of a pleasant stimulus following a behavior, to increase likelihood it will be repeated

    -->example: baby gets bread every time he says 'beh'

    Negative reinforcements: the removal of unpleasant stimulus to increase likelihood of that behavior

    -->example: baby's diaper changed every time he cries

    Punishment: the presentation of a unpleasant stimulus to discourage behavior from repeating

    -->Example: kid slapped every time he does something wrong

    -Reinforcement: any event that follows a behavior that increases the likelihood that the behavior will be repeated

    -->the dogs associated the bell sound w/ the food

    Shaping: reinforcing which gradually gets closer to the target behavior

    -->example: if baby said 'beh' every time he wants bread, the dad might repeat the word 'bread, and eventually only give kid when his mumbling becomes closer and closer to the word 'bread'

    Imitative learning:

    -behaviors learnt by imitation of others.

    -->faster way of learning than shaping

    -->child must be able to reproduce and remember the behavior for future use.

    Imitation development

    Before 6 months

    Baby can match behaviors if perceptual consequences, such as sound. i.e. if baby makes a certain sound, and the adult repeats it, the bay will often repeat it

    Beginning at 6 months

    -babies will try to imitate sounds/behaviors that they have seen but never done before.

  • beginning of characteristics of linguistics -->speech-like babbling
  • At 12 months

    -Babies b/c much better at imitating unfamiliar behaviors

  • some intelligible words
  • imitation of behavior is more common
  • frequent checking for reassurances
  • At 18 months

    -imitation is very accurate

  • no need for frequent reassurances
  • even imitate behaviors that they can’t monitor their success, i.e. imitating the facial expressions of others
  • The concept of Preparedness

    -genetic disposition to learn certain behaviors

    Examples

  • some early responses are initially preparedness, i.e. smiling. (smiling is inborn to kids)
  • In 2nd 6 months of life, baby starts babbling (genetically) àin order to develop speech
  • Walking àthe stepping reflex
  • Infant motor skills

    0-2 months –chin up

    2-4 months –chest up

    2-5 months –rolls over

    5-8 months –sits w/o support

    5-10 months –stands, holding on something

    6-10 months –pulls self to stand

    7-13 months –walks w/ support

    10-14 months –stands alone

    11-14 months –walks well

    14-22 months walks up stairs

    Motor kills and physical growths

    -infant motor skills develop within a context of drastic growth

    -average growth within the first year:

  • weight triples
  • addition of 10 inches
  • proportion change: a) at birth trunk/larger than limbs; head is inproportionally large
  • à

    kid must learn to deal w/ limbs that are growing/change proportions

    Some Principles of motor Development

  • Differentiation
  • Cephalocaudal development
  • Proximodistal development
  • The joint role of maturation and experience
  • Differentiation

    -everything we learn, motorically, starts simple and becomes more advanced:

    Example:

    *An adult covers a baby’s face

    -a newborn will wildly wiggle clumsily his whole body until adult’s hand is off

    -several weeks later, more usage of arm (specialized function!) but the arm movement will be focused closer to center of body

    -at 6 months, the baby can move adult’s hand is one swipe

    -a month or 2 later, baby will cover face in anticipation/protection

    Cephalocaudal Development

    -Development starts closer to the brain continues downwards

    à

    eye movement/refined sucking will come b/f walking

    Proximodistal development

    -development starts @ center of body and extends outwards

    à

    i.e. –arms develop motorically b/f hands which develop motorically b/f fingers

    The joint role of maturation and experience

    -Maturation gives the general outline for the ability.

    -the experience gives the practical ability/refinedness

    The development of specific motor skills

    Focus of the book is on several motoric skills:

  • Controlled eye movements
  • Reaching and grasping
  • Walking
  • Controlled eye movements

    -eye movements are quite automatic

    -->one of the earliest to develop.

    -->helps young infant study what is around him to discover his environment

    -learning would be severely limited w/o eye movement

    -when they are bored, their eyes move more -->to find something to look at.

    -in the beginning, eyes can almost only focus on bright/dark contrasts

    Pursuit eye movements

    -The smooth, continuous movements of the eye to follow moving objects

    * In younger age, baby can only follow slow moving objects w/ pursuit eye movements

    Saccadic eye movements

    -the rapid, jerky eye-movements that occur when person looks at new object

    -->adult can do it in 1 movement

    -->infants seed several movements to move eyes to new objects

    Reaching and grasping

    -both reaching/grasping are behaviors that are inborn; then they decline/disappear, and then reappear much more advanced

    prereaching

    -a reflex of an infant to spontaneously try to reach for objectw/i it's gaze, even though he can't reach it

    -b/w 1-4 months, there is a decline in prereaching

    -by 4 months, there is voluntary reaching

    -by 15 months, there is smooth/accurate reaching ability

    -->the reflex is a learning aid to help the baby coordinate what he sees and his arm

    -->also to coordinate the (his) hand he sees w/ the object he wants

    -->this process does not lead to the ability to reach w/o seeing arm!!!

    -->successful reach w/o visual audio info

    Study:

    -Brain Maturation allows for reaching skill to develop

    -Environmental situation (experience) develops this potential within the kid

    -Babies tend to reach only for things within their reach (through extending arm as well as other parts of body)

    i.e.:

    -baby who is 5 months old has undergone enough maturation to lean forward to reach.

    -a younger baby won't even try to reach for the object

    -by 8-10 months, the baby leans to lean and reach simultaneously

    Grasping

    -by 3-4 months, baby can voluntarily grasp

    -by 6 months, he can let go

    -by 8 months, he can use thumb against rest of fingers

    -by 1 year, he can oppose the thumb/forefinger (and pick up small things)

    Walking

    -by 7 months, baby can crawl in some fashion or other -->mobility

    -b/f 1 year -can walk w/ support of objects

    -around 1st year, take solo step

    -variances in age where walking starts should not be seen as a problem, unless the delay is extreme

    Stepping reflex

    -stepping reflex-declines around 2 months

    Researchers' positions on why it declines:

    1) Brain is developing -->ability to inhibit reflexes allows for organization of development.

    à

    w/o organization of development, the brain might go on overload

    2) Body mass b/c too big to reflex

    Study

    -Esther Thalans

    -Stepping reflex can be evokes in babies up to 7 months, who are put over a treadmill

    -the walking depends on the integration of many systems, i.e. balance

    -jerky movements (such as the reflexes/stereotypic movements associated w/ moving the legs) leads to smoother movements which enable kid to develop advances skills, such as walking

    Stereotypic movement - the movements of a limb that is nor voluntary, nor reflexes -->it is a series of movements caused by a wide variety of stimuli

    -->usually evoked by excitement

    -->steppingstone in development b/w reflexes and voluntary motoric acts

    -->onset of walking depends on both maturation of nerve system/musscles and practice

    Study (done in 1940)

    Example #1

    -Hopi Indians restrain their infants in very physically constraining boxes

    -the babies were given freedom from this constraint at about a year (which is where non-constraint kids start to walk)

    -->they also started to walk

    Conclusion -shows that maturation is a bigger factor in learning to walk than practice

    Example #2

    -Ache people (of S. America) constrain kids for several years

    -->kids start walking way past 2nd year

    Conclusion: prolonged restraint delays the development of walking

    Examples

    -Kipsigis tribe of Kenya teaches their babies to walk as early as 3rd month

    -->the average for starting to walk is 3 weeks b/f N/A babies

    Conclusion: practice has some influence

    -nevertheless, studies show that the effect of practice (of the reflexes) as opposed to mere maturation exists, but is minimal

    à

    not worth practicing something which is anyways canalized

    Sensory Systems in the newborn

    Vision

    Visual acuity - the degree to which one can see fineness of details

    -->even adults w/ perfect eyesight has somewhat limited acuity

    -->adult has to look closely/under magnifying glass to realize that a picture in the textbook is really made from many small dots

    -babies meet the criterion for being legally blind (their visual acuity is so poor)

    Determining how clearly babies see

    Preferential looking

    -based on babies tendency to look at things of higher contrast

    Experiment

    -babies was shown gray card vs. stripped black and white cards. Then showed increasingly narrow stripes on the stripped cards.

    à

    eventually, the babies did not show preference for the stripped cards

    -At 2 weeks, baby’s sight is 20/300 (baby sees at 20 memters what an adult can see at 300

    -at 5 months, 20/100

    Visual evoked potentials

    -measures brain activity to see if baby can tell the difference b/w objects

    Problem: it gives a higher estimate than reality

  • Optical system of baby is good
  • à

    but brain visual system/Rerina is yet immature

    Studies

    -visual experience w/ pattern needed for development of sight. W/o sight during development = insufficient sight

    Can Babies see color?

  • 7-8 weeks old – discriminate b/w colors
  • 3-4 months – see all colors that adult can
  • Hearing

    Studies show that a fetus can hear by 26-28 months after conception

  • Ways to find out babies hearing capabilities incl. Brainwaves/heart-beat/eye-blinking.
  • -ability to detect direction of sound

    à

    very early skill

    à

    by 18 months, it is at adult levels

    -at first, baby’s hearing capabilities are weak. Has to be 10-20 decibels louder

    à

    by 12/13

    à

    same as adults

    Question

    How well can babies discriminate b/w sounds?

    Answer

    Tool to find out: habituation studies:

    Example

    -Present baby a certain sound until he gets habituated (disinterested in it)

    The present a different sound, and measure the reaction. If there is renewed reaction, then the baby has detected the difference in sound.

  • 6 months - can distinguish sound loudness w/ differences of 10 decibels
  • 5-8 months - can distinguish small changes in pitch
  • -->babies are better w/ higher than lower pitches

    Studies show:

    -babies can distinguish better b/w speach sounds than w/ pitches

    -->i.e. by 1 month, baby can distinguish b/w 'bah' and 'pah' as well as adults

    categorical perception

    -putting a series of perceptions into categories

    -humans, as young as babies use categorical perception

    Smell and taste

    Smell

    -babies respond to odors similar to adults

    -->facial expressions/body movements similar to adults

    * Habituation studies show that babies can make refined odor distinctions:

    -->i.e. mom's perfume vs. other perfume

    -mom's nursing pad vs. other nursing pad

    Taste

    -babies can discriminate b/w/ sweet/bitter/salty

    -->babies can discriminate b/w/ plain water and weak sugar solution

    -at birth, taste-buds are present and localized in the main aread of the tongue, but the taste nervous system is not fully developed yet.

    Organization of Infant sensory Behavior

    -during waking hours, babies spend a lot of effort learning about their environment.

    -->They scan for contrast areas. after they find it, they scan it for a while, then move on

    -as babies grow older, they scan more for internal features of the object

    Development of Perceptual Abilities

    Perception: the process which the brain interprets info from the sendes, giving it order and meaning

    Depth and Distance perception:

    Experiment:

    Babies in a crib:

    1)one side of it had a pattern

    2)Other side =see-through to below - had a pattern below

    -by 7-8 months, as babies started to crawl, they showed preference for side which is not see-through

    -->as they got older, this preference increased.

    -->start of fear of heights in adulthood

    -some studies show that babies can already perceive height at 2 months old

    -The info comes to the Retina in 2D. the brain uses 2 techniques to decipher it into a #D image

    -Kinetic depth cues

    -Binocular depth cues

    Kinetic depth cues:

    -information about depth and distance assumed through its motion

    -->i.e. expansion of size of object

    -'monocular' - only 1 eye is needed in order to make this assumption

    Study: babies blink more often to a computer screen where objects b/c bigger. They also blinked more often to objects on the screen that appear to get then rather than those that appeared to miss them

    -'Accretion-deletion' -when a background disappear and then reappears, you assume that the object that moved is in front of the background

    -->Accretion = reappearance

    Binocular depth cues

    -visual cues for depth/distance assumed by the fact that info reaches both eyes

    Convergence

    -brain measures the angle (convergence) of the eyes. the more they look inwards, the closer the brain assumes that the object is

    *Studies show that by 1 months babies use convergence. by 5 months, they do it accurately.

    Retinal disparity

    By combining the info of both the retinas, which happens to be slightly different, the brain assumes that the image is 3D (i.e. perceives the depth)

    -babies start to show sensitivity to retinal disparity @ 3 months.

    -by 5 months, they effectively use this tool

    Strabismus - the condition where the eyes are misaligned (cross-eyed)

    -Strabismus affected people do not get the full experience they need to develop binocular cueing.

    Conclusion

    ->it shows that both maturation of the brain and practical experience is needed.

    ->moreover, maturation equally affects experience. If baby is born w/o brain cells responsible for binocular cues, but normal eye muscles, he will b/c cross-eyes, b/c brain doesn't tell him when his eyes are aligned or not

    -->W/ sight, brain development/visual experience influence each other in a circular way

    Pictorial depth cues

    -cues which can depict depth/distance in 2D images

    -->'static cues' -they do not depend on motion

    linear perception

    -parallel lines that seem to converge as they extend away from viewer

    Looking at a trapezoid:

    * w/ 1 eye -looks like a slanted rectangle

    * W/ 2 eyes - looks like a trapezoid

    Interposition:

    -when objects appear to overlap, the one perceived to be in the forground is assumed to be in front of the other

    Shading

    -shading by protrusions/depressions in a surface is detected by its shades

    -babies b/c sensitive to those depth cues around the same time they are sensitive to linear cues (around age 5-7 months)

    Size/Shape constancy

    Size constancy:

    the ability to perceive an object from different distances as the same size, despite that it appears bigger/smaller in the Retina

    Shape consistency

    -the ability to perceive an object being the same shape despite seeing from different angles

    Studies show:

  • Babies habituated faster to objects of same size but of different distances than to objects of different sizes
  • Babies seem to have size/shape constancy inborn. -->b/c efficient in 3-5 months old
  • Perception of Faces

    -complex procedure of learning that requires several steps.

    -newborns -can recognize mom's face

    -3 months -can recognize her on a picture

    -5 months -can remember strangers' faces

    --

    -At first, babies prefer moving face-like image than static/blank face

    Question:

    -if baby prefers moving faces/learns to recognize mom's face fats, why does it take so long for general face perceptions to develop?

    Answer:

    -different neurological/visual info is used at various ages.

    i.e.

    -at first, babies use outline to discriminate b/w objects:

    -->babies can discriminate b/w basic shapes, but can't distinguish b/w/ square w/ circle in it vs. square w/ triangle in it.

    -->only later, can babies start to discriminate b/w internal features of an object [which is a requirement for face-recognition]

  • 1 month-old baby - focuses on outer edges of face
  • -->follows general outline of face -->the cerebral cortex is not used

  • 2-months-old baby -focuses more on internal features
  • ->development of areas in the cerebrum cortex allows for use of it

    First Adaptations in context

    -biology inbuilt reflexes in the kids to babies to respond to their environment

    -some pre-adapted preferences, i.e. attraction to light/dark contrast/ attraction to human voice

    -environment gives baby experiences needed to develop brain/motoric skills/perceptual abilities/behaviors

    -babies/adults are bias to direct attention t/w each other

    [summery of chapter on page 152-153 of textbook]

    Class, Dec. 18, 2000

    Rule: kids like to interact with familiar things, but they like to look at new things

    --

    Chapter 5 in textbook

  • Cognitive development is orderly
  • infants are active participants in their own development
  • cognitive development us marked by both advances and limitations

  • Advances:

    -basic understanding of the physical world, including property of objects and relationships b/w objects

    -use of basic cognitive tools: categorization/to number/to understand the world

    -combine actions into sequences to get desirable ends

    -increasingly powerful/flexible abilities

    Limitations

    -emphasis on perceptual info/action as sourses of knowledge of the world

    -absance of symbol/language ability

    -limited flexability in many emerging cognitive abilities

    -limited memory capacity

    Piaget's theory of infant cognitive development

    Assumptions about the nature of infants

    Sensorimotor period - the first 2 years of the infants life, where awareness of environment is limited to what baby can know through senses/motoric acts

    -->Piaget thought that motor activity is essential to development

    -kids at first discover things by accident by moving their limbs/manipulate parts of their bodies

    -->later, discoveries are more intentional -->kids deliberately try out actions and investigate their consequences

    Processes of Developmental change

    2 aspects of Piaget's theory of cognitive development:

    Adaptation/equilibrium

    Adaptation

    How children change to b/c more efficient in their surroundings

    -->i.e. how a kid learns how to drink from a cup instead of a bottle.

    Adaptation has 2 elements: assimilation and accommodations

    -Assimilation: applying old techniques to new scenarios

    -Accommodation: modifying an old technique to adapt to a new skill

    -->b/c increasingly abstract w/ development

    Equilibration

    Regulating one's skills to match the demands of the environment.

    -->i.e. if the environment requires me to drink out of a cup, instead of a bottle, I will change my behavior so that my skills will develop in a way that allows me to be efficient in the new environment

    -->disequilibrium - when my skills are lacking to the demands of environment. Piaget argued that there is a natural response to correct disequilibrium into equilibrium

    -->called 'Equilibration'

    Sensorimotor Stages

    Piaget divided development into 6 sensorimotoric stages

    -->each = increasingly complex

    -->w/ more advanced interactions w/ environment, baby's schemes adapt to more scenarios

    Note:

    1) In each stage, Piaget in merely describing the most advanced level for that stage (at beginning of stage, baby will only start to acquire those skills)

    2) The ages are approximate. The important element is the sequence; not their precise timing.

    3) Piaget is only one way to describe/explain development

    Stage 1 –Reflexes –Birth

    à

    1 month

    -actions are limited to genetically programmed ‘reflexes’*

    à

    limited range of behaviors

    à

    no new behaviors developing at this stage

    *Note: piaget’s definition of the word reflex: any act which is naturally inborn in the child. i.e. active looking

    -at this stage, some of the standard reflexes (i.e. grasping/sucking) are refined

    Stage 2 –primary circular reaction -1-4 months old

    Circular reaction: a behavior which produces an interesting event, initially by accident

    -->then the act is repeated in order to achieve the same event.

    Stage 2: primary circular reactions (1-4 months)

    -the baby learns how to use own body by circular evens: his action leads to a certain reaction.

    Example

    -The baby randomly moves arms, until he hits mouth, which starts sucking.

    Stage 3: secondary circular reaction (4-8 months)

    -the baby learns circular reactions of external objects

    Example:

    -a baby knocks a spoon off the table by accident. He finds the reaction of the spoon falling to the ground interesting. then he repeats it.

    Stage 4: coordination of schemes (8-12 Months)

    Coordination of schemes: a goal-oriented chain of behaviors

    -->baby goes things instrumentally. (for other purposes)

    Example:

    -baby knows that there is an object of interest behind an object

    -->baby will knock front object out of the way. (or go around the object to get to the requested object.

    Stage 5: tertiary circular reactions (12-18 months)

    -a circular reaction involving trial-and-error

    Example:

    -baby throws an object is a various ways to establish the-cause and-effect

    Stage 6: beginning of representational thought (18-24 months)

    Deferred imitation: imitation of observed behavior after a while.

    Symbolic/representational thought

    -the ability to make something stand for another thing.

    -->in infancy, it is still primitive

    -->babies now don't have to go through physical actions to solve problems

    Order of development

    -Reflexes-->lead to sensorimotoric actions

    -Sensorimotoric actions-->lead to representational thought

    Challenges to Piaget's theory

    -his observations are accepted, but his conclusions are challenged

    Major areas of disagreement:

    * Timetables for emergence of distinct developmental stages

    * The existence of qualitatively distinct developmental stages

    * The range of innate abilities

    * Source of infants' cognitive limitations

    Reassessing the timetables for infant Development

    -Researchers suggest that Piaget underestimated baby’s skills at various stages.

  • Sometimes, skills were shown to be acquired earlier
  • Piaget sometimes accredited skill only after it was well developed and could be used in various scenarios
  • There was inconsistence: a kid could be at one stage for one skill and at another stage for another skill.
  • Reassessing infant’s inborn abilities

    -Piaget assumed that baby is born w/ reflexes that spark learning

    à

    some neo-nativists assume that baby has some inborn knowledge/abilities

    Neo-nativism = a contemporary development theory that assumed baby is born w/ inborn knowledge/skills

    Reassessing Infants’ cognitive constraints

    -some researchers think that the development is constrained by limits of information-processing capabilities (working memory)

    à

    Working memory: the information-processing capacity at any given time

    à

    not, as Piaget suggested, a lack of mental representation

    Example

    If baby has to find hidden toy/imitate person

    à

    needs to memorize an order of events

    à

    if his working memory gets filled, there is a kind of information overload

    à

    kid can’t progress w/ action

    -with brain developments and some actions b/c more automatic

    à

    cognitive development in the working-memory allows for more abstract actions

    Infants understanding of the Physical world

    Object Permanence: the understanding that objects continue to exist even when they are out of sight.

    Piaget thought that object permanence is developed over 6 stages

    Sensorimotoric stage 1/2

    Birth-4 months

    -babies have no concept of object permanence

    * during this stage, babies will start to follow objects and reach them (once they have acquired voluntary reaching

    --> but if the object is blocked from view, the baby will lose interest.

    -->even if object is only partially covered (i.e. nipple of bottle covered -->baby won't perceive it as a bottle -->loose interest in it)

    Sensorimotor stage 3

    4-8 months

    -will recognize objects if they are partially covered

    -->will need a partial cue to be reminded of the object (i.e. seeing some if it.)

    Sensorimotor stage 4

    8-12 months

    -baby will move things to find something that is hidden

    But:

    -it is still a limited object permanence.

    -->i.e. if you continually hide a toy in a specific place, the baby will find it. After a while, if you hide it somewhere else, the baby will look in the place you used to hide it. then he will look randomly for it (even though you saw him hide it in the new place)

    -this is called A not-B error

    Sensorimotoric stage #5

    -12-18 months

    -baby no longer makes A not-B Error. they will rather look at the last place that the object was seen.

    -->i.e. if they saw a ball in someone's hand. this person closes hand (hides ball) and then puts it under a cloth -->the baby will look in the hand and not under cloth. after they are disappointed at not finding ball under cloth, they look randomly

    Sensimotoric stage #6

    -18-24 months

    baby will now have a mature understanding of object permanence

    -->they can imagine the objects that they do not necessarily see

    à

    various theories to show that piaget’s age classification might be are inaccurate

    ß

    -Some researchers claim earlier ages for those developmental stages

    -->i.e. if a substantial minority of infants learnt this task, they considered it a learned task for that age-group

    Perception of partially hidden objects

    Study (kellman/spelke)

    -this study thought that babies recognize partial hidden objects sooner than piaget suggested.

    -->i.e. a box moved back and forth blocking the middle section of a rod

    -->babies looked longer at a rod that is split in the middle that 1 long rod (see page 170)

    Evidence of object permanence in stage 3 babies

    -some studies show that 4-8 months olds have some understanding of object permanence

    à

    i.e. babies reached for objects in the dark. [they didn’t see it as they reached for it

    Studies

    Study #1

    Habituation case :

  • Screen moved backward and forwards
  • Test cases:


    Follow-up

    * 4½ month old –had no accurate idea as to where the screen would stop

    * 6 months old – had accurate idea as to where the screen should stop

    Study #2

    Habituation case

  • Toy train rolls behind a screen. Screen is raised b/w each car to show baby what is behind the screen (the track of the train).
  • Test Cases

    [see page 171 for drawings of studies]

    Explaining the infant’s search behavior

    Question

    Why, then, according to those who place the object permanence b/f Piaget does, is there a disparity b/w the development of object permanence and searching for hidden objects?

    Answer

    Baillargeon

    Bbabies start to search, but they do not have the skill of goal-oriented chain of behavior until stage 4 (8 months).

    à

    has to do w/ cerebral cortex’s maturation

    Question

    Conclusion

  • Piaget was fairly accurate about the sequence of the object concept.
  • Piaget underestimates rate of learning it
  • Causality and other relations b/w objects

    -Babies need to understand relationship b/w objects to make sense of perceptional info

    Piaget - this ability comes gradually as a result of sensorimotoric exploration

    Modern researchers: -comes earlier than Piaget thought

    -perhaps inborn

    Studies show:

    Study #1

    7 months babies shown:

    Case #1

    'Causal event': Brick hits another one which gets launched

    -->after habituation, prceeded to case #2

    Case #2

    'Non-Causal event' brick hits another brick

    -->delayed launching of 2nd brick

    -->bricks don't get touch, but the 2nd one gets launched anyways

  • Babies showed dis-habituation to Case #2 events
  • Conclusion:

    7 months old babies can tell cause of some events

    Study #2

    Case of objects being launched b/c they are hit by an object

    6 Months old

    -can tell cause using balls

    10 months old

    Can tell cause w/ all toys

    Study #3

    4 1/2 months old babies look longer at objects suspended in the air.

    -->shows their understanding that something is illogical

    Study #4

    Box moved across a platform

    Possible event Box stopped @ end of platform

    Impossible event: only edge of the box is still on platform, yet it doesn't fall.

    -not all 5-6½ months old could understand that case #2 is an impossible event

    à

    even some 9 ½ couldn’t

    [see page 174 for a drawing of this experiment]

    Conclusion of the studies

    -babies get rudimentary grasp of relations b/w objects @ 4-8 months

    (Piaget’s stage 3)

    à

    but still only in basic scenatios

    -by 8-12 months (Piaget’s Sensorimotoric stage #4), it gets more complicated

    Number

    Piaget: concept of numbers is beyond sensorimotoric period

    Other studies: 4-7 months old have some concept of #’s

    Study:

    4 groups of babies


    -babies habituated to 2 –showed interest in 3

    -babies habituated to 3 -showed interest in 2

    à

    not those w/ 4/6 dots

    Question

  • Do babies see #’s as a picture in their head or as an abstract quantitative thing?
  • Answer

    Study #1

    -8 months babies has 2 boxes of 2/3 toys

  • They looked more often at the 3 toys when hearing 3 drumbeats
  • They looked more often at the 2 toys when hearing 2 drumbeats
  • Study #2

    -babies shown a doll than screen hid the doll

    -hand comes out of screen w/ another doll then goes back behind screen.

    -hand comes out of screen again w/ no doll

    à

    when screen comes up, babies shown 0,1,2 dolls

    à

    show more interest in 1 doll

    Conclusion: they probably expected to see 2!

    Study #3

    -2-3 months old shown pattern: 2 pictures on right, 1 picture on left

    à

    learned to tell this numerical pattern

    --

    Conclusion

    -Babies seem to have numerical skills, yet it is limited to 3 or under.

    Categorization

    Categorization- the ability to put into a general scheme from past experience/knowledge

    Example

    -at 3 months, baby can distinguish b/w animals

    à

    even though baby has not concept of ‘animal’

    Study

    7-11 months given toys of same category

  • Various cars
  • Various animals
  • à

    showed decreased interest in each category of toys after time

  • didn’t differentiate b/w animals
  • Generalization: babies (14 months) generalized about animals broadly (i.e. to drink from cup/sleep in bathtub

    à

    not done those generalizations w/ vehicles!

    As seen, sometimes, generalization is too broad

    -i.e. doll put to bed in bathtub

    à

    by 18 months, generalization is more specific

    Conclusion

    3 months =perceptual categorization

    7 months =conceptual categorization

    11 months =application of categorization in behavior

    18 months = more specific categorization

    Memory development in infancy

    Recognition memory

    Recognition memory- a type of memory to which a certain stimulus is perceived to be familiar

    Recall

    Recall –active retrieval of info from memory

    à

    requires repression of memory

    -At first, babies could only have recognition memory

    à

    later in infancy, memory developes

    Newborn – has some memory skills, i.e. mom’s smell/voice/face

    à

    until 3 months, babies have problems w/ remembering visual info, such as angles. They can’t recognize angles as being the same, when the angle was changed orientation (see top of page 178)

    -humans perceive things comparing them to other things already in memory

    à

    but at first, babies remember things independently of other things they know

    à

    that is why they can’t at first recognize things like faces at first

    -babies, at first, only remember things for hours/days

    à

    within month or 2, memory ability increases to weeks

    à

    once memory is gone, in could be reactivated

  • babies form long-term memories
  • Cued Recall- type of memory that a familiar stimulus triggers recall of stored info

    -up to 6 months – recall is context-bound

    à

    change of room/color of object might disrupt the recall

    Development of memory at first 6 months

  • Progress from limited to simple recognition to cued recall
  • Lengths of time a memory is retained increases
  • Relationship b/w visual stimuli increases
  • But, $ 6 months, memory is still limited to context
  • Memory in later infancy

    -emotional development is dependant on development in 2nd 6 months of life (6-12 months old)

    -helps in development of object permanence

    à

    based on development of working memory skill

    Example

    -at 8 months, babies can find hidden object after a 2 second delay

    -12-15 months –babies can find hidden object after 10 second delay

    à

    increase in working memory

    By 11 months= baby able to reproduce actions such as putting a button into a box and shaking box.

    à

    3 months later, baby is able to recall and reproduce act

    By 16 months-complex sequences:

    -a baby can undress/bathe a dull

    à

    baby is capable of deferred imitation earlier than Piaget thought.

    --

    7 months – able to remember usual locations of objects

    11 months – able to remember unusual location

    Memory improvement b/w 6-18 months

  • emergence of working memory
  • continual increase ib long memories’ retrieval
  • Ability to contain/reproduce increasingly complex action sequences
  • Increased ability to engage in both cued/spontaneous recall
  • -B/w/ 6-18 months, baby is less dependant of perceptual cues

    Analysis of info shows:

    -some w/ high infant test scores, score average/below average IQ

    -some w/ low infant test scores, score average/high IQ

    Brain development and infant memory

    -infant memory is not carried to later in life

    Explicit/declarative memory

    -conscious memory. It involved mental representation of images/ideas

    -->could be explicitly explained/declared

    Implicit/procedural memory

    -unconscious memory, involving procedures or skills

    -->does not lend itself to explicit memory

    Example

    Bicycle

    -memory of learning to ride/receiving first bike

    -->explicit/declarative memory

    -the memory of how to ride = implicit/procedural

    -->well learnt skill

    Chuck Nelson

    -First 6 months, most memory acquired is implicid.

    -->Dependant on hippocampus/cerebrum’s development

    -after 6 months, development of a connection b/w cerebral cortex and hippocampus

    --> Development of the memory skills

    Infantile Amnesia- the phenomenon of adults not remembering infancy [see page 182, as well as what was just discussed]

    Social context and cognitive development in infancy

    Socio-cultural view –adults structure the environment for the kids.

    -->cognitive development affected by stimulation received at hime

    Middle class

    -focus is more on cognitive/perceptual development (i.e. toys/objects)

    -->more emphasis on academics

    Lower Class

    -Emphasis is less on academics -->less cognitive stimulation

    Cross-cultural research shows:

  • very slight variation on Piaget’s Object Permanence b/w kids in various cultures around the worlds
  • Striking similarities in the Process of sensorimotoric development
  • I.e.

    Babies in France/Africa played same way w/ paper clip, even thought it was culturally meaningless in Africa

    -difference in motor/cognitive development also influenced by floor freedom

    -Americans tend to baby-proof their homes, so babies can explore world safely

    -->not so in tropical areas where more dangers

    -->less time spent exploring

    -->less cognitive/motoric development over time

    Vygotskian perspective

    Vygotsky: babies develop through exploration:

  • kids find out what adults already know
  • kids can sometime learn rapidly and sometime only learn w/ substantial effort and help from adults
  • Things learnt from adults are most likely always highly valued within that adult’s culture/social context
  • -

    Debate:

    Piaget

    Environment provides general context for child to develop

    Information-processing theorists

    Environment gives specific context for kids

    -

    Individual differences in infant cognitive skills

    -there are tests to measure individual differences in development and if they are significant to future development

    Examples:

  • Bayley Scales of Infant Development
  • Gesell development schedule
  • Cattall Intelligence for infants and young children
  • Note: tests for younger kids focus on attention/sensorimotoric coordination

    -->tests for older kids ar emore cognitive in nature

    Study #1

    -longitude test

  • 3 months -->18 years
  • Conclusion

    -test scored do not correlate intelligence until about age 4

    Study #2

    Development tests do not reflect IQ

    Conclusion

  • Development is more unstable during younger age
  • More likely: younger ages’ tests do not reflect the same skills as the IQ tests
  • -Recently, researchers found other cognitive measures of infants that do reflect IQ

    -->[correlation of 0.40]

    Example


    2 important points could be drawn:

  • this info demonstrates that it is good for group predictions but not good for predictions on the individual level
  • Even though there is predictability, the development is not biological
  • Information processing

    -How fast a kid habituates to stimulus/processes perceptual info predicts info predicts IQ as late as 11/12

    Colombo: 2 infancy factors involved in IQ

  • Speed of information processing
  • Capacity of working memory
  • Conclusion:

    Traditional tests don’t predict IQ well.

    Newer tests seem to predict better, i.e. info proceeding skills such as habituation and novelty (new things) preference

    Advances and limitations

    -Brain growth spurts: 3-4 months

  • 3-4 months
  • 7-8 months
  • [summery of chapter 5 on page 187-188]

    Attachment theory

    -Started w/ Bowlby (psychoanalyst)

    à

    Studied, based on the orphans that showed up in England after WWII

    Chapter 6 –emotional development

    Newborn =pre-adopted to social exchanges

    -new babies are born w/ certain predispositions that help them participate in early social exchanges

    à

    provided that they get responsive care-giving

    -those predispositions preadapt the newborn to b/c social

    à

    but will only dev. w/I a certain context

    Examples of preadopted predispositions

  • The ability to signal physiological/psychological needs that adults can interpret
  • The ability to detect contingencies in the environment
  • Attraction to a social stimuli
  • Inclination to fall in step w/ caregiver’s behavior
  • Baby cared 24 hours by either nurse A or B:
  • A – responded less quickly than B to cries of baby

    à

    but less hurried/automatic care that B

    B - somewhat abrupt/fragmented

    Result

    Origin of reciprocity

    Reciprocity: true social interaction involving mutual exchanges b/w partners/

    Sensitive care: a care-giving style where the caregiver attends to the infant's needs and responds to them promptly and effectively.

    Attunement: a kind of 'sensitive care' where the caregiver's adjustment of the stimulation that they provide in response to signs from the infant

    -through countless hours of interaction, parents b/c aware of moods/signals of baby and adjust their behavior accordingly.

    Example of dev. of communication:

    -mom starts speaking/cuddling baby when pause in sucking: eventually develops the turn taking of talking

    -By 3/4 months: control of facial expressions; eye/head movements

    -->baby starts to be selective of stimuli

    -Reciprocity: learnt gradually. each step leads to the next.

    'Becoming an active participant: the example of social smiling.'

    -example of development of reciprocity:

    -->very imp. for development of relationship w/ kid

    -technically, newborns only smile b/c of spontaneous electrical discharges in lower brain region.

    -->at early infancy: only occurs while sleeping

    Newborn Smiling

    -takes place at sleep

    -b/c of fluctuations around a critical threshold (see top of p. 200)

    -facial muscles relax causing a smile

    -if mild stimulus is done (such as a rattle), it might cause a gentle arausal in baby's brainwaves, causing a smile, several seconds later (since the baby's response system is still slow)

    -but if the baby is aroused in a startling way, the arousal level will shoot up and won't come down the critical threshold for the smile, for quite some time (see p. 200)

    -a few weeks later, a baby starts smiling during daytime as well.

    -->adults are also programmed: to misunderstand those smiles as intentional and meaningful. therefore they react to the baby's smiles.

    -->at 5 weeks, kids smile at any gentle stimulation; but parents think that the baby is smiling at mom's voice

  • Soon, parents' voice (especially mom's) will be special to kid
  • -at 8-10 weeks, baby begins to smile at mom's face. (as well as anything else familiar)

    -->b/c of 'recognitory assimilation'

    'recognitory assimilation': smiling at visual stimulus which is familiar and is associated w/ an established scheme.

    -->this time, the smile is also caused by arousal fluctuations.

    -seeing an object causes tension which, when associated w/ a scheme, is relieved w/ a smile.

    -by 3 months: baby can discriminate b/w familiar/unfamiliar faces

    -by 4-5 months: can specifically recognize parents' faces and react aspecially to mom

    -->at this point, baby stops smiling at strangers faces and only at mom's face.

    -->at this point, the smile is a truely social act

    Summery: at first 6 months, an interaction b/w parent/child, partially on basis of baby's responses when they talk/play.

    -->prompts the continuation/elaboration of relationship/development

    Emotional development

    -includes the emergence of various emotions and the development of emotional regulation

    Forerunners of basic emotions

    emotion =state of feeling that arises when a person evaluates an event in a certain way.

    -i.e. when 8-months old baby places on the see-through crib, shows physiological/behavioral signs of fear

    -during 1st year, motions get increasingly differentiated and specified to certain events

    -from the beginning, babies seem to show basic emotions such as cries/sleep smiles.

    -->they are reflexive responses to arousal levels in brain and not emotional signs

    -->by 3 months, beginning of specific emotional signs

    But those responses are not full-blown:

  • Emotional reaction of 3-6 month olds take time to build up.
  • The meaning attached to the events are very general.
  • Emotional responses are somewhat global and hard to differentiate.
  • --

    Beginning of emotional regulationand coping

    -babies gradually getskills to cope w/ emotioannly arrousing situations

    Examples:

    -babies -deep sleep after surgery

    -->global and involuntary

    -4-5 months - turn away from intense stimulus

    -still universal and somewhat involuntary

    -->5 months old will havea tough time turning from stranger staring at him

    -->willlook back atstranger,and eventuallystart cryings

    crying - a way to interrupt interaction w/ environment

    Development in 2nd 6 months (7-12 months)

    -increased organization -->especially revolving around caregiver

    -->the element of purposefulness

    -the changes are so dramatic, that they could be considered qualitative

    Example: babies hospitalized older than 7 months show negativity to hospital staff. then they need readjustment back to the home

    -->not so for babies less than 7 months

    Emotional development

    1)clearly differentiated specific emotions emerge

    2)emotional response b/c increasingly immediate, rather than requiring time to build up

    3) all the classified expressions of emotions begin to appear regularly

    -by the end of 1styear, infant can recall past experiences and anticipate consequences/outcomes

  • 8-10 months could b/c upset when ball goes under couch or anger when he sees person w/ labcoat (association w/ doctor/needles)
  • Emotional reactions to the unfamiliar

    5 months =if stranger looks long enough (about 30 secs) the baby starts crying

    7-10 months =reacts negatively even w/o prolonged inspection of them

    -->called 'stranger distress'

    -Stranger distress lasts 2-3months

    -->sometimes into 2nd year

    -->varies greatly among kids

    -babies are not scared of just any new unfamiliar thing

    Example:

    -if mom puts on a mask -delight

    -if stranger puts on a mask -freight

    -if then mom puts on the same mask - freight

    -->context is relevant

    Context

    -baby might smile @ stranger from faraway, but distressed when stranger comes near and tries to lift him

    -->more rapidly the stranger approaches, the more fear

    -->in home =less fear than in lab -->familiar surroundings

    -->if care giver is close =less fear

    -->if caregiver has a worried look =more fear

    Conclusion

    -by 10 months, infants can make evaluations about the threat of strangers/new situations

    -->those evaluations depend on the environment

    Emotional regulation/coping

    emotional regulation =expands dramatically in 2nd 6 months of life

    -->more subtle/flexible/serviceable

    -coping techniques: as heartbeat increases -looks away to reduce heartbeat and relax. then baby relooks

    -->see top of p.205

    -that kind of baby doesn't cry

    -->the ones who do usually doesn’t go through the relaxing technique

    Emotional Coping technique

    -purposefully signaling to caregiver: calling/gesturing/stress signal/moving to caregiver when threatened

    -->unlike crying, this helps baby stay in contact w/ environment and have organized behavior

    Dyadic regulation = accomplished by both caregiver and infant -(regulation of emotion)

    -->part of attachment

    -at this point [late in first year] -not only more occurrence but also meaning of event

    -->dev. of sophisticated skills to cope w/ emotional arousal

    -->development of pathway b/w limbic and cortex regions of the brain

    Foundations of attachment

    Definition of Bonding: parents' initial emotional tie to newborn; it occurs @ first hours after birth

    Attachment: an enduring emotional tie between infant and caregiver

    -security @ presence of parent

    -distress w/ caregiver's separation

    -joy w/ caregiver's reunion

    Separation distress

    -negative reaction of infants when caregivers temporary leaves

    -->more common/happens faster in cultures where mom is constantly w/ kid

    Greeting reaction

    -positive reactions of infants when the caregiver appears

    Secure-base behavior

    -behavior which baby uses caregiver as a base for exploration

    -->looks back @ caregiver for security

    -->goes back to caregiver if feels threatened

    The base of attachment

    -attachment is diff. from bonding

    Attachment: 2 way relationship/develops over time

    -early contact b/w parents helps but not essential to the relationship

    -attachment doesn't have to be biological parent

    -usually, infant attaches to several people. i.e. both parents/siblings/kindergarten teacher/etc.

    -human infants have hierarchy of attachments

    ->probably for survival

    -->when being attached and parent is not present, baby will go to someone else who is attached

    Views on attachment:

    1) psychoanalysts/learning theory: attachment is related to mom's feeding

    2) Bonding: attachment is built into the human's natural selection

    Harlow experiment

    -2 fake monkeys.

    1) made out of soft cloth. -no bottle

    2) made out of wires -this one had a bottle

    Assumption: infant monkeys are going to b/c attached to wired monkey since it had a bottle (i.e. food)

    Result: baby monkeys attached to soft monkeys

    Conclusion: security interaction =is more important that food for attachment.

    Approaches to explain difficulties in attachment among children

    1)Erikson: Psychosocial theory + Bowlby's attachment theory

    -influenced by the quality of care/variability in the security/infant-caregiver attachment

    2)Ethological: genetic influence

    Attachment framework

    -except in extreme cases, infants b/c attached to a caregiver.

    Generally, infants w/ problems such as retardedness/blind/physically disabled/abused

    -->b/c attached, but slower

    Example: the monkies in Harlow's experiment b/c punitive/rejecting as parents

    -->though their babies stilled cringed to them

    Bowlby's hypothesis

    -attachment is dependant on quality of attachment.

    -->w/ sensitive care, infants assume caregiver will be responsible

    -after repeated times where caregiver relieved baby's stress, baby assumes it can rely on that adult for safety

    -->Erikson called it 'trust'

    -->bowlby called it secure attachment

  • If there is a problem w/ attachment, an insecure/anxious attachment will develop
  • Patterns of attachment

    Sensitive care hypothesis: care in infancy has lasting effects.

    Ainsworth: some attachments are 'secure' others are 'anxious'

    Strange situation: mom enters w/baby to a playroom -->then mom leaves briefly

    -->shows how well baby got attached

    -Anxious attachment is where the infant is not confident of the caregiver's availability and/or responsiveness

    -->can't use caregiver as a secure base for exploration

    Secure attachment

    -associated w/ proper sensitive care

    -60-70% of kids

    -infant is confident in caregiver's responsiveness and availability

    -uses the caregiver as a secure basis for exploration

    -->they might be upset at separation, but they are happy at reunion.

    Anxious-restraint

    -associated w/ exaggerated maternal behavior/ineffective soothing

    -infant is reluctant to separate from mom, but shows ambivalence to caregiver after when mom returns

    Anxious-avoidant attachment:

    -associated w/ unavailable or rejecting mom

    -a type of anxious attachment in which the infant readily separates from caregiver and avoids contact after reunion

    -not scared of strangers

    -doesn't cry when mom leaves

    -when she returns, he tries to avoid her @ all costs

    -->not so w/ strangers

    Disorganized attachment

    -worst kind of attachment

    à

    no mold of attachment/relationships

    à

    often appears in poor neighborhoods w/ much neglect and abuse

    -associated w/ maltreatment/confusing mom behavior

    -shows conflicting emotions

    -showed conflicting events of diff. kinds of attachment.

    --

    C*opy Chart

    --

    secure attachment

    -readily explores toy

    -affectively sharing of toys

    -affiliative to strangers w/ caregiver's presence

    -readily comforted when distressed [promoting a return to play]

    -infant seeks interaction/contact after separation

    -if distressed: seeks contact to relieve distress

    -if not distressed: active greeting behavior: strong initiation of interaction

    Anxious-resistant attachment

    -shows poverty of exploration

    -difficulty separating to explore -may need contact even prior to separation

    -worry of new people/situations

    -may mix contact seeking w/ resistance: hitting/kicking

    -may continue to cry and fuss squirming/reject toy

    -may be show passivity

    Anxious-avoidant attachment

    -independent exploration

    -little affective sharing

    -affiliate to stranger when caregiver is away -->little preference

    -actively avoids mom after reunion

    -->turns away/looks away/moves away/ignores

    -->may mix proximity w/ avoidance

    -->avoidance is more extreme on the 2ns reunion

    -->no avoidance of strangers

    Disorganized/disoriented attachment

    -infant shows inexplicable/conflicting behaviors that don't fit any category

    Sequential contradictory: i.e. contented play interrupted by extreme anger

    -Simultaneous contradictory: fearful smile/approach and avoidance.

    -baby might appear disorganized/disoriented

    -may show slow/incomplete movements/stilling

    -may show all mannerisms (stereotypies)

    -->develops w/ threatening caregiver

    Quality of care and security of attachment

    Approach #1 Look @ parent/infant interaction

    i.e. earlier caregiver's interaction or sensitivity predicts child's attachment and later behavior

    -->child's early behavior does not predict future

    Approach #2 study the effects of quality of care of attachment to assess abusive ot neglecting parent

    -w/i first year, baby will cry less if promptly helped

    -->crying is not reinforced but is rather used as short signals to get prompt help

    Sensitive care =not 'perfect' care but rather 'good enough'

    Context of caregiver

    secure attachment =depends on kind of care that baby receives

    3 big factors:

    1)amount of stress in caregiver's life

    2)social support available to caregiver

    3)caregiver's own developmental history

    Life-stress/social support

    -easier to cope w/ daily problems/hassles w/ others are there to help

    -people w/o help/support of others usually also have $ probs.

    Parent's developmental history

    -studies related to caregiver's perception of their own childhood to quality of infant/caregiver attachment

    Mary Main

    'adult attachment Interview'

    -adults talk about attachment related feelings/inconsistencies

    =you can infer how much responsive care they had/to what degree they have solved any feeling of mistreatment.

    -->but sometimes, it is hard to infer past, since adults might be infl. by current situation: might lead the, to report their history negatively/describe relationship w/ their infant poorly.

    -some adults achieve emotional freedom despite insecure attachments

    Monkey study

    -monkey gives its baby physical contact. the amount it gets =correlated to how much it gives its offspring

    More than:

    1)mom gave all offspring [genetic inclination]

    2)mom gave younger offspring [observation]

    Infant attachment

    internal working model

    -An infant's generalized expectation about the social world incl.:

    1)caregiver responsiveness

    2)the infants ability to obtain care (worthiness)

    3) nature of social relationships

    An infant who receives responsive care:

    1)develops a model of a caregiver as available

    2)self worthiness -worth of care +obtaining it

    2) social relationships as pleasurable and rewarding

    -studies support Bowlby's theory that quality of attachments help shape child's internal working model of a social world

    -->helps predict how well chilf will function later

    -ethusiasm in solving problems/high self esteem/positive relationships w/ teachers -->strongly linked to quality of early attachments

    The temperament framework

    Temperament: general style of behavior across contexts

    Involves various behavioral characteristics:

    -general activity level

    -irritability

    -proneness to distress

    -reactivity

    -inhibition

    -early temperament focus on specific things, like crying

    Alexander Thomas/Stella chess

    3 Kinds of Babies: easy/slow-to-warm-up/difficult

    1)Easy: biological regularity/readily approaches new people/objects/highly adoptive/mostly positive mood

    2)Slow-To-Warm-Up: mildly negative reactions to new experiences/adapt on after repeated exposure

    3)Difficult: biologically irregular/withdrew from new situations/intense negative feelings/poor adaptability

    Temperament: broadened to alse mean:

    1) tendency to express certain emotions i.e.: wariness/proneness of distress

    2)capacity to regulate one own's behavior.

    Stability of temperament

    -early research based on parent’s reports to measure baby’s temperament

    Problems:

  • Newborn traits are not clear àdon’t start at birth
  • Parents are bias
  • --

    -studies prove that babies have personal temperament, which remain stable over time

    Biology of temperament

    -neuriphysiological/horomonal systems are affected by behavior

    à

    changes in those system reflect behavior

    i.e. Way babies: higher/more variant heart-rate/blood pressure

    -more likely to show asymmetrical electric activity in brain’s cerebral cortex

    -higher level of Coristol (stress hormone)

    è

    parents report low adaptability/high emotional negativity.

    Genetics of Temperament

    -studies show: genetic component for temperament

    -i.e. studies of identical twins

    à

    but other studies show identical twins to behave like each others w/ time

    Possibility: has to do w/ upbringing

    à

    but that has been proven to be true for separately brought-up twins as well!!!!

  • Temperament àeven brain physiology àmust be influenced by environment
  • Conclusion

    Not clear how much genes vs. experience shape behavior

    Temperament and attachment

    Attachment: relationship b/w caregiver/baby

    Temperament: behavior across situations

    -reaction in ‘strange situation’ =not purely based on temperament

    à

    some physiological difference!

    à

    diff. in reaction of diff. parent.

    Quality of attachment =organization of behavior w/ caregiver

    Temperament behavior –behavior, regardless of person who is behaved to.

    Securely attached infants

    -can have a very diff. temperament

    -some cuddy/cry often

    -others cry little/very placid

    Anxious attached

    -could also have diff. temperament

    à

    various ways to express insecurity

    *Temperament may help define what sensitive care is

    Placid kid =frequent stimulation =sensitive care

    Easily over-aroused kid =intense stimulation=insensitive care

    Match/mismatch hypothesis

    Anxious Attachment

    è

    combination of infant’s proneness to distress (temperament) and

    caregiver’s need for sole control

    à

    clashing personalities

    Some studies: temperament infl. Attachment

    à

    more irritability =more anxious/avoidant attachment

    à

    since it affects relationship, mostly in lower class.

    Other cases if temperament infl. On attachment

    -when baby’s characteristics taxes caregiver beyond coping.

    -i.e. primitive baby =increases chance of anxious-avoidant attachment

    *Quality of care/temperament: converge around preschool age.

    à

    uncorrelated quality of care/temperament until then

    *general context is more important than just parental care quality or just ‘temperament’

    Example #1:

    -mom’s ambivalence about parenthood

    -kid’s crankiness

    à

    both intensify eachother

    à

    she might b/c truly hard kid b/c of this vicious cycle

    à

    temporary temperament b/c permanent

    Example #2

    -Kid is slow-to-warm-up

    -mom=patient

    à

    kid develops skills of development into new situations

    Importance of early care

    -Development –total =greater than sum

    Sensitive peiod hypothesis

    -the idea that certain kinds of experience are especially important at a particular point in development

    i.e. quality of attachment in infancy sets the stage for later relationships

    à

    makes a mold which is hard to break out of

    Studies:

    -monkeys who grow up w/o parents but w/ peers

    -fearfulness

    -clinging

    -monkeys who are isolated:

  • first ½ year =social misfits
  • first year =unable to relate to others
  • à

    isolation during 1st ½ year is worse than 2nd ½ year of life

    -even after extensive rehabilitation

    à

    still had ‘signature stereotypies’

    Signature stereotypies =particular mannerisms developed as deprived infants)

    -human’s problems are more severe as their social life is more complex

    cultural diversity/common humanity

    -a lot of diversity/commonality

    à

    everyone agrees that the baby needs responsive care

    Example #1

    Gusii of Kenya: physically respond to crying baby

    U.S. moms: verbally respond to crying

    Example #2

    -Japanese mom: focuses on looking @ mom

    -U.S. mom: focuses on looking @ objects

    Note: you have to be careful w/ cross-cultural diff.

    à

    many differences in understanding attachment:

    i.e. Japanese kid might cry a lot when mom leaves

    à

    more than U.S. kid

    à

    but that is b/c they almost never experience seperation

  • the existence of other relationships doesn’t weaken the need for mom
  • *at first few months, emotions seem to be universal

    à

    by the end of first year, cultural diff. seen to make a diff. on emotions

    i.e. by 11 months, Chinese infants shown less emotional responsiveness to fear-inducing or frustrating experiences than Japanese/European/U.S.

    ->b/c that culture teaches to show emotional restraint

    Enhancing the quality if early care

    Study: early daycare in itself doesn’t cause more anxious/avoidant but rather if both parenting and day care are of poor quality

    -poor quality day care led to negative emotions/hostility

    à

    non-compliance

  • timing + quality of care are the most important factors

  • Enhancing quality of care

    2 approaches

  • services/treatment for family/kid
  • enhancing parenthood àthrough teaching/guiding responsive care.
  • Conclusion

  • intervention aiming at improving attachment relationship must address the infant/caregiver relationship as well as the surrounding context

  • Early impact

    -affects how children see world. Children experiences are not ‘remembered’, but rather set as a pattern of emotional/behavioral patterns.

    à

    change is possible –if ‘experience (for better or for worse) was not extreme.

    Class; mar 5, 2001

    Early childhood

    -defined as roughly 12-30/36

    à

    usage of symbols

    à

    symbolic distance

    à

    language

    -some think that that is the biggest stage of development in kids

    4 elements of language

    -kids seem to pick it up naturally

  • Phonetics –the basic sounds of the language. àbabies are born w/ inherent ability to pick up any language àby 4-5 months, they pick up the specific phonetics unique to its mother tongue
  • Semantics -word meaning/meaning of the whole phrase
  • Morphology –shapes that alter a set meaning. I.e. the s at the end of shapes does not have its intrinsic meaning, but has a meaning w/I a context
  • Syntax –how you put together the words
  • Pragmatism: how you use the language: i.e. tone/choice of words/etc

    Prelinguistic

    -crying =first communication

    -at around 2 months: -cooing

    à

    shows sartisfaction

    à

    basis of speech

    à

    based on satisfaction feeling of baby

    Vocal play

    -around 3-4 months

    Cannonized babbling

    -6 months

    -random babbling that sound like speech

    Conversational babbling

    10 months

    -in a style similar to speech

    à

    meaningless speech


    Protowords

    -sounds that don’t sound like real words but have a consistent meaning -i.e. ‘ma’ =mom

    chapter 7

    Language –abstract rule-governed system of arbitrary symbols that can be combined in countless ways to communicate information.

    Symbolic representation

    -the use of ideas/images/other symbols to stand for objects or events

    5 elements of language

    Phonology

    -the system of sounds used in language

    à

    usage of stress/intonation of words

    i.e. the difference b/w ‘b’ and ‘p’: ‘bat’/ ‘pat’

    à

    some not used in each language. I.e. rolling ‘r’ of spanich/clicking sounds of African languages

    à

    not in English

    Semantics: meaning of words/sentences

    -logic

    à

    not grammar

    à

    i.e. ‘daddy is having a baby’ is semantically incorrect

    Morphology

    Combining units of meaning into more complex words

    i.e.-un-speak-able

    -3 morphemes

    -each meaningful unit is called a morpheme

    Syntax

    -Grammar rules:

    i.e.

    Girl kiss boy

    boy kiss girl

    Girl boy kiss =incorrect syntax

    Pragmatism

    Productive/receptive skills

    Productive skills –put things into ideas

    Receptive skills –used to understand people

    -parents might overestimate the kid’s skills, but they’re right to assume that receptive skills develop b/f productive skills

    Example #1 young kids can tell the difference b/w l and w but won’t be able to pronounce the diff. clearly

    à

    receptive phonology is more advanced than productive phonology

    Example #2

    -Kids understand words that are not yet in their active vocabulary

    -kids understand more complex sentences than they use

    Major tasks in early language learning.

    Learning the sound pattern of a language

    Prelinguistic vocalization

    -sounds produced by infants during first year of life, b/f they begin to speak

    5 stages of Prelinguistic vocalization

    1)Crying

    -happends reflexively when overly aroused

    -->diff. kind of cries for diff. kinds of arousal

    2)Cooing

    -@ around 2 months

    -->expresses pleasure

    -->also beginning of laughing/chuckling

    3)Vocal play

    -4 months

    -babies play around w/ their range

    -->vary their pitch/loudness

    -->occasional simple syllable (i.e. ba/ga/ma)

    4)Canonical babbling

    -around 6 months

    -strings of syllables

    -->usually at first, it is a repetition of 1 syllable

    -->then a sting of various syllables

    -sounds increasingly like speech

    -not yet use of syllables unique to that language

    -->syllables used are quite universal at this stage (canonical babbling)

    5) conversational babbling/jargon

    -around 10 months

    -use of adult-like stress/intonation

    Protowords

    -appear around 10-12 months

    -vocalization w/ consistent meaning for this child

    -->but it still doesn't closely resemble adult's words

    -early vocalization mistakes are observed cross-culturally

    -'t' replaces 'k' sounds by accident

    -->i.e. 'tat' instead of 'cat'

    -->this mistake is also observed in German/Hindi

    Learning words and their meanings

    First word

    -first identifiable word -around 1st birthday

    -usually refer to familiar person (mama)/objects (ball/shoe)

    -could also express feeling (goodbye)/movement (up)

    -compound words -->usually not broken up

    Referential style

    -A style of early words use in which words primarily refer to objects/events

    Expressive style

    A style of early word usage that express social routine

    Referential children

    -learn words faster -->but no diff. in grammar

    -usually from more educated family

    -more likely to be firstborn

    -->referential mom uses language to label things

    -->Expressive mom uses language to direct kid's behavior

    Vocabulary growth

    -at first, new words are acquired slowly

    -by 18-19 months, an average of 50 words

    -->18 months =vocabulary spurt

    -Referential kids-->until now -mostly nouns -->most noticeable vocabulary spurt

    -Expressive kids: equal proportion of nouns and other kinds of words

  • Vocabulary spurt continues through preschool
  • -Preschoolers appear to acquire 5.5 new words a way

    10,000 by first grade

    40,000 by end of first grade

    -First words/vocabulary spurts range differs culturally/socio-economically

    Range:

    -First word: 10-17 months

    -Vocabulary spurt: 13-25 months

    Process of Word Learning

    -usage of word =b/f full grasp of word

    -->very context-bound

    -->w/ vocabulary spurt -words for 'categories' of words

    -->early words disappear at vocabulary spurt

    -->shows that it is not a true linguistic system

    Study

    -through intonation, baby could make out words from continuous flow of talking

    Segmentation

    when toddler makes a mistake breaking up the words

    i.e. 'readit the book'

    Fast-mapping

    A process of using context cues to reasonably accurately guess the meaning of an unknown, new word

    -->starts anywhere b/w 2-4 years

    Joint attention

    -the tendency of adult/language-learning toddler to share the same topic of attention

    à

    i.e. caregiver speaks to kid about something he's already paying attention to

    Study

    by as early as 16 months, baby can assume that the adults direction of gaze defines what he's labeling

    Whole object assumption

    -the infant's tendency to assume that the new word related to an object, as opposed to an attribute/event/action

    Lexical contrast

    -infant's assumption that no 2 words mean the same

    Errors in early word learning

    i.e. telling the kid to:

    -look at the ball

    -look, it's red

    Errors in early word learning

    Under-extension

    -language errors where the meaning attached to a wd is too restricted

    à

    i.e. thinking that 'truck' only applies to toy trucks and not to real trucks

    Overextension

    -language errors where the attaches meaning is too wide

    à

    i.e. thinking that 'truck' means any 4-wheeled vehicle

  • under-extensions =less obvious, since they are not so clearly apparent
  • Study:

    -more words in vocabulary =less overextension

    Note: -when a word is overextended, the kid could be doing it intentionally, since he has no other/better word

    -->Receptive overextension

    -i.e. when asked 'where’s the bus? Where’s the truck?'

    Common patterns of over/under-extensions

  • At first, learnt words are only used in specific contexts in which they're used
  • As child starts to explore words: -->'does word 'truck' mean any 4-wheeled vehicle?'
  • -->overextension

  • Some intentional overextension -->b/c it is the closest word he has
  • Higher vocabulary ==>less overextension


  • Morphological rules

    Grammatical morpheme:

    -'a unit if language that carries little meaning by itself, but changes meaning of words/sentences in a systematic way'

    -->includes prefixes/suffixes/auxiliary verbs/etc.

    -->i.e. adding 's' to make word plural

    English -->relatively few morphemes -->child only starts w/ them after combination of words into sentences

    Turkish/Russian -->more morphemes -->infants add grammatical morphemes earlier.

    Order of Acquisition

    Study

    -morphemes are acquired in a certain order

    -->though the speed of acquisition might be different

    Order

    1)first

    - ...s (to make plural

    - ...ing

    2)later

    ...ed (passed tense verbs)

    ...s (3rd person singular)

    3)last

    ...'s (to be - it's big/she's nice)

    Factors in order of acquisition

    -->not frequency of usage but rather other factors:

    Factors include:

    1)Grammatical complexity

    -simplest changes in words are learnt first

    -->words closest to active/declaritive form of word (i.e.'go')

    2)Semantic complexity

    ...ing =simple form of an ongoing act

    ...s (3rd person singular) =more complex

    -->we're talking about someone else in the singular persent!

    3)Phonological characteristics of a morpheme

    -i.e. Turkish kids learn morphemes faster b/c they have morphemes that are

  • Full syllables
  • Stressed
  • -->Easier to notice

    Productivity/over-regulation

    Productivity

    -children learn general rule of grammar (i.e. usage of ...ing/...ed)

    -->not word by word

    Over-regulation

    -application of general rules of language incorrectly to exceptions

    -by 6-7 years -almost fully correct

    -school-age children sometimes over-regulate

    à

    i.e.. I brang lunch -->not 'I brought lunch'

    -->those mistakes =not a regression but an emergemce of a ne wkind of thinking

    -->'growth error'

    Learning pattern

    -Kids automatically search of regularities

  • learn a few examples to which rules could be learnt out
  • learn regular/irregular forms as a diff. entity
  • filter our odd ones -->focus on regular rules
  • apply those rules to ALL words
  • Gradually, kids learn the exception
  • Learning to form sentences

    Syntax: language’s rules for organizing word sinto sentenxses

    -->need to know form class

    Form Class

    -Category of words in a language that can fill a similar syntactic role in forming phrases/sentences

    à

    i.e. verbs/adjectives/nouns/etc.

  • kids extract those rules from hearing
  • -->only much later are they able to explicitly relate to those grammatical rules

    The one word stage

    Holophase

    -a word that conveys the meaning of a whore phrase/sentence

    i.e. if a baby says 'mama'

    -->it could mean


    First sentences

    -18-24 months =first sentence

    -->soon after, vocabulary spurt

    -->but more related to verbs

    -at first, 2 words =2 diff. ideas

    à

    i.e. ‘car, daddy'

    First true sentence

    -usually composed of nouns/verbs/adjectives

  • some prepositions (a/the)
  • some conjugations (and/or)
  • some prepositions (of/by)
  • à

    at first, English speakers usually don't add grammatical morphemes

    Telegraphic speech

    -speech omitting non-essential words

    -->i.e. 'see teddy' -->could mean 'I see the teddy bear'

    ->still unclear

    à

    speech is still unclear ->parents mostly reply on gestures/facial expressions


    Further syntactic development

    -stages pointed out by Brown (1973)

    Stage # Average # of morphemes Description
    1 1à2 -roughly at 2 word stage

    -beginning of simple semantic/syntactic relations

    2 2à2.5 -acquisition of basic grammatical morphemes

    ài.e. suffix ‘s’ to make plural

    3 2.5à3 Simple sentences/questions.

    ài.e. ‘where’s mommy?’

    4 3à3.5 -beginning to embed one clause into another (i.e. subordinate clauses

    à ‘I see what you made’

    5 3.4à4 -combine simple sentences to make compound sentences

    à ‘I have cake and daddy has candy’


    Learning to use language socially

    communicative competence

    -the ability to carry on a conversation

    -recognize and repair breakdown in communication

    -uaw language in socially appropriate ways w/i a particular culture

    -develops in infancy -->i.e. caregiver's turn-taking, as mentioned earlier

    -by 1 year =turn-taking w/ conversational partner is well-established

    -2 year-old will attempt to repair breakdown

    -->understands where there is a lack of communication

    i.e. -responding to adults' request for clarification

    -restating requests that have not been fulfilled

    -learning communication differs cross-culturally.

    Things that western families teach their kids:

  • politeness words
  • greeting/leaving: hi/goodbye
  • routines: what to say/what not to say
  • Tone of Voice: 'don't speak that way to your sister
  • -in Japan, more politeness phrases =more emphasis on teaching them to kid

    The child and environment in language development

    -in toddlership (which spans roughly 1 1/2 years), development from few words to properly structures language

    Environmentalist theory

    -stresses environmental factors in language acquisition

    Nativist theories

    -stress the inborn, biologically based factors in language acquisition.

    Environmentalists:

    Skinner

    -parents condition kids to speak

    -->attention of parents reinforce baby along each step of speech development\

    -->eventually develops into speech

    Problem: observation shows that parents correct untrue more that grammatically incorrect phrases

    Nativists

    Noam Chomsky

    -the ability to combine so many/endless unique combinations of words can;t possibly be done through reinforcements

    -->reinforcements/imitation might help in speech learning but is not the reason for it.

    LAD (Language acquisition device)

    -innate capabilities to learn language

    -->specialized are of brain

    Problem: no focus on other areas of communication

    -->today, no developmental psychologist is either-or!!!

    Language acquisition

    Humans: biologically pre-disposed to learn language

    à

    language is learnt w/ little explicit teaching!

    Hemisphere specialization

    -the process of functions b/c specialized in specific areas on L/R side of Brain.

    -->there is a critical point to learning language!!!

    Stages of development/neural development

    8-9 months:

    -long range connection in cerebral cortex begin to form

    -adult-like metabolism

    2nd year

    -word spurt

    -->sharp increase in synaptic density

    -->increase in memory/info processing

    4 years

    -grammar development is basically complete

    -decrease of synaptic density/brain metabolism

    2nd language acquisition

    Study

    Chinese/Korean were taught English

    -if taught b/f age 7 =fluency =also in grammar rules

    -if taught after age 7 =decrease in competence

    =>perhaps 7 is the critical point?

  • some Chimpanzees have the ability to have simple syntax
  • -speech is species-specific to humans

    Some seemingly inborn capabilities

  • 7 months old: can detect rules/regularities in sequence of made-up words
  • 8 months old: can segment words from continuous stream of words
  • 9 months old: can break down speech into phrases and clauses

  • Lab experiment: preference to speech w/ pauses @ phrases/clauses than w/i them!!!

    -->built in pre-disposition to pay attention to perceptually salient stretches of speech

    -i.e. stressed syllables/beginning of word

    -->helps them key in on grammatical morphemes

    -There is also a built in constraint (conclusions that could be drawn) in learning speech

    -i.e. to seek out broad rules

    -->nouns/verbs/adjectives

    -->morphemes that reflect singular/plural

    -->assuming specific meaning for unknown/new words

    -Studies show correlation b/w cognitive development (i.e. symbolic representation) and language

  • 2 year old symbolic play is linked to 2 word sentences
  • 1-3 year old's ability to string words together linked to remembering sequences
  • 18 months =verbal spurt is linked to object permanence/the ability to categorize things into one of 2 categories

  • Environment of language learning

    -w/o exposure to language kid's can't learn to speak

    Child-directed speech (CDS)/motherese

    -the modifications adults make when speaking to young children

    CDS characteristics

  • simple grammatically
  • higher than normal speech/exaggerated intonations/fewer lapses in fluency
  • more clear marked phrases/clauses marked by pause/intonation
  • redundant speech: mother leads the conversation -->asks often for repetition
  • -->often includes questions about objects/events

  • Focus on object/event in present tense -->concrete nouns-->adult frequently comments on child's actions/child’s surroundings
  • -Fathers tend to speak to child diff. than mom

    -->asks for more labels/explanations

    (i.e. 'what's that'/'what does this do?')

    -->uses more advance vocabulary

    -->more breakdown of communication w/ secondary care-giving father

    Father: more likely to ignore utterance

    à

    Diff: probably b/c father spends less time w/ kid

    Sibling

    -also adjusts their speech to toddler

    Study: even 2-3 year olds make their speech simpler for an infant sibling

    Cross-cultural difference

    -in some cultures, CDS doesn't take place

    -->yet, the kids learn to speak at roughly the same time!!!

    Study: 4 months old babies prefer CDS to adult speech

  • CDS also role in adult-child relationship
  • Non-linguistic aspects of symbolic representation

    -According to Piaget, the main cognitive development of toddlership =emergency of symbolic thought

    Piaget:

  • a toddler’s first words are not symbols because they refer to the ‘here and now’
  • Baby starts to speak about things not right there and then at around 18-24 months àPiaget’s last of 6 sensorimotoric stages!
  • Toddler learns symbols through imitation
  • Symbols are a developmental outgrowth of Sensorimotor activities
  • 3 other non-language use of symbolic representation

  • Pretend play
  • Use of Gestures
  • Iconic symbols
  • 1)Toddlers’ pretend play

    Development of who the action is done on

    -16 month-old will play-drink from a toy cup.

    à

    self-directed

    -Later, he will pretend to ‘feed’ a doll w/ it.

    -Other-directed

    -by the end of the 2nd year, there is development of thematic play: building a block fence around animal toys

    à

    theme-directed

    --

    -With time, baby is able to use decreasingly realistic objects to symbolize other things:

    Steps of decrease of realistic symbols

    Replica object

    -14-19 months

    - An object directly reflecting the real object

    i.e.

  • dolls
  • toy horses
  • toy cars

  • Substitute objects

    -19-24 months

    -substitute objects increasingly used to represent an object

    i.e.

  • Block instead of car
  • Pillow instead of doll
  • Double substitution

    -only appears later in preschool

    i.e.

  • Using a pillow for a doll and a block as a bottle
  • Note: when with a ‘pretending partner’ (i.e. parent or a sibling), the pretending is more complex, usually b/c:

  • the other person, who is more skilled (by virtue of age) leads the toddler
  • the partner helps the toddler repeat the act several times
  • 2)Toddler’s Use of Gestures

    -communicative gestures, such as pointing, usually appear at around 9 months

    à

    usually accompanied by some sort of vocalization

    -conventional social gestures –appear b/w 9-12 months

    à

    i.e. nodding the head for a yes/waving bye-bye

    -symbolic gesture –by 12-18 months

    -i.e. putting thumb in mouth to represent a bottle

    Coordination of gestures/visual signals

    -12 months-old can’t follow id the adult is looking one way but pointing another

    à

    17-months-old can

    à

    18-months-old can point to one thing while looking at a person

    à

    Coordination b/w divergent signs usually happens w/ first word

  • b/w 10-18 months =increase in gestures
  • declines after 18 months until 24 months àvocabulary spurt
  • levels off at 24 months
  • Note: gesturing/vocabulary are 2 distinct, independent systems!

    Toddler’s understanding of Iconic symbols

    -i.e. pictures/model scales

    -9 months, babies are confused by pictures.

    à

    they try to understand what they portray

    -20 months-olds do not show this confusion/manual exploration

    à

    they seem to understand that the object portrayed is not really there

    study

    -when shown a picture of a room and where a toy is hidden in it:

  • 2 year olds couldn’t find toy in the real room
  • 2 ½ year olds could (80% of the time)
  • à

    This was different when 2 year old kids where shown the toy being hidden through a window.

    à

    the difficulty for them must be in connecting the symbol (picture/screen) w/ the real thing

    Scale model of room

    -2 ½ year-olds have difficulty finding a toy based on a scaled-down model of that room

    -3-year-olds can

    à

    if convinced that the scaled-down room is the same room, just shrunk down, the 2 ½ year old kid will also be able to find toy (since he doesn’t have to think of the scaled-down model as a symbol since that confuses him)

    Note the diff in terminology b/w infanthood and toddlership

    Chapter 8

    -As toddler gets older, the child not only moves to increasing self-reliance, but also gets socialized:

    Socialization

    Socialization:

    -The process where the child acquires rules/standards/values of the society

    -at first, socialization only involves living up to parent’s expectations

    à

    w/ time, child begins to internalize these standards

    à

    to incorporate them into the self

    à

    this second step takes place takes place in the preschool years and beyond

  • socialization, whether in family or daycare setting paves way for general respect for social order
  • -Socialization in western culture tries to do 2 things:

  • To move from neat-total reliance to self-reliance
  • To comply w/ social rules/expectations
  • -Socialization is different, depending on the specific culture.

    Two views of socialization

  • Socialization from the outside (i.e. Freud/early psychoanalysist)
  • Socialization from the inside (i.e. Barbara Rugoff)

  • Socialization from the outside

    Sublimation –Freud’s term for the redirection of blocked biological drives and impulses

    -Freud thought that as long as kid is not thwarted/overwhelmed by the anxiety/anger

    à

    then sublimation is a good thing

    -kid complies w/ those rules to maintain closeness w/ parent who has been associated w/ food/basic hunger

    -kids gets punished for bad behavior/rewarded for good behavior

    à

    thus they learn to behave in a way accepted by parents/society around him

    Modern theorists

    -less emphasis on direct learning

  • rather, the emphasis is on seeing others:
  • Socialization from the inside

  • Barbara Rugoff (1990)
  • Mary Ainsworth
  • -kids want to comply w/ parents’ requests and expectations

    à

    toddler enjoys pleasing his parents

  • This stems from:

  • -Ainsworth’s research shows that most kids behave that way

  • kids were shown to be compliant as young as 12 months and as old as 2
  • usually associated w/ secure-like attachments
  • -sometimes, kids are negativistic

    à

    very adamant about having their own way

    à

    sometimes called ‘terrible twos

    à

    usually couples w/ move to self-reliance (see erikson)

    Erikson

    -terrible two (adamant behavior) is usually coupled w/ move to self-reliance

    à

    the kid feels the want to exercise his newfound skills/autonomy.

    Ainsworth: kid has natural motivation to comply, as much as kid’s thrust towards independence

  • toddler is oppositional when his parent’s wishes are counter to toddler’s goals

  • -when toddler constantly/consistently ignores/opposes his parents’ wishes, a problem could develop

    à

    this is not in the toddler’s nature

    à

    will be discussed later in this chapter

    Major Developments in the toddler period

    -beyond socialization, there are other social/emotional developments in toddlership:

  • increased independence from parents/self-reliance
  • increased sociability/increased form of social interaction
  • increased awareness of self/others
  • broader range of emotional responses
  • 1)Moving towards independence

    -in toddler period

    à

    marked decline in closeness w/ parents

    à

    mobile toddlers readily separate from caregiver to explore

  • when those toddlers initiate the separation, they could venture quite far
  • -occasionally, toddler will return to caregiver, and return to exploration

    à

    but most contact will psychological: look/smile/exchange words

    à

    contact is no longer only physical !!!!

    -this skill of taking cues across distance might lead to a cycle of making toddler increasingly independent.

    ->shows that organization of behavior regarding caregiver could remain consistent even though behaviors may change (see box ‘Organization of Behavior’)

    compared w/ infants, toddlers show:

  • less distress in lab setting when caregiver briefly leaves.
  • Settle down quicker when they return
      1. By 18 months, most children acquire the expectation that caregiver will alleviate stress àcould be comforted more easily
      2. Caregiver explains departure, making the kid less distressed
        1. What you can’t do w/ infant due to lack of linguistic/cognitive

    -at the same time that toddlers b/c more comfortable w/ separation from caregiver, they show mastery over objects

    -i.e. turning to them for assistance


    2)Growth of Sociability

    -w/I toddler period –more social interaction w/ adults/kids

    -compared w/ infants, toddlers have expanded capacity to observe/interpret/imitate others’ actions as well as maintain a sequence of social interaction.

    à

    they seem interested in interacting w/ others, especially w/ peers

    Sharing experiences

    -toddlers have a behavior characteristic: constant effort to share objects that they discover w/ others

  • Illustrates general sociability
  • Reveals and increases social awareness/rudimentary ability to take another person’s perspective

  • Affective sharing –the Toddler’s sharing of positive emotions w/ caregiver

    àtoddler won’t assume that the other person sees the object until he sees a response, such as a smile

    àdirected almost exclusively to attachment figures

    Social referencing

    Social referencing –taking cues from others, such as facial expressions, in order to interpret novel situation

    Study

    -baby put on a glass 1 foot off the ground àbaby didn’t know what to do. Experimenter tells mo what facial expression to do. If mom smiles, he precedes. If she has a frightened face, kid doesn’t precedes.

    Note:

    baby takes cues in the

    ambiguous cases

    Interaction Between Toddlers

    -b/w. 15-24 month, the baby develops the ability to behave in a complementary way w/ a peer

    àemergence of games (which are usually rooted in imitation

    -the game usually precedes w/ 1 toddler doing something àthe other imitates and then back and forth, they imitate each other.

    à

    much more positive emotions/complexity than infants are able to.

    More complex playing w/ familiar playmate than w/ unfamiliar playmate

    à2 year-olds can distinguish b/w playmates

    -most of the interactions b/w young toddlers revolve around objects

    ài.e. both toddlers play w/ the same set of blocks

    àbut they rarely focus on same theme:

    ài.e. one builds a tower where one makes an unrelated road

    -by 3 years, shared themes b/c more prominent.

    -pretend play emerges (instead of solitary play) w/ interrelated roles:

    -i.e. Dr. and patient

    -foundations of friendships/peer relationships are laid down in toddler interaction as well as toddler-caregiver interactions that preceded them

    àbut they aren’t able to form true friendships/continuing relationships w/ peers

    àonly in preschool age do children show diff. b/w playmates and friends

    Awareness of self and others

    -self-awareness - emerges in toddlers

    -->i.e. if they can make mental representations of themselves, they could also make mental representation of themselves

    study: by 20 months (sometimes as early as 18 months) babies can recognize themselves in the mirror

    -->i.e. a red spot was put on their nose -->then they were shown in the mirror

    -->if they reached directly for their face ->they could understand that the thing they saw in the mirror was themselves

    3/4 of the 21-23 months babies

    1/4 of 15-18 months babies

    none of 9-12 babies

    -there is a relationship b/w self-recognition and general cognitive development

    -->i.e. Downs syndrome kids start touching face at diff. age, dep. on level of retardedness

    -beginning of the use of word 'I'

    Understanding of Others

    Study:

    -18/19 month old babies who prefer crackers to broccoli

    -adult experimenter showed disliking face at crackers

    -->the baby knew to give the adult broccoli and not crackers

    Dennie Wolff

    : there are 3 stages in development of this understanding:

    1) - at age 1, baby is able to recognize that it cant do everything, that others can

    -->i.e. when playing peek-a-boo, baby is surprised to see mom's face still covered when he uncovers his face

    2) -during 2nd year, baby understand boundary b/w their actions and others' actions

    -->dev. of genuine turn-taking

    -->in peek-a-boo, baby might pull mom's hands off her face when playing peek-a-boo

    3) -end of second year, child understands that each person is an independent agent

    -->each person has a separate role

    -

    i.e. in younger kids, they might jump out of hiding b/f they're found (blurred diff. b/w seeker and hider)

    -->by age 2, the kid might run in an opposite was as seeker comes near -->some knowledge of people's roles/aims/intentions

    -

    i.e. kids might want to do more things by themselves: might start battles that will typify the 'terrible twos'

    -->kid increasingly realizes his 'own' abilities.

    -awareness of self/others also leads to understanding of possession

    -->child is less likely to grab an object from another person

    -->more likely to negotiate for it.

    -->more likely to return object (i.e. toy) after a peer has been playing with it earlier

    Emotional changes

    Social-awareness helps Emotional dev.

    more emotions regarding self-consciousness (i.e. shame

    new level of relating to other people -->emergence of social rules/standards

    Feelings/social sensitivity/beginning of morality

    -by middle of 2nd year -->sensitivity to social demands

    -->i.e. understanding that some things are foridden

    -related to that is behavioral control:

    i.e.

    child may stop forbidden act/hesitate/restart/ and then stop

    they may engage in the forbidden behavior while looking at the caregiver


    *Awareness of standards of behavior = hallmark of toddler period

    -->stems from the ability to understand that things are not as they should be.

    -

    i.e. uncertainty/distress at a flawed object/external condition can't be met/can't do something as they're told to do

    -->signs of emergence of empathy: i.e. approaching those who are in pain.

    -at this stage, emotions are still very primitive/undifferentiated.

    -->i.e. same response to parental disprovement as when performance standard not being met (i.e. peas roll off their fork)

    -by the end of the second year -toddlers respond diff. to diff. negative emotional signals.

    Deviation anxiety

    -toddler's distress over it doing something forbidden

    self-corrections usually accompanied by words.

    -->i.e. when kid goes to a place forbidden by parens, he migth say 'no!, Can't!' as he leaves

    -at this stage, all the standards are externally imposed by the adults

    -adherence is almost always dependant on adult presence

    Changing emotions/New emotions

    -during toddler period -some previously existing emotions are fundamentally changed

    -->more organization of action during emotional arousal

    -->i.e. baby might laugh at an adult chasing him, yet continue running

    -Awareness of other/self helps kid express direct feelings to others

    ->i.e. kid might show anger/joy at caregiver

    might show deliberate opposition to caregiver when angered

    hug caregiver even when not upset: prototype of love

    Important new toddler period emotions:

    -feelings are still very fragile

    1)Shame -an emotion in which the self feels exposed/vulnerable/bad

    --> kid might feel the whole self is dissolving -->especially w/ degrading/harsh punishment

    2)Positive self-evaluation

    -an emotion in toddlers that is the forerunner of pride

    -->kid might feel a whole encompassing sense of pleasure

    -in preschool period, those emotions will extend to standard that the kid himself has established

    -another name for these emerging emotions:

    Self-conscious emotions

    Self-conscious emotions: emotions that require objective sense of self and some understanding of standards of behavior

    -

    'secondary emotions' -->qualitatively diff than the infant's feeling (joy/fear/anger/surprise)

    i.e. embarrassment/shame

    -->study: kids who recognize themselves in the mirror: more liekly to show these emotions

    Parent-Toddler relationship

    Double role of parents during period

    support child’s exploration of the world

    set appropriate limits for the child

    -most developmentalists think that setting limits is just as important as providing encouragement to explore

    àoften done verbally àcommands/comments/questions

    àusually starts at around 12-18 when the child has his vocabulary spurt

    Scaffolding -the process in which the parents support the child in new tasks by offering developmentally appropriate guidance/hints/advice

    Guided self-regulation – the ability of toddler to regulate their own behavior w/ guidance from caregiver

    Asked in Class: what is the diff. b/w

    scaffolding and

    guided self-regulation? And how does it tie into temperament?

    Answer

    : cognitive/symbolic teaching that parents teach kids. The self-regulation is a very general idea, that relates to any area of life, like physiology/cognitive/etc.

    Note: the important thing is the general approach towards child-rearing ànot specific practices

    i.e. it doesn’t really matter when the child stops weaning/toilet-trained. What does matter is the parental guidance consistency of limits

    what parents do to foster a desirable behavior is at least important as what they do to discourage an undesirable behavior

    process of socialization from the inside (kid’s desire to comply from the inside/to accept their values/standards) is facilitated by warm/supportive family relationships

    Changes in care-giving during the toddler period

    -universally, the care of children changes dramatically during toddler period

    i.e. in many cultures, after infancy, as child b/c mobile, other people, besides mom (i.e. friends/adult kid/sibling) take an active role in toddler’s care/supervision

    Example

    -in western cultures, father much more involved in child’s rearing in toddler period

    àmore in play/challenging the kid than in care/nurture

    Study

    -study in Germany showed that this challenge was directly related to kid’s later ability to cope w/ negative feelings

    father’s increasing emotional support may make increasing psychological separation from mom easier

    having 2 caregivers w/ somewhat diff. Styles of interaction could be an advantage for the kid

    Individual adaptation: the roots of personality

    -in toddler period, awareness of self leads to diff

    patterns of adaptation

    patterns of adaptation –the individual style of responding to others and to the environment; which eventually forms the root of personality.

    -

    i.e.

    some toddlers might develop positive attitudes/expectations of the self

    others will develop negative feelings negatively

    some will show proficiency in handling emotions

  • others will be overwhelmed by them

    -individual way of responding =

    patterns of adaptation

    Becoming a separate person

    Separation-individuation process

    -dev. by Margaret Mahler

    -child’s psychological separation from caregiver and growing awareness of being an individual

    -as child moves from caregiver and experiences doing things by himself , they increasingly understand that their actions are separate from the caregivers’ actions and that they are independent

    -this process is not smooth for every child:

    à

    Erikson: when child’s sense of self begins to emerge and he is faced w/ parental limits, there is a potential develop either

    sense of independence/competence

    self-doubt/shame by parents

    à

    autonomy vs. self doubt

    -another factor affecting the smoothness of separation-individuation:

    basic trust

    when it’s strong: toddler can seek autonomy and feel secure

    Sander: describes the toddler’s balancing b/w autonomy and emotional support from parents:

    -child does not seek exclusive self-reliance, but rather a balance of both self-reliance and emotional support of parents

    if the toddler knows that the attachment relationship is secure: he will feel free to explore to the fullest

    this confidence is product of child’s history of interaction w/ caregiver

  • àparent’s reliability during infancy breeds a basic trust which later enables the toddler to make initiatives towards independence

    i.e. their bid for independence (and occasional running into parental limitation) does not destroy their trust/relationship w/ parent = healthy self-reliance

    But: in less secure relationship w/ caregiver (

    i.e. kid is anxious about caregiver’s availability), and when:

    autonomy is being forced on them too early (under-protective)

    independence is view negatively (overprotective)

    àcompromises self-reliance

    Compromise of Self-reliance could be seen in:

    power struggles

    timidity

    continued preoccupation w/ caregiver

    angry interactions

    lack of emotional interest in mastery

    general emotional detachment

    Influence of parent-child relationship

    Attachment History

    -studies show a clear association b/w quality infant-caregiver relationship and how well the child will function as a toddler

    study

    -children’s attachment quality to mother measured at 12/18 months and then again at 2 years.

    -kids given 4 problems that require simple tools.

    first 2 problems =easy

    2

    nd 2 problems = hard àbeyond capacity of almost all of the 2-year-olds

    -mother present in all the cases

    Experimenters looked for:

    Kid’s emotional response/enthusiasm/ability to face challenges w/o getting frustrated

    Persistence/flexibility towards task

    Child’s ability to call on mother when needed

    Also measured timing/clarity of mother’s cues/emotional support she showed

    Results

    2 year olds who have been securely attached as infants (and therefore confident in caregiver’s availability)

    More positive emotions/less frustration

  • More persistent and flexible

    Cooperated w/ mom to reach a solution


    toddlers who had insecure attachment during infancy àmaladaptive responses

    intermittently clingy/dependent

  • whiny/prone to tantrums

    quick to get frustrated

  • quick to get into conflict w/ mother àproblem-solving goes into the background

    no enthusiasm/pleasure in the problem-solving

  • ignore/refuse to act to mother’s clues

  • i.e. mom said: ‘get the block’

  • kid takes block and puts in on the floor instead of on the board

    Ongoing Parental support

    -attachment didn’t

    cause the diff. in toddlers

    àattachment is only 1 factor

    àanother is parent’s support/stimulation

    during toddler period.

    when caregivers are emotionally available/provide consistent/clear guidance

    àtoddlers tend to be more eager/persistent/resourceful

    Note: -b/c of parental consistency, its hard to distinguish b/w effects of parenting on early parenting to that of later parenting

    i.e.

    Parents of securely attached children –more likely to be supportive of toddlers in problem solving (such as those in the above experiment)

    more adjustment of behavior to fit child’s scenario

    let children proceed on their own until the end of their resources

    then àincrease in clues

    àthen direct help if necessary

    if parent saw that frustration will take place àtook steps to avoid it

    studies show that such anticipatory behavior is more effective w/ toddlers than full-blown problems to arise

    Parents of Anxious/Avoidant-attached children

    Parents fail to increase help w/ struggle to solve problem

    Remain uninvolved, regardless of the increase in difficulty of task

    anxious-restraint parents: showed more help, but it b/c decreasingly appropriate/clear

    àparent/child both b/c more frustrated as pressure of the situation mounted

    Generally: secure-attachment’s parents:

    clear in the help that they give

    unlike insecure children’s parents: no

    clear guidelines

    very clear in establishing limits

    firm in maintaining them once those limits are set

    àdiff. in caregiver behavior during toddler period àpredictive of the child’s later functioning

    How children affect their own adaptations

    -some researchers: children’s inborn capabilities affect how parents behave towards them

    such as:

    seriously-ill kids

    premature

    born w/ drug addictions/other problems (stemming from mother’s use of drugs during pregnancy)

    such children often show maladaptation as toddlers


    -early neurological damage may contribute to those outcomes

    àmay affect caregivers’ behaviors, which in turn affects kid’s behavior

    àvicious cycle

    baby’s inborn tendencies

    To what degree foes baby’s characteristics affect parent’s behavior towards it?

    ànot clear!

    -baby’s characteristics b/c stable during toddler period

    activity level

    intensity of emotional responses

    degree of boldness/inhibition

    -more cohesion of behavior:

    temperament gets more correlated w/ security of attachment

    attachment history and temperament

    together give a more compete picture of child

    organismic specificity- the phenomenon where kids of diff. temperament characteristics respond diff. to same situation

    -such diff. in toddlers’ responses can affect how parents behave to them:

    kids perceived as agreeable/compliant -->caregiver: less limits/discipline

    encourages further agreeable behavior

    kids perceived as difficulty prompt harsh caregiving

    negative cycle!!!

    Forms of negative cycles:

    kid who needs more support/consistent handling [perhaps b/c attachment issues] (when parents have more difficulty being consistent w/)

    kid is detached when parents are increasingly distant:

    cooperation less likely

    Individual Adaptation and the broader Development Context

    -the cycle of parent-child interaction is not in a vaccum!

    -->surrounding context includes:

    social environment: other adults/children

    i.e.

    -stress is usually bad for caregiver-child relationship

    -->but social support from others, such as extended family could alleviate it.

    Example: loss of job = stressor. A spouse’s emotional/practical support w/ child helps.

    Potential affect of stress on quality of care

    -

    alleviation of stressor: improvement of quality of attachment

    -

    application of stressor: regression of quality of attachment

    Parental abuse and neglect of Toddlers

    -parent might b/c frustrated w/ child’s exploration or might misunderstand child [as being intentionally naughty]

    àpunish child too severely

    -others, might find parenting too overwhelming, give up and neglect child

    àtoddler has not yet learnt to avoid maltreatment or meet their own needs, making them vulnerable to abuse/neglect

    Problems related to child maltreatment

    -hard to determine b/c there are other associated factors such as family stress/poverty

    -social withdrawal/aggression/other social problems àcorrelates w/ maltreatment

    Symptoms:

    social withdrawal

    aggression

    low self-esteem

    problems describing one own’s feelings/actions

    emotional problems, such as: uncontrollable anger/inability to experience pleasure

    apathy to challenges

    difficulty balancing desire to explore w/ the need to feel secure

    most problems go into adulthood


    Forms of abuse

    physical neglect

    physical abuse

    emotional unavailability

    verbal abuse

    sexual abuse

    Physical neglect

    -failure to meet child’s basic needs for food/warmth/cleanliness/medical attention

    Physical abuse

    -Deliberately causing a child physical injury

    promotes

    avoidant/disorganized attachment relationships

  • aggression w/ peers/lack of social sensitivity

    blunted emotions

    Emotional unavailability

    -A chronic lack of parental involvement/emotional responsiveness

    Verbal abuse

    -continually criticizing/yelling/subjugating children to demeaning comments

    Sexual abuse

    -mistreating a child in a sexual way

    Searching for causes of Maltreatment

    Characteristics of the child

    -very little real evidence to show that the characteristics of the child is a major cause in abuse

    àin some cases, a difficult child (i.e. seriously ill/hard to care for) may add to already overstressed parents, leading to maltreatment

    àbut here, the cause is the cumulative stress of parents ànot the kids nature

    maltreated child could b/c a difficult child, b/c a vicious cycle

    but the child’s behavior is in effect is learnt behaviors àproducts of maltreatment

    Characteristics of the parent

    -vast majority of abusive parents suffer no psychotic disorder

    no single personality trait that abusive parents share

    àbur rather a broad set of adult’s characteristics

    Associated w/

    low self esteem

    poor impulse control

    doubts about personal power

    negative emotions

    antisocial behavior


    Environmental context

    -while abuse happens w/I a larger environmental contexts ànot only w/I parent-controlled environment

    Likelihood increases w/:

    poverty

    social isolation

    lack of education

    In poverty families:

    -abuse is more likely w/ stressors, like:

    frequent household moves

    job loss

    serious illness

    Social (environmental) context

    -Society is a form of environmental influence

    -in American culture, lots of violence in movies/TV/Books

    àmore accepted as a tool for problem-solving/teaching people lessons

    -in cultures where violence is not shown to that extent (i.e. Japanese/Native American) àchild abuse is virtually unknown

    -where the families lives as an extended family, (i.e. Natives) àmuch less abuse

    àmore social support

    àalso true for poor neighborhood where group-solidarity is high àgreat deal of community support!

    Importance of toddler period

    primitive sense of self

    patterns of emotional regulation/expression emerge

    toddlers

    particularly vulnerable to family/cultural influence

    beginning of major patterns of thought/feeling/behavior, as learnt from interaction w/ people

    supportive relationship w/ caregiver àself-worth/empathic members of society

    abusive relationship w/ caregiver ->feeling of self-worthlessness/indifferent to social relationships

    Note: we have the ability to change the disposition set on us during toddler period later in life!



    Factors that increase risk of abuse

    Long-term vulnerability factors
    1. poverty/ongoing stress
    2. Parental history of abuse
    3. Unfulfilled relationship needs
    4. Lack of understanding of the child as a complex individual

    Long-term protective factors
    1. nurturing care by someone in childhood
    2. good relationship w/ souse
    3. awareness of one’s own inner needs

    Current challenges:
    1. relationship instability
    2. Violence/alcoholism/drug-abuse in the home
    3. Lack of social support
    4. Job-loss or other acute stressors

    Short term buffers
    1. reduction of stress
    2. separation from abusive partner
    3. child entry into school
    4. Crisis counseling



    Chapter 9

    preschool/early childhood

    -early childhood: 2½ -5 years old

    -->

    preschool

    Characteristics of the preschool period:

    Asks many questions; because:

    lack of info

  • simplistic thinking

    emergence of mental representation

    can think of things that aren’t there

    consequence of things w/o carrying them out

    Attempt to understand world

    more advances linguistics that the simple sentences of toddlers

    beginning of active participation in development

    interplay b/w child’s development capacity and environment

  • playing grocery-shopping w/ friend who plays the grocer enhances script for shopping, which in return helps general social abilities

    but still , over-regulation (just like toddlers

    -->i.e.: airplane ‘

    goes


    Centrism: the tendency to consider only 1 piece of info when multiple pieces apply

    i.e. kid can consider only the cart ahead but not cars beside

    Appearance-reality problem: tendency to define reality by surface appearances

    i.e. when a colored filter covers an object, the kid doesn’t realize that the filter is shading the obj. a diff color, but is really the original color

    Egocentrism: Inability to take perspective of another person

    Preoperational period

    -

    Piaget theory: ages 2-7

    Characterized by lack ability to use of logical operations

    -->yet they can reason beyond Sensorimotor world of infancy

    -->lack of logical consistency

    i.e. mental representation

    -->yet lack of logical consistency

    Reasoning about causation

    Piaget: asked kids about how clouds move

    Level 1

    -External superficial appearance

    i.e. in movement: close obj. seem to move; yet far obj. don’t.

  • assumption of child: they must be moving w/ me!

    Level 2

    -Omnipotent power: God/parent control objects/events

    Level 3

    -some usage of natural phenomenon, but still quite creative/improbably:

  • i.e. ‘sun’s rays move the clouds’

    Level 4

    -Beginning of adult reasoning

    -->but not quite as complex

    See page 308-9 for examples of the levels

    Debate about mature reasoning

    Piaget: mature reasoning about causation –only in middle childhood

    Other studies: depends on the complexity/familiarity

    -->the more simple/familiar to the kid = the more mature explanation he will give

    Note: children lack an abstract idea of what seems plausible -->fanciful explanations

    -acquiring specific causes =gives foundation for development of abstract reasoning.

    -the more mature explanation = abstract concept of plausible cause

    Reasoning about living/non-living

    Animism: Piaget: tendency of young children to attribute life to non-living things

    Piaget thought that kids thought that anything that moved =alive

    -i.e. bike/cloud

    later research: child knows that not all movement=alive -->the kid just doesn’t know where to draw the line

    later research:

    A child as young as 3 understands that animals move by themselves and nonliving things move as a result of external forces, incl. human intervention.

    By age 4:

    realization that living things grow and non-living things don’t

    non-living things get worn/living things don’t

  • but still, the child doesn’t have a full understanding of implication of diff. b/w living/non-living. I.e.

    Reasoning about quantity

    -appearance-reality problem/lack of memory are the biggest barriers

    beginning of the concept of

    conservation

    Conservation: the idea that an amount of something remains the same despite changes in its form/shape/appearance

    Concepts of conservation include:

    Conservation of liquid volume: total amount of liquid remains the same despite being poured into diff. containers

    Conservation of number: the quantity of items remain the same, despite repositioning

    Conservation of mass: the mass remains the same, regardless of shape:

    i.e.. whether you make the clay into a ball or a block.

    Conservation of length: length of something remains the same whether it is straight/bent/

    Note:

    Child don’t acquire all of them at once

    Depends on environment:

    Mature understanding of them doesn’t emerge until middle childhood

    Conservation of liquid

    Piaget’s famous experiment:

    -take 2 equally shaped cups. Fill them w/ equal amount of water.

    when asked, kids would say that they have an equal amount of water

    àthen, pour water from 1 cup into a longer/narrower cup

    younger kids don’t realize that there is same amount of water, despite the appearance of the water to rise

    à

    appearance-reality problem!.

    Stage 1

    –ages 3-4

    -the children are ‘

    non-conservers

    -children judge volume by height

    Stage 2

    –ages 5-6

    -

    transitional period

    -kids are less decisive about which has more liquid

    àthey wonder if height/width makes a diff.

    àusage of some reasoning: i.e. ‘when you pour the water back, it is the same volume! ’

    àthey try to find a consistent answer

    àthey are not sure about themselves

    Stage 3

    –age 7

    -

    mature conservation

    àthey answer swiftly and correctly

    -they state the younger kids (who answered incorrectly) are ‘dumb’

    àage 7 àbeginning of middle childhood

    Mature conservation answers included:

    Compensation

    ‘This one is higher, but narrower, and that one is shorter but wider, so they are both the same

    Reversibility

    ‘when you pour it back, it’ll be the same again’

    Identity

    ‘it’s still the same water’

    nothing was added or subtracted:

    ‘you only poured it into a diff. glass’

    study –

    Brenner

    case: screening the containers so that the kid won’t see the cups and have an

    appearance-reality problem.

    -this made a diff in stage 2, where the kids almost had all the skills to solve this problem, and this pushed them over the last hump

    -older preschoolers/young elementary-schoolers could be taught to solve a problem using combined skills àthe have learnt to coordinate the acquired cognitive skills

    àyounger ones can’t

    Concept of numbers

    -progresses incredibly in preschool years

    awareness on number of items present:

    i.e. how subtraction/addition/rearrangement affects # of items

    Study

    -2 row of 7 coins spread equally

    àkid agrees they are equal in #

    àthen # is spread out àpreschoolers make an

    appearance-reality problem mistake, claiming the longer row has more coins

    Note: in 4 year olds: conservation of # task is successfun in cases of small # of items, such as 2 or 3

    Understanding the effects of addition/subtraction

    -some studies show that preschoolers have some knowledge of addition/subtration using small numbers

    Study

    -Gelman

    2 plates

    1 w/ a row of 2 mice

  • other w/ a row of 3 mice

    -examiner tells kids that the plate w/ 3 mice is the winner

    àbut didn’t specify whether b/w length of row or the # of mice

    àwhen shuffled, the kids were supposed to say whether a place is a winner plate or not

    àthen altered the row length/number

    -study showed that even 3-4 year olds define winner by # and not by length

    àkids couldn’t see the 3-mouse plate (that had 2 since one was removed) as a winner. They said that one mouse would have to be added to make it a winner plate

    Study -

    cooper

    -showed that 2-7 year olds had some basic rule:

    subtraction decreases #/addition increases #

    -kids was shown 2 group of objects.

    Equal in size

    Differed by 1

    Differed by 2

    The experimenter then adds or subtracts an obj.

    Results:

    Stage 1

    2-3 year olds

    -ignored initial # of objects, but rather said that the one whose item had been removed has less/been added had more

    à

    Primitive rule: a rule that lacks sophistication

    Stage 2

    -4-5 year olds

    -used

    qualitative rule

    àtook into account the quality of the initial group, but not the #

    ài.e. if the first 2 groups had 5/7, then when adding one to the 5 group, the 4-5 year old thought they were same length

    àtook into account the length [to some degree] but not #

    Stage 3

    -6-7 year olds

    -

    quantitative rule –took account magnitude of any diff. in the initial groups

    àthose 3 stages related to Piaget’s conservation of # theory

    àsupports Piaget’s theory that number conservation is related to general # understanding

    àonce you’ve mastered # conservation, you’ve reached Piaget’s

    stage 3

    Problem

    àbut many studies show that’s begin process of acquisition of # earlier, and that this process lasts longer than Piaget thought

    Learning to count

    -begins in early preschool

    -helped by TV programs such as

    Sesame Street.

    -by early childhood, kid can count to 5 or 6 accurately

    àbut they still make some odd mistakes

    Example of odd mistake

    -one kid seemed to be counting the fingers of his hand. Then, holding the experimenter’s index finger, the kid said it was 4 (i.e. he was giving fingers names àhe couldn’t see numbers beyond the fingers)

    5 principles in learning to count

    As identified by: Gelman/Gallistel

    One-to-one principle

  • Associating an obj. of the set w/ one and only 1 # name

    i.e. 2-3 year olds have difficulty w/ this counting more than 3 or 4 objects

    try to keep track by pointing

  • count faster than the fingers go, and therefore might:

  • count same object more than once

  • skip objects that are not in a row.

    Stable-order principle

  • that numbers go in a certain name order

    àlack of full understanding of this could lead to things like leaving out a specific number name when counting, such as ‘seven’

    -young children have a stable-order until 3

    àstable-order expands during preschool period.

    Cross-culture:

    in some cultures, where # names relate to body parts

  • they will learn early number names faster, but will learn abstract number skills later

    in others, numbers w/ decimals are said ‘ten-one’ instead of ‘eleven’

  • develops abstract number skills earlier

    Cardinal principle

  • The understanding that the final number of the set is the total # of objects

    -i.e. when asked how many objects are present, will count to four and only then say that there are 4 obj.

    Karen Wynn: kids master this by around 3 ½

    à3 year-olds can master it w/ 2 or 3 objects but no more àsometimes 4

    Study:

    cardinal principle is even more apparent at age 4

    -4 year old might miscount intentionally in order to make their counting consistent w/ their judgment that one row is longer than another

    àthis phenomenon only makes sense, if we assume that they understand the cardinal principle

    Abstraction theory

  • The idea that any set of objects are countable

    I.e. the kid is willing to count anything, real or imaginary, or even be willing to count a set w/ totally diff. categories of things. (i.e. animate/inanimate obj.)

    Order-irrelevant principle

  • the realization that it doesn’t really matter in what order you count the objects

    -i.e. if kid asked to count a set of obj. more than once, he might will count them in diff orders

    àBy age 5, a kid is explicitly able to state that order is irrelevant

    àby end of pre-school period, the kid has understanding of these 5 principles abd use them appropriately

    Concept of measurement

    -Piaget thought that conservation was required to understand measurement

    Problem: kids have intuitive grasp of measurement b/f the correctly solve conservation problems

    Other studies show:

    Preschoolers would cut a string in ½ by folding in the middle

  • Divide many cookies in 2 by separating them, a pair at a time

    Nevertheless:

    -kids will still make mistakes in comparing 2 apparently diff. measurements.

    ài.e. same amount of water in 2 differently shaped cups

    àbut w/o this distraction, they could do reasonably well on simple tasks.

    but their concept of measurement is still simple, like addition/subtraction

    àit still seems

    qualitative

    Summery

    preschoolers usually don’t show an understanding of quantities that are conserves, despite changes in appearance, since they focus on 1 stimulus

    usually the height of the container/length of row

    Teaching could lead to a stable cognitive skill, but not b/f kid has cognitive framework to which this skill can fit into

    Preschoolers show considerable sophistication in reasoning in small numbers

    Preschoolers’ quantitative reasoning is immature, but is not random: they follow rules in solving quantitative problems àit is merely the nature of their rules that change.

    Reasoning about Classes and Logical Relations

    -Piaget focused on 3 skills of preschooler’s emerging logical skills:

    Classification: the ability to group things by shared characteristics, such as size/shape

    Seriation: the ability to arrange things into a logical progression, such as suze or shape

    Transitive Inference: the ability to infer the relationship b/w 2 objects by knowing their respective relationship to a third object.

    -Piaget seemed to underestimated their skills ànew studies show more complete picture:

    àthese above skills are hampered by appearance-reality problems and memory limitations

    Classification

    The child is starting to put things into

    classes

    Class: any event/obj. that is treated in the same way b/c they have features are the same.

    Question:

    -When do kids start classifying?

    Answer

    Piaget

    -Gives kids toys of 2 shapes (circle/squares)/2 colors (red/blue)

    -

    conclusion: younger preschoolers

    sometimes: divide obj. by 1 dimension: by color

    or shape

    àsome sorting mistakes, i.e. 3 year-olds would sort by color; then they would switch and sort by dimension the last object [according to the previous obj.]

    Later studies

    -2-dimensional classification could be improved in kids w/ training

    Note: when given explicit rules in sorting things, they show the same limitations that Piaget notes, but are able to consistently sort along 1 dimension at an

    earlier stage

    Some studies show:

    Age 2 ½: can tell what simple category a picture goes into: i.e. is it a bird or a cat?

    àthen, if given an explicit rule of sorting: ‘put bird pictures here/cat pictures there’: they sort

    randomly

    àeven after reinforcement/helping

    Age 3: can follow rules consistently, but will have problems switching from one to another rule (i.e. sorting color, and then sorting shapes)

    Age 4: can switch rules w/ no problem

    Seriation

    Piaget: seriation shows a cognitive skill required to appreciate #/measurement

    àasks kids to arrange sticks in order of shortest to longest

  • if the kid succeeded, he was given a stick of equal length to a present stick and asked to put it into appropriate order

    Early preschoolers: could find smallest/largest but not those in the middle

    By age 6 or 7, most children could find the correct place easily and construct a series as well as inserting the additional stick into already present series.

    Adult thinking

    -put the smallest stick at one and of the array and continue from there.

    Preschool thinking

    -

    trial and error – put the sticks randomly and only then chick to see if they’re put correctly.

    àthey is why they correctly could deal w/ this task w/ only 3 or 4 sticks

    Note: Preschoolers must

    see the whole array to know if it is right or not à

    centrationp

    -See left of p. 319

    Order of stick study development

    Young preschoolers: put sticks randomly

    Older preschoolers: put the sticks w/ their tops higher than the previous one regardless of their bottom length (actual length

    B/w 5-7 the kid is able get is right

    Note: The older mistakes make the centration mistake: they are only able to focus on 1 factor: the top end of the stick and not the whole stick

    Transitive inference

    If a=b and b=c

    Then, transitive inference says that a=c

    If Mickey is taller than Bryan, and Bryan is taller than Justin, than transitive inference says that Mickey is tallest of the 3

    Piaget: kids don’t know this until middle childhood

    Other studies: kids acquire this earlier

    Study:

    Trabasso

    -Even 4 year olds can solve these kinds of problems, if they remember the conditions

    Example:

    -Trabasco teaches 4 year-olds to remember 5 premises: (i.e. Mickey is taller than Bryan. Bryan is taller than Justin.)

    àand then asked them ‘who’s tallest?’

    Note: -much harder for preschoolers than school-age kids b/c of the memory demands as well as the difficulty of coordination of info for multiple-premise pairs

    Distinguishing b/w appearance and reality

    -as mentioned, kids have hard time distinguishing b/w appearance and reality

    -some studies focus solely on child’s understanding of appearance-reality distinction

    Study:

    -a family cat was put on a dog mask. Kid asked: what animal is it?/what does it eat?/etc..

    3 year olds: frequently thought that the mask changed the identity of the animal

    5/6 year-olds: didn’t change the real identity of animal

    Study #2

    -Child shown object which appears diff:

    -i.e.

    sponge which looks like rock/

  • obj. colored by a filter

    results: 3 year olds are not able to see beyond appearance, regardless of culture and how their mother tongue phrases question

    àsince this study was done on both American/Chinese students

    Other studies show:

    -kid as young as 2½ sees a cockroach removed from orange juice. When asked, he said that the juice is still not drinkable

    -3 year-old uses the word

    real to distinguish b/w toys and real objs that they represents.

    Conclusion:

    -even though children are starting to distinguish b/w reality and appearance, in the beginning, their judgment is dominated by appearance. Only later in childhood does it b/c more reality based


    Preschooler’s attention and memory abilities

    Sensory register: the area of memory where incoming sensory info from the 5 senses are stored, very briefly.

    Short-term/working memory: the part of memory where consciously noted info is stored for 10-20 seconds

    Long-term-memory: the part of memory where memory is stored for a long time

    Attention skills: the processes that control transfer of info from

    sensory register to

    working memory.

    Memory skills: processes that retain info in

    working memory and/or transfer it to

    long-term memory.

    -Attention skills/memory skills have a central role in cognitive development, as seen in chapter 5

    Deploying attention

    -preschoolers have problem choosing what stimuli to focus on.

    Study -

    Vurpillot

    -shows children pictures of pair of houses. Some pairs are identical houses; some have diff. windows (see p. 322)

    preschoolers’ eyes were filmed to track movement àto see what they focus on

    made more mistakes than older kids b/c they did not use systematic tracking techniques, and therefore missed some of the important info, like some of the windows

    Other study by

    Vurpillot

    -kids scan more than they have to

    i.e.: 12 windows: 6 w/ objects/animals

    àkids asked to remember only the ones w/ animals

    àthey could have any amount of reopening the windows until they remembered all the ones w/ the animals (as opposed to the objects)

    conclusion: children didn’t organize their attentive behavior efficiently

    -preschoolers lack understanding of nature of attention

    àlack skills to maintain attention/shut off distraction

    -i.e. 2-4 year olds, watching ‘sesame street’ –won’t only watch it but do many other concurrent things

    -Preschoolers only begin to understand the nature of attention

    àonly by middle school to they deploy attention selectively.

    Preschooler’s memory

    young preschoolers, don’t see the need to remember things, but get devastated when they forget things

    by the end of preschool years, they are able to remember , but are not very good at generating a plan to facilitate remember.

    Abilities and limitations

    Recognition memory: the ability to perceive a particular stimulus as familiar

    Free recall: the ability to spontaneously pull info out of long-term memory

    Sometimes, preschooler’s recognition/recall skills are quite impressive

    I.e. 3 year old who remembers a wide array of construction vehicles

    àstudies show their ability to absorb a tremendous amount of info

    Autobiographical memory

    -During preschool

    àdirt memory of oneself is around 3½ /4

    -within lab setting, kids do better in recognition/memory games than on verbal games

    ài.e. ‘

    concentration’/ ‘

    memory’

    àB/c their visual/spatial skills are beteryam verbal memory skills

    -they still perform poorer than older children/adults when asked to recall things like pictures/#

    i.e. in a study of remembering digits of increasingly lengthy numbers (incr. # of digits)

    Preschoolers: 4 digit

    6-8 year olds: 5

    9-12 year-olds: 6

    College age: 8

    Possible explanations:

    Improvement of short-term memory b/c of the increasing speed of info.

    The kids are less familiar w/ numbers – harder for them to develop memory strategies

    Note: when asked something familiar to the, i.e. cartoon faces that they have seen the previous day, they remember as well as older children and even adults!

    But! When specifically asked to remember something, the older children/adults remembered better, since they have better remembering techniques

    àin previous case, it was merely passive memory. Now, it’s active memory

    Early memory techniques

    -preschool children actually do use some memory techniques

    asked to remember which container the toy was placed under

    put hand on container to remember

  • kept staring at right container to remember

    3 year-old asked to find a recently used camera

    look at where they have last seen it

    the look at other places they’ve seen it.

  • 3½ year-olds seek first where the camera was used

    Note: when kid looks for a lost object, it is exception rather than the rule; usually they are susceptible to adult suggestion

    àthat is why in courts, their witness is sometimes problematic as they might be saying something they think is true, but has really been suggested by the interrogator

    -b/f 5, kids don’t intentionally go over info to encourage retention

    -initially, preschooler’s memory techniques are:

    Context-bound

    Limited

    Inconsistent

    Encouraging improved performance

    -kid might know that memory-improvement skill is present but won’t know how to use it

    àparent’s help might help develop it.

    ài.e. reading out loud repeatedly will encourage the kid to review.

    ài.e. see

    vygotsky, above

    Social cognition

    -Improvements in memory skills and other aspects of thinking impacts kids social world

    Social cognition: a child’s understanding of the social world

    Preschooler learns:

    other’s thoughts and intentions

    what they’re likely ot do

    that people differ in their opinion to one’s opinion

    realization of all of this helps kid communicate, which in turn further helps child cognitive/social growth.

    Egocentrism in Preschoolers

    Piaget

    : preschoolers’ characterized by egocentrism

    -in reality, egocentrism is in all parts of development: it is merely more obvious in preschoolers.

    Example:

    -4 year-old put finger in her ears and asked her dad: can you hear me. When he said no, she raised her voice and asked again

    2 levels of egocentrism in this story:

    The kid though it was going to be hard

    for her dad to hear if she put her fingers in

    her ears

    Perceptual egocentrism

    By her dad saying no, that implied he must have heard her; but she didn’t consider his reality

    Cognitive egocentrism

    Piaget:

    -3mountain task

    -child shown picture of 3 mountains from atop. Then showed 3 pictures from sideways. The kid was supposed to tell which of those represents the former mountain he saw. (see bottom of p. 326)

    -->only by age 9/10, did the kids see right picture

    -->but this egocentrism is not complete: if kid is shown a block that’s red on one side and white on the other. When he sees the red, he does understand that on the other side

    study: kid sees cookies hidden in a crayon box. When the 2

    nd child enters, the 1

    st child is asked what the 2

    nd kid

    thinks is in the box. He answers ‘cookies’ as opposed to crayons

    -->can’r see the other one’s perspective.

    -->

    appearance-reality: what we saw

    must be reality

    study -

    flavell

    -kid can’t imagine other’s wishes

    -->3 year old who’s asked to select a gift for their parents will give a toy that the kid likes.

    -->sees reality through his eyes.(egocentrism)

    -->but nevertheless, there is a gradual progress: 3 and 4 year olds are aware of adults’ wishes -->they just have a hard time differentiating their wishes from adult’s wishes

    4 year olds more egocentric to teacher than to parent

    they knew better what parent buys to themselves than what teachers do

    5 year olds: 50% buy appropriate gifts for everyone on their list

    6 year olds buy appropriate gifts for everyone

    begin to see other person’s perspective

    begin to realize that their perspective/desires are not the other’s desires

    Flavall: factors needed to overcome egocentrism

    knowledge of existence

    knowing that other’s perspectives are diff. from theirs

    Awareness of need

    realizing that taking others’ perspective seriously, since it has social benefits

    social ben

    efit

    the ability to read other’s actions and imagine their perspective

    -in toddler period, baby is able to understand only basic facial expressions of mom

    -by 4, he is able to categorize it into good/bad

    -in early preschool, when this ability is emerging, it is still very basic, and is not always used

    -->even adults have trouble deducing facial

    The child’s theory of the mind

    -child is not only developing understanding of physical world, but also concepts of knowing/wanting/thinking/remembering/intending

    Theory of the mind: an understanding of the mind and mental operations

    àpart of the term includes ‘theory’ b/c it is not only the kid’s empirical observation of the physical world, but also theoretical constructs that help the kid construct the world around him

    John Flavall: stages of development of the theory of the mind

    1) the understanding that

    minds exist

    -during toddler period, kids can understand mental states, such as feelings/desires

    àwhich tells us that by that age, they can understand that the mind exists

    àthis stage is established b/f preschool years

    2)

    minds have connections to the physical world

    àwhat people feel/know/want is related to the world around them

    -occurs b/w age 2 and 3

    -

    i.e. by age 3 (by not age 2) the kid knows that is an object is hidden under a container, the person who looked knows that the object is there and the person who didn’t look doesn’t know that the object is there (unless told that object is there.

    -even though 3 /4 year olds know that there is a connection b/w mind and physical world, is very limited

    àthey still make mistakes like: predicting:

  • The kind of experience needed to know certain things

  • The knowledge needed to influence a certain behavior

    3)

    Minds are separate and different from the physical world

    -3 year olds know that the things that they fantasize about are not real

    àI.e. they know that if you are thinking about a cookie, it is not real, whereas the cookie that another kid has is.

    àdecrease in apprehension of imagined ghosts/monsters

    4)

    The knowledge that the mind can reflect objects/events accurately or inaccurately

    àRequires that kid has grasped mental representation ànot there by 2 or 3

    àby 4 or 5, there is clear understanding of it

    study:

    -kid hears a story of a kid who puts a candy in a blue cup. Then, while he was out, his mom moved to a green cup. Then the kid asked where the kid in the story would look for the candy.

    Result:

    -3 year old: said the kid looked for candy in green cup (where it

    really was)

    -4/5 year olds: said the kid looked for candy in the blue cup (where the kid

    thought it was)

    -->ability to consider another’s belief, even though it is false; yet also consider how it will affect his behavior.

    Note: -Belief-reality is similar to appearance-reality problem

    5)

    Minds actively interpret reality and emotional experience

    -->preschoolers think that mental representation is passively passed down

    -->kids as old as 8: everyone sees/hears the same will understand it the same way

    only in middle childhood does kid realize that person’s perception is based on prior experiences

    Communication and the decline of egocentrism

    -communication is beyond words: it is also presenting yourself correctly/clearly

    -->development of this starts in preschool period

    -->marks the decline of egocentrism

    Sudy –

    Glucksberg/Krauss

    -2 kids put at 2 ends of screen: can’t see each-other

    -had 6 blocks, each w/ a drawing on it (see top of page 329)

    -they had to put them in the same order, using verbal skills

    Results

    -4/5 year-olds = failure!

    -->descriptions were too egocentric and uninformative.

    I.e.:

    ‘a curved part of a pipe’ [ambiguous]

    ‘the first one’ [neither kid could see each other and the other person’s order]

    ignores the fact than neither can see each other, as seen in this dialogue:

    ‘It’s a bird’ – ‘is this it?’ –‘no’ -->while they could not see each other!!

    -the preschoolers

    have the ability to communicate ideas verbally, quite clearly. I.e. if you replace abstract figures of the above experiment w/ simple shapes/colors

    -->preschoolers describe situation better

    -->focus on more abstract objects = less ability to take other people into consideration

    Other studies

    -kids change their tone/language, depending on whom they speak to

    change their tone while speaking to younger kids (as seen in chapter 7)

    preschoolers spontaneously vary their classification depending on their listeners

    Example: adult spilt a cup of juice (stages accident). A week later, when asked why the cup was empty, the answer was diff. for those who where there or not.

    To find kid

    s maximum ability: take away/limit all other cognitive demands

    To find kid

    s typical ability: place kid in environment closest to his natural environment

    Limited cognitive resources and communication

    scripts

    -one way for preschooler to communicate, despite limited resources/communication skills, are

    scripts.

    Script: an abstract representation of the sequence of actions needed to accomplish some goal

    Examples of scripts:

    Going to fast-food restaurant

    Birthday party

    Shopping in a supermarket

    -scripts are learned by direct observation of adults

    sometimes, there is usage of

    specific behaviors/phrases, but usually, only the

    general behavior is learnt

    script learning is more complex than pure imitation of what one saw/heard

    -when speaking to adults, kids don’t so much use scripts: they rely more on the adult’s helping them be clear, and help ensure a smooth/clear dialogue.

    Overview of preschool cognitive development

    Cognitive advances during preschool years include:

    Emerging understanding of causation, especially in simple or familiar systems

    Ability to make clear distinction between living/non living things

    Qualitative understanding of many concepts related to quantity/ability to reason about small numbers

    Beginning of understanding of classification and other logical relationships

    Gradual development of the ability to distinguish b/w appearance and reality

    Expanding attention skills

    Steadily increasing understanding of others’ perspective and thoughts

    Chapter 10

    -b/w the ages of 2 ½ and 5, there is significant de. In the following categories

    Child

    ’s expanding world

    Kid can now initiate what games he wants to play w/ rich social interaction

    Self-reliance/self-control/self-regulation

    Spends less time w/ parent àmore w/ peers.

    Initiates own social activities

  • Less aggressive impulses than toddlers àless need to constantly supervise them

    Explore adult roles

    I.e. kids take turns playing the captain of a ship/cooking food/etc.


    Theme of the chapter: organization and coherence of preschooler’s behavior

    Some hallmarks of early childhood social and emotional development

    expanding world

    self-reliance

    self control/regulation

    The child’s expanding world

    -child spends increasing amount of time outside home

    ài.e. kindergarten/day-care.

    Important for things

    like:

    kid’s general adjustment

    competence w/ peers

  • complexity of play

  • all of them are influenced by the quality of play

    Other social influences:

    peers also infl. things like concept of fairness/reciprocity

    older siblings give framework for dev.

    can get involed w/ fantasy play, which he can’t do w/ mother

    see how to interact socially: i.e. when to interrupt mother w/ relevant issue

    Moving towards greater self-reliance

    -psychoanalysts emphasize preschooler’s sense of independent purposefulness

    Erikson called it

    initiative

    Initiative: Erikson’s term for child’s sense of independent purposefulness

    Bandura emphasized the child’s growing

    self-efficacy

    Self-efficacy: the sense of being able to do things effectively on one’s own

    àDr. Feldman: very similar!

    Sel

    f-reliance is supported by several capacities of 3-4 year old:

    motor skills such as climbing/manipulating obj.

    allows them to do more for themselves

    language/other cognitive skills

    helps them think/plan/solve problems in a way that they could not do as toddlers

    more abilities to tolerate delay/frustrations

    do a task despite obstacles/setbacks

    emerging capacity for imagination/fantasy play

    allows them to maintain a sense of power in a world controlled by adults


    -some children have trouble moving towards greater independence

    àneed constant adult encouragement to do simple challenge

    Instrumental dependency: a child’s normal need for adult help in solving complex problems or performing difficult tasks.

    Emotional Dependency: a child’s abnormal need for continual reassurances and attention from adults

    Self-control and self regulation

    -younger preschoolers can’t fully control themselves,

    -i.e. when playing a game, and the kids are told to only start running when I say go, and they run after we say: ‘ready, set...’

    àb/c they can’t fully inhibit their acts

    àthis ability comes in preschool period when the kids learn to monitor themselves

    Elinor Maccoby

    -lists things acquired by end of preschool period, as a result of the ability to monitor oneself/inhibit actions/delay gratification/tolerate frustration/adjust behavior to situation:

    weigh future consequences when deciding how to act

    stop thinking of possible ways around an obstacle blocking a goal

    control emotions when goal-directed activities are blocked, which decreases likelihood of tantrum

    concentrate: blocking out irrelevant thoughts/sights/sounds. Focus instead on what is needed to get to the desired objective.

    do more than one thing at a time as long as those things are not incompatible or highly complex

    threes skills are not fully developed, but they are well on their way

    Developing self

    -as seen in chapter 9, preschool period is marked by great cognitive advances.

    àchild b/c aware of themselves as a person:

    they have a mind

    that they are a particular person

    -beginning of realization of gender: that they are boys or girls and that one kind of parent is not another.

    Changes in self-understanding

    -late in toddlers period: mental self-concept is very primitive. Can only conceive of one concurrent thing:

    à‘

    I am eating an apple’

    -in preschool period, child can move b/w various alternate experiences

    -i.e. pretend to first talk to the baby teddy bead and then to the mom teddy bear, and have a skit that way

    àdue to this skill, preschooler can therefore also ‘observe’ themselves pretending

    ài.e. watching themselves in the mirror and say ‘that’s me’

    àdev. of self concept

    -but the self-concept is still very primitive.

    àthey have a hard time realizing that they are the same person both when they’re feeling good and when they’re feeling bad

    àthey can’t coordinate diff. aspects into a unified sense of self will wait until later childhood/adolescence

    Self-constancy and self-esteem

    -self-constancy: a sense that the self endures despite temporary disruptions in the relationships

    ài.e. when internalizing parents’ rules, challenging them (and feeling guilty) and then reaccepting them, and thus harmonizing w/ parents

    -

    i.e. a 3 year old kid will intentionally pull cord even when mom is there and he knows that she doesn’t want him to do it. àthe child expects that scolding response. He knows that he can remake the harmony relationship by apologizing

    àjust like the concept of

    reversibility in chapter 9

    -preschoolers start thinking of themselves as having dispositions which are consistent over time.

    àbut each preschooler’s view of the self is diff., depending on the his own development.

    Self-esteem: positive thoughts and feeling about the self

    àmost kids see themselves as likable/competent/efficient

    Gender and the Self

    -gender is a main organizing theme in development.

    àchild learns gender-appropriate roles/behaviors

    àcultural stereotypes regarding each gender

    àthis learning starts early and is pervasive

    Manifests itself in child

    s:

    activities

    preferences

    social styles

    -gender is so salient in preschoolers that they even begin to label objects/activities terms of gender

    àchildren remember better activities when they are ‘

    gender-appropriate’

    -gender is a key in preschooler’s emerging self concept:

    -being a girl or boy is a central definition of the self

    3 steps are involved in gender-based self-concept

    adaptation to

    sex-typed behavior

    actions that conform to cultural expectations about what is apprioriate for boys/girls

    simultaneously, acquire

    gender-role concepts

    Knowledge of cultural stereotypes regarding males/females

    lastly, child acquires emotional commitment to their particular gender, which is part of the process of identification w/ parents

    Changes in Sex-Typed Behavior

    -the development of sex-typed behavior occurs in steps.

    by age 2, children already have gender-related preferences in toys

    Boys: trucks/cars

  • Girls: soft/cuddly toys

  • This kind of learning probably comes from imitation and reinforcement


    by age 3-4 they know much more about gender-appropriate objects and activities

    categorical thinking of what is a male/female.


    -in US, even babies are differently

    dressed

    room decorated

    toys

    diff. relation

    àdifferential treatment increases in preschool period

    Judith Langlois

    àgives preschoolers gender-

    inappropriate toys to plays w/

    ànegative feedback

    Developing Gender-Role Concept

    -by age 4 or 5, children begin to learn more abstract cultural beliefs about gender diff.

    cognitive maturation

    continued/increased gender-role reinforcement

    dev. of more general/abstract ideas about gender roles

    Child increasing general gend

    er concept includes:

    Males:

    aggressive

    self-confident

    ambitious

    Females:

    emotional

    kind

    interpersonal sensitivity

    -more more extensive list, see bottom of p.345

    àthose gender-role concept start to form by 3, but are this extensive by age 5

    Child sees

    gender roles as:

    Men have a more

    instrumental role

    Women have a more

    expressive role

    -gender-concept encourages a strict gender segregation in classroom/playground

    àchildren prefer to play w/ kids of the same gender

    àthey know what gender category they’re in.

    Rare cases

    -children w/ ambiguous gender-organs who are brought up as the wrong gender

    àcan be reversed by 2½

    àafter the toddler period, the child has passed the critical point and will keep on thinking of himself as the gender he was originally brought up as

    Understanding gender-consistency

    Gender-consistency: the understanding that gender is permanent despite superficial changes

    -connected to appearance-reality problems, 3 year olds know that they are boys or girls, but do not know if they change behavior (i.e. boys wearing dresses), produce gender diff.

    -how early children show gender-constancy is diff. depending on how it is assessed

    i.e. study:

    -preschoolers asked to draw a boy/girl. Then the experimenter add a feature to make look like the other gender. Most preschoolers agree that the drawing is now the other gender

    Could possibly be b/c child assumed it was only a picture and one could change the picture at will

    Study #2

    Sandra Bem

    -3-5 year olds shown pictures of nude infants. Then showed same kids w/ sex-inappropriate clothing

    Results:

    almost ½ the boys/ over ½ girls knew that there is no diff. in the kid

    virtually said no, if asked if their gender would changed if they changed dress-style

    ¾ knew the diff. b/w male/female genitals

    Explaining sex-typed behavior and gender-role development

    -various explanations for sex-type behavior/gender-role concepts

    Social-learning theorists: reward-and-punishment experienced by children for appropriate and inappropriate behavior

    Cognitive theorists: children’s emerging understanding of categories/scripts/schemas

    Beginning of understanding of roles as gender category of either male or female

    Gender-schema theory: combines

    social learning and

    cognitive

    Children form cognitive schemas, but based on social experience

    psychoanalytical theory

    : emphasizes developmental change in relationship w/ parents. In striving to be like the parent of the same gender, they adopt same behaviors/attitudes

    note: this theory might have some cognitive elements to it, since the kid does need to recognize his gender and similarity to one parent over the other

    variation of psychoanalytical: (C

    hodorow) boys define their masculinity in terms of distance from mother, whereas girls define themselves by similarities to mother.

  • boys identify themselves in terms of separation/individual qualities

  • Girls: seek similarity in people

    Social Development: the new world of peers

    by age 2 –rudimentary signs of turn-taking

    they might say a word/show something to peer, wait for response and then repeat

    preschoolers’ social interaction s now b/c coordinated and sustained , due to linguistics skills

    can actually make up games/rules/fantasy games/novel procedures/etc.

    Competence w/ peers

    -social competence complex measure

    -can’t measure purely how much contact kid as w/ others

    could be aggressive contact

    could be asymmetrical (i.e. always the followers)

    large # of contacts doesn’t imply competence

    sometimes, playing alone also doesn’t imply a social problem

    that is diff. from hovering near kdis and not being able to join

    -you need to combine measures, i.e.

    engage/reaction to peers w/ positive feelings

    are of interest/highly regarded by peers

    can sustain a give-and-take interaction

    able to leas as well as to follow

    will be judges by teacher/observer as socially competent

    usually, social measures are in agreement w/ each other

  • they foster each-other. I.e.


    Early Friendships

    -not only do preschoolers prefer certain friends to play w/ over others, but this relationship could last over a year!!! (as seen in observational studies)

    Factors:

    Parents promote/encourage it

    Seeing the kid every day in preschool

    àby age 4, kids have ability to maintain friendships by themselves

    -preschooler show different behaviors / friends than w/ non-friends

    cooperate in problem-solving tasks

    more positive exchanges

    -when put in an experimental conflict situation (i.e. new game, each one told diff. rules):

    more conflict b/w friends

    but less heated

  • end in fairer results

    doesn’t cause the kids to separate

  • they have a clear motivation to remain friends

    àbeginning of learning to be together despite conflict

    -sharing might be the beginning of sense of justice

    Importance of peer relationships

    Social relationships teaches kids:

    fairness

    reciprocity

    cooperation

    manage interpersonal aggression

    cultural norms (i.e. gender-roles)

    helps kid establish self-concept

    -peer interaction is the best predictor of later success, b/c it measures things like:

    level of adjustments

    psychological problems

    school achievements

    Potential ways to help socially isolated kid:

    Increased social interaction also helps kids overcome developmental problems

    ài.e. socially drawn kids who get to interact w/ younger kid, on a 1-to-1 basis, he will b/c more socially involved

    àgives child the change to b/c it enhances social skills/confidence in peer relations

    Hook kid up w/ kid of same peer group who is patient but socially competent

    Have teacher teach kids social skills

    Emotional Development

    -since all areas of development are inter-related, emotional development would also be as significant as social/cognitive development of the preschoolers

    Young children’s understanding of Emotion

    -by preschool age, kids know a lot about emotion/emotional expression

    by age 6, expansion of words/emotional concepts to include concepts like:

    sad/jealous/proud/embarrassed/miserable

    -preschoolers are able to interpret positive feeling that others express almost as well as adults

    àbut not negative emotions expressed

    -preschoolers have a difficulty distinguishing b/w what people

    really feel and what they

    appear to feel

    àthey can distinguish b/w happy/sad face pictures

    àbut they can’t understand that one who is happy may not appear to be happy, and one who is sad could put on a sad face

    à

    Appearance-reality problem

    -in preschool period, kid starts to understand causes of emotion:

    àby age 4, kids understand that causes are not only what really happened, but also what people

    expect/think happened

    à

    example: if a kid mistakenly thinks he’s not going to get the prize

    -only by age 5-8 do kids start to combine situational cues and visible emotional expression to infer someone’s feelings

    Growth of Emotional Regulation

    Emotional regulation: the capacities to control and direct emotional expression/maintain organized behavior in the presence of strong emotions/be guided by emotional experiences

    Tolerating Frustration

    -important skill: not to get out of control out of frustration.

    -this skill begins at age 2 and develops drastically during childhood

    more constructive responses, i.e. seeking help

    less angry/tantrum prone

    stay engages in problem despite frustration

    use of negotiation to solve conflict

    -this change affects relationship w/ parents

    àmuch decrease defiance b/w age 2-5

    Delay of gratification: the ability to forgo an immediate reward in favor of a better reward at a later time

    àa form of toleration of frustration

    in preschoolers, they can do it w/ adult help

    By middle childhood, child can delay gratification by themselves

    -->researchers are not sure why this dev. happens in this stage of life

    Possibly, that us when kids learn:

    To repress feelings

    Strategies to limit the tension-build up that occurs during frustration

    I.e.: study: kids see a toy that is locked up in a glass box: their frustration is diverted when they distract themselves by doing something else

    Showing flexibility in emotional expression

    -preschooler’s ability to self-control emotions varies b/w kids

    Ego resiliency: the ability to modify self-restraint to adapt to changing conditions

    -i.e. in the kindergarten: in one situation, the kid stands quietly in line. In another situation, he runs wildly in the playground

    -->i.e. self-reserved vs. spontaneous/expressive in some situations

    Internalizing Standards

    Internalization: incorporation of standards of behavior into the self.

    -->socialization

    -->after internalization, kid will follow parents’ prohibition even when they are not there

    -

    internalization: the bridge b/w being controlled by others and self-regulation.

    -->also affects moral development

    Robert Emde:

    stages of development of moral self

    3-year-olds know that some actions are right and others are

    4-year-olds see

    moral transgressions (i.e. not sharing/hitting) as worse than

    conventional transgressions (i.e. eating w/ fingers)

    -->they make such judgments more independent of adults than younger kids

    -->knew have not only internalized a certain behavior, but a sense of moral obligations

    Progression of socialization:

    Direct (‘don’t hit’)

    Implicit external controls (‘You’re a good boy for letting Bob play w/ your boat’)

    Encourage self-regulation (‘I am counting on you to divide the cookies fairly’)

    -encouraging self-regulation requires reasoning/persuasion

    -if parents show consistently fair behavior/explicit information about rules, then kids will more likely to behave responsibly in their absence

    Self-Evaluative Emotions

    -internalization (socialization) affects preschoolers’ emotional experiences

    -->genuine pride/guilt

    -->diff. from toddlers’ shame/pride

    Diff. b/w Toddler and Preschoolers

    emotions

    preschoolers feel it b/c they know that they did something wrong -->not b/c their parents are angry

    preschoolers: not b/c they fear punishment, but rather b/c of undermining of self-esteem b/c of not living up to

    internal standards

    i.e. happier when solving complex than simple tasks -->compare the task to internal standards!

    Preschoolers: not global feeing, but rather associated w/ a certain action

    I.e. happy if they find the solution themselves

    Emotional Development/Aggression/Pro-social Behavior

    Aggression: Forceful, negative acts directed against others or their possessions

    Prosocial Behavior: Positive feelings and acts directed towards others w/ the intention of benefiting them.

    -->both connected to emotional regulation

    -->we expect to see both in child’s development

    -in prosocial behavior, you must know to set your desires aside and take other’s desires into consideration

    Development changes in Aggression

    -true aggression: intent to cause physiological/physical harm

    àneeds the cognitive ability to know the consequence of actions

    -in toddler period: anger at constraints by parents àas well as negative behaviors towards peers.

    àthis kind of behavior peaks in toddler period and declines into middle preschool

    -in the early preschooler period, this attitude is object-centered (to get the toys from the peer)

    -in preschool period: development of fairness: decrease in aggression

    àacts of aggression àincreasingly only to cause the others

    -by this age àconsistency of level of aggression

    -as development occurs in preschool period: alternatives to aggression

    àdecrease in

    instrumental aggression

    à but not in

    Hostile aggression

    Instrumental aggression: Aggressive as a means to get something

    Hostile aggression: aggression aimed solely at hurting someone else

    àwhen the child perceives that their right has been violated/egos threatened

    -by middle change, hostile aggression changes dramatically to more verbal aggression.

    Development of Empathy and Altruism

    Empathy: the ability to experience the emotions of other people.

    Altruism: the unselfish act aimed to help someone else

    àboth empathy/altruism develop parallel to aggression

    àsame cognitive processes underlie it:

    the kid must understand that he is an independent agent of his own action

  • they can cause feelings in others that are diff. from theirs

    Researchers: 3 stages of development of empathy

    Primitive capacity for empathy

    : Infancy: crying when other is distressed

    8-month-old will go to seek contact w/ mom àno actual knowledge of who’s really upset

  • there is no clear distinction b/w self and other at this stage

    More purposeful helping behaviors

  • child might hug crying baby/bring favorite toy/mom to baby

    in reality, it is not the what is helpful to the situation: they bring their

    own favorite toy/mom to the scene

    the capacity to take the perspective of the others and to respond to others

    ’ need

    early childhood/preschoolers

    actual acts of helping are rare, though they have the capacity to feel for the other


    Study:

    Radke-Yarrow:
    -telling kid not to hurt someone –not enough

    -child needs a nurturing caregiver -->who gives empathic support to others

    -->parents need to

    show a model of empathy

    -parents must likewise also explain kids

    The emotional consequences for the victim

    Expectations of kindness

    Convey entire message w/ intensity of emotions about the issue

    Bowlby: infant’s security of attachment of child predicts empathy/pro-social in preschoolers

    -->kids who experience nurturing childrearing also learn how to be nurturing

    -despite diff. of expression, both genders show increase in helpful/pro-social behavior throughout preschool

    The Role of Play in Preschool Development

    -lack of play –sign of extreme abnormality

    -->child will automatically play when needs met -->child has an intrinsic motive to play

    -->this is beyond the influence of external reinforcement

    -play helps kids explore environment/create new experiences

    -->children b/c active participants in their own development

    Play help w/:

    kids learn new skills/practice behaviors/concepts at the edge of their capacities

    trying out roles alone and w/ other kids

    expanding/preserving sense of self

    play is also an arena for emotional expression

    play is often concerned w/ important themes/feelings from everyday life

    Play and mastery of Conflict:

    -play is preschoolers foremost way to deal w/ conflict/mastering frightening or painful

    -i.e. playing lost/dealing w/ ‘monsters’

    -->

    example: in one case, kid who was barked at by dog -->next day, she played w/ her dolls, where in the game, a dog barks at the dolls and she said ‘it’s OK, it won’t hurt you!’

    -play is also a way to deal w/ the kid’s developmental issues.

    -->i.e. the issue of power, where in real life, the kid can’t tell others what to do, but is rather told what to do.

    -->in play, he can control others. (i.e. tell kids what to do)

    -pretend play is a healthy outlet for children

    -->they actively confront problems

    -->gives prototype for future confrontations

    -history of parental support/nurturance can help those children fins those healthy resolutions to issues/conflicts

    -->kids w/ such parents tend to engage in fantasy play that is more flexible and elaborate/more likely to bring negative themes to positive resolution

    -

    exmaple: if the issue played out is control, the game might be of a kid who broke his leg and the ambulance comes to fix

    Role playing

    -playing gives the opportunity for role-playing/cultural values

    àplay out aspirations/fears

    àdressing up like adults and behaving like themàidentifying w/ parent/gender role

    -cultural factors influence the quantity./form/themes of children’s social fantasy

    i.e. Orientals: more harmonizing fantasy play

    N.A. kids àmore conflict based fantasy play

    -more fantasy play that is flexible/elaborate: is seen judged better by teachers

    àfantasy play shows the overall adjustment quality of kid

    The Parental Role in Early Childhood Development

    -social/emotional development is influenced by past history/current preschool development

    Important aspect of parenting in the preschool period

    Erkison: preschoolers might strive to master too much for their abilities

    àif parents ridicule/punish kid for his failures àkid might develop pervasive negative feelings

    -parents must neither push kids too far or thwart their efforts

    -Parents must also show consistency and values in their own acts that they want to pass on to their kids

    àsame as in toddlers, just w/ more mature kids

    Characteristics of parenting:

    Authoritative parenting: A parenting style in which parents are nurturing/responsive/supportive, yet set firm limits for their kids

    Permissive parenting: A parenting style in which parents fail to set firm limits or to require appropriately mature behavior of their children

    Authoritarian Parenting: A parenting style in which parents are unresponsive/inflexible/harsh in controlling behavior

    àassociated w/ frustration/apprehension/passive hostility

    àmight be b/c of physical punishment or other parenting tools used

    [àchart of task of parents’ vs. kids]

    -diff styles of parenting are appropriates in diff. contexts

    -authoritarian parenting: more predominant in inner-city/dangerous neighborhood

    -consequences are not clear, but some studies show it has positive effects:

    àpossibly b/c those kids see it as care/support and not rejection

    -Less successful styles of parenting can be associated w/ negative situations in the parents’ lives: high level stress/marital conflict

    àkids are very vulnerable to parents’ conflict

    àleads to higher levels of behavioral problems/negative play w/ peers/anxiety about parents’ whereabouts

    àthe particular effects on children may depend on the form of marital conflict experienced

    Mutually hostile parental interaction associated w/ aggressive behavioral patterns

    Father is angry/withdrawn = associated w/ anxiety

    -Divorce may also have a negative effect on preschool kids: they are able to grasp the anger/incompatibility b/w parents

    àbut they are not mature enough to grasp that it is not their fault

    à3½ -6 àself blame is rampant.

    Identification w/ Parents:

    Identification: The process by which children strive to be like their parents in thoughts/feelings/actions

    ànow, not only does the kid influenced by parents’ actions to them, but also how they are in general

    àbased on kid’s relationship w/

    both parents

    Process

    :

    -i.e. kid sees his new-found abilities àthinks he’s all-powerful

    àbut in contrast, he comes into conflict w/ parents’ restraints

    àhas to recognize that they are more powerful than he is

    àso as a resolution, the kid

    identifies w/ parent

    -this process starts at around 3-3½

    àkid shows more cooperation w/ parents

    -kid needs to

    understand parents’ attitudes ànot just observe them

    àcomes only after the cognitive advances of the preschool period

    comes hand in hand w/:

    Development of inter-person aggression

  • Empathy

    Self-regulation

    -cognitive readiness for the kid to accept rules is not the whole reason for him to accept them:

    parent’s love –motivational/emotional reason

    Relationship that encourages communication

    I.e. if parents overemphasize their power in teaching rules: the kid will b/c too anxious and not internalize it

    But if parents are clear in giving rules, kid will only b/c slightly anxious and indeed internalize the rules

    -coercive parenting will lead the kid to do the thing, but positive parenting, such as

    committed compliance will get the kid to internalize the issue

    -Quality of parent-child relationship may affect the internalization of rules.

    àsecurity of attachment is related to child’s openness to socialization/identification w/ family norms/values

    -

    Waters: positive orientation to family rules/norms is part of child’s secure attachment

    The Coherence of Behavior and Development

    Coherence of the self

    -there is a logical coherence in the characteristics of preschoolers

    àclusters of characteristics go together

    -the kids don’t show random characteristics by preschool age, but rather an emergence of distinct personalities

    Some of qualities that the infant/toddlers need is also needed in preschoolers:

    Parental warmth/emotional responsiveness/sharing of positive feelings

    Children of parents who are emotionally responsive tend to show empathy for others and engage in pro-social behavior

    Parents who accept child’s autonomy/emotionally responsive/share positive feelings: child b/c competent w/ peers and cooperative w/ parents

  • Those correlations don’t show cause-and-effect, but they do show parental warmth/responsiveness’ importance

    -some parental qualities b/c important in preschool:

    consistency of parenting

    agreement b/w parents

    -child’s needs/abilities are changing àso does parental styles

    àneeds to give kid certain autonomy, yet be able to step in, in the right times

    i.e.

    higher self-esteem usually goes w/ flexible self-control and pro-social behavior/positive feelings

    more hostility usually come w/ no pro-social behavior

    kids dependant on their preschool-teachers are generally also not so pro-social

    -parents have some influences in kid’s personalities, by having consistent/logical parental patterns:

    àsuch as encouraging independent as well as being supportive of peer-group and helping initialing social events for their kids

    Coherence of behavior over time

    -there is logic in child’s preschool behavior as well as development over time

    ài.e. secure attachment in infancy usually also lead to secure attachment in preschool years

    -in later stages, attachment must be measured diff. than in infancy, since the ‘

    strange situation’ of brief separation won’t invoke attachment issues in preschoolers

    -

    Everett

    Waters and

    Brian

    Vaughn made a home observational procedure to measure the use of parent as a base of security in preschoolers called

    Attachment Q-sort.

    Secure attachment patterns

    -preschoolers w/ secure attachment might vary in characteristics like social involvement or activity levels, but they share certain positive patterns of behavior:

    high self-esteem

    empathic w/ friends

    self reliant

    more positive emotions

    more curiosity

    popular w/ peers

    more capacity for forming friendships than anxiously attached preschoolers

    little hostile aggression/negative emotion

    though they might be assertive/use

    instrumental aggression

    they don’t actively seek to injure in response to provocation or frustration

    Anxious-resistant attachment:

    low self-esteem

    unable to sustain the give-and-take of friendship

    usually neglected by peers

    not flexible self-management

    great need for support/contact w/ teachers –often hovering near them

    such kids are frequent targets of bullying by other kids

    Anxious-avoidant

    emotionally isolated

    hostile/aggressive towards other kids, which is calculated and done even w/o provocation

    i.e. when one kid said that they have a stomach ache, this kid puncher her in the stomach. When she said it hurt, he did it again.

    Lying/blaming others/behaving defiantly

    During group activity/when its time to go home, the child seeks in a desperate manner to get teacher’s contact

    But when upset, or the teacher greets kid, he is rejecting

    In

    ternal logic stems from general mistrust; unresolved need for nurturance arising from doubts about availability of care in early childhood

    Explaining Developmental Coherence

    -some reasons for coherency of development and behavior over time:

    Parenthood style remains the same

    The kid is b/c an increasingly consistent force in its own development

    I.e. some kids expect others to be responsive to them. Others don’t

  • Affects how he sees/appraises his social reality

    Example

    -parents and others might show less positive emotions to a difficult child, which prompts a less positive reaction which in turn maintains the original difficultness.

    àcould happen in a similar way in a school/kindergarten/social/peer setting

    -i.e. children reject an aggressive peer, which in turn encourages him to keep on being aggressive

    Stability and change in Individual behavior

    -personality is rooted in child’s history, i.e. responsiveness of care in infancy/toddler

    àleads to the quality of attachment

    Erikson:

    Basic Trust: -the level of secure attachment relates to a sense of self-worth/connection to others

    -in secure attachment, parents built on this and are:

    supporting child’s independent initiatives

    promoting self-control

    maintaining a clear parental support by giving emotional support/expecting appropriate behavior

    Note: quality of control predicts diff. behaviors than quality if attachment.

    Example of behaviors based on control

    attention and activity problems in elementary school are related to parents’ failure to maintain boundary b/w them and child and support child’s dev. of self control/management

    àcombination of quality of parental control and attachment is better predictor of behavior then either

    -early child experiences/temperament do not directly infl. child’s behavior in preschool period.

    ài.e. quality care could have positive consequences, even to anxiously attached kid

    -as in earlier stages of development, stress/family support are critical factors in quality of care

    -it’s been shown that cross-culturally, measures of parental stress/social support affects the:

  • degree of security of child

  • quality of parent-child relationship

  • child’s acceptance by peers

    -as mentioned earlier, to move from anxious to confident relationship could occur if single mother finds a stable, long-lasting relationship

    -though personality change is possible, it is harder as child’s personality stabilizes

    In infancy, caregiver behavior/environment are better predictors of later behavior, rather than current behavior

    But assessment of preschoolers is a good predictor of behavior even up to adolescence and early childhood

    Developmental history is now a factor

  • Personality is stabilizing

  • Patterns that emerge, like aggression, b/c hard to change



    Class

    -it is natural to have a best friend/friends

    àneed to have some hierarchical social structure

    -development of abstract concepts: God/death

    à family tree: Grandma = mom’s mom
    Locations of visitors to this page