-a positive or negative change
during life.
-Hall developed ‘dev. Psyc’
Developmental psychology starts at birth and ends at death.
Opinions as to the exact beginning:
1)conception
2)birth
3)before conception- i.e. family
background, parents relationship, etc.
Nature vs. Nurture
Various areas of development:
Thoughts/intellectual
Development of linguistics
Movement from more egocentric to less egocentric
3) Motorical development
4) Emotional/social development
à
each act is a combination of the areas above developments
i.e. soccer
player: cognitive: to know the rules and the current situation
in the game; emotional: to deal w/ failure; motoric/physical:
ability to run
Outlook
Universal models
Look at changes that occur to everyone at the same age without any relation to their respective culture
-establish norms
Norm: what most people do/undergo
Advantage: -ability to find problem
-ability to isolate positive and negative characteristics
Disadvantage: -might assume a negative trait in a person when not applicable
-i.e. why is one kid more scared of strangers than another
-the study of the influence
on person by surroundings
Developmental Psychology’s goals
1) To collect basic information on the development of a person (descriptive)
2) practical purposes
i.e. –to know when bedwetting is expected to stop.
-court: where is a kid best off? At mom’s care/dad’s care/foster home
1)collect data from the group
2)analyze info: i.e.: if most kids start speaking at the same time, it is probably genetic
3)foresee: what will happen in future cases
4)influence: using tools to fix a problem
à
no clear answer
Opinions:
Nature
-Behaviors is only influenced by genes/biology
-John Lock-baby=clean slate – life chisels at it
-Behavior infl. By nurture: nutrition/right upbringing
-Rousseau – baby=intrinsically good, but corrupted by society
--
There are things influenced
more by nature and some more by nurture
Way to check:
-identical twins separated at birth and brought up in different surroundings
-2 people of different genes
grow up in same surrounding
Anthropology: children grown in same surroundings vs. others
-i.e. in idnie tribes of Africa, child is carried on backs of mothers for hours a day – muscles are restrained
-1---0---1
-1 –opposite relationship b/w the compared individuals (i.e. one smart, one not)
0 –no comparable relationship b/w compared ind. (therefore, not genetic)
1 –equal relationship b/w/
compared ind. (i.e. both smart)
Example:
1)identical twins grew up in 1)different 2)same surrounding
2) 2 people w/o family relation
who grew up 1)together 2)separately
Identical twins
grew up together |
Identical twins
grew up separately |
w/o family relation
grew up together |
w/o family relation
grew up separately | |
Heredity
Research |
1
0.8 |
1
0.77 |
0
0.23 |
0
0.01 |
Environmental (‘nurture’) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
àproof that genetics do not have exclusive influence
1)maturity
2)growth
3)learned
Maturity
-cellular maturity that allow for new action
ài.e. cells mature at certain age to
allow for walking
-everyone had a biological clock that control maturity of cells
-i.e. first baby crawls, then walks.
# of cells in an organ increases
-unlike maturity, which refers
to size/ability of cells
-influence by both genes/environment
à could also be infl. By emotional environment
-Growth not necessity for maturity
-Maturity not necessity for growth
-Change in behavior infl. By language
-i.e. leaning a language
-maturity –necessity for for learn
-there are rare cases where leaning infl. Maturity
1)Observation
2)closed/open questionnaire
Closed: given a range of answers that the person has to choose
Open:
asking a free-range question
3)physiological
-observe things that reflect the kid feels/thing
-brain scans
Focus of Dev. Psyc.
1)Developmental trends
2)Individual difference
3)psychopathy
Developmental trends
Observe how the child is developing mentally/physically
-adolescence – end of mental development
What do kids have in difference?
How Come
What outcome will it have?
What can be derived?
How could it be fixed if necessary?
Focus here is on individual (‘developmental trends’ focus on group – they do not oppose each other – just different focus.)
The study of unhealthy /not-normal development
-necessity of defining normal,
in order to compare normal to not-normal
-In our class, since the focus is on development of kids, psychopathy is only referring to either kids developing wrongly or parents upbringing kids in bad ways
Babies were thought to be confused and helpless
-Watson:
babies have no response/reflex/feeling
studies show:
In Reality:
-Babies can follow sounds/objects first day after birth
-Recognize mom’s voiced immediately
-sound very developed
-vision underdeveloped àcan only recognize colors after 2 months
--
During first few months, baby strives to attain:
1)social contact
2)food
3)avoiding harmful stimulants
1)Suck
2)Look
3)Focus on an object
suck
Babies suck faster at things that they like better
Babies look at new objects,
then turn away once it is familiar to them
Habituates – regular (and uninteresting)
Dishabituates – the regular object no longer is regular
-did research on child development
2 of his famous tests
1) Had 2 identical cups with identical amount of liquid. Each with a different color.
The sample kid was asked which was fuller – he answered that it was equal. Then 1 cup’s liquid was moved into a tall glass When asked which had more liquid:
6 year old: the taller
7 year old: not sure
8 year old: same
2)train goes by – one area of tracks are blocked by a screen. When screen is lifted, there is a box on the tracks
-baby looks in confusion
àwe use baby’s vision to see h.m. he knows
-conc. From case #2: babies
at one point realize that logically, things do not cease existing
when they disappear
babies realize that things do not cease existing when they are out of sight at age 18-19 months |
Terminology | |
Qualitative change |
a transformation/ improvement based on the sum of experiences (as opposed to physical/cognitive improvement) |
Quantitative change | Change in numbers |
Behavioral reorganization | A new way which a developing person organizes his skills/abilities |
Orderly | Logical flow of development which builds on the previous stage, and paves the way for the new stage |
Cumulative | Each stage includes all previous stages, including itself (the new stage) |
Directional | The direction of the development should always be towards a more complicated stage |
Development |
The process of Quantitative, Qualitative change and Behavioral reorganization that are orderly, cumulative and directional |
Types of Development | |
Normative development |
-A development
found in most kids. Therefore, this specific development is defined
as normal.
-numbers used in statistics of normative development is usually only an average |
Individual development |
-A development
found in individual kids, but not in most kids
àthis leads to personal differences, and expertise that a specific kid has in a given task à |
2 kinds of individual differences | |
1)most common form of Individual Development is the variations in when the specific kid reached a developmental stage | |
2)Personal experiences which influence a kid’s development, and therefore contribute to his expertise in a task or his personality |
Example |
If a accounting
firm has an increase in clientele, they could increase # of accountants
(quantitative change)
àthey could acquire new technology (quantitative change) àonce they do that, they could also reorganize the firm to make each accountant specialize in a different transaction, thus causing a Behavioral reorganization |
Case study | |
Parent holds a napkin in mouth
and waves head (w/ napkin in mouth) in front of:
6 months old baby Concentrates on napkin or parent’s face àtakes napkin out of mouth and observes
it (through his senses, i.e. touch/tongue) 10 months old baby Can concentrate on both, therefore understanding the illogical scene, thus, the baby starts to smile/laugh. àis able to follow the parent’s movements àtakes napkin out of mouth of parent
and replaces it | |
Analysis of case study | |
-Both babies have same physical/anatomic
abilities
The difference is Qualitative | |
Qualitative change | -a transformation
based on the sum of experiences
6 mo. Baby -not able to concentrate on both mom and napkin -only at one at a time à
therefore not seeing that the mom is trying to play -can concentrate on both mom and napkin àbecause baby remembers that the mom usually does not have napkin in mouth àthis
baby knows that she can take napkin away from mom and replace it, thus
returning to the original scene àthe fundamental qualitative change took place in the memory of the baby |
Behavioral reorganization | A new way which
a developing person organizes his skills/abilities -the older baby is now able not only to remember, but to coordinate b/w 1)her past memories, 2)as past experiences and future expectations |
Summery:
3 factors play role in psychological development:
1) Genes
2) Past development
3) Present environment
Evolution/Natural Selection
Darwin – 1809-1882
-Natural selection: when a certain variance in genes put a specific animal in an advantage in terms of survival. He will have more chances of surviving and spreading it’s genes than the animals w/o this advantage àeventually this specific gene will spread to a big group of the species and might overtake it àEvolution
The 3 factors also necessary in evolution
Summery:
3 factors play role in evolution:
1) Genes
2) Past development
3)
Present environment
Genes in psychology:
Psychologists are interested to discover which behaviors genes cause, and under which environmental conditions those genes are turned on by.
àthe psycho. want to study it to know which environments to avoid or encourage in the specific kids.
Symbol-something that is meant
to rep. something else
Experiment #1
-a model of a room is shown to a kid. A small doll is hidden in the model room in front of the kid. Then kid told that the experimenter is doing the same to the real-life room (to which the model-room is based after.) ànot in front of the kid, the experimenter hides other doll in the place corresponding to the place in the model-room where the doll was hidden.
-2½ kid can’t clearly correspond the model room w/ the real room àtrial and error until she finds doll
-3 year old kid finds it immediately, thus having the ability to correspond b/w model and actual room
Floor of crib, -one half has a pattern; the other half is see-through to below where a similar pattern is laid.
-6 months old will claw across crib, not having depth perception
-8 months old won’t craw over the see-through
Some of kids: outgoing/others secluding
àthis is a fundamental diff. among humans
àeven though it is very much genetic,
this behavior could be modified
-another factor – outgoing
mom = outgoing kids
Psychopathic/verbal skills also genetic
->Environment determines
w/ genes will activate
à2-3
yr-old only can see his own view àcan’t be empathical
Class, Nov 6, 2000
3 structures of which baby b/c adult | |
Quantitative | More # of same:
àmore steps/more memory |
Qualitative | Yesterday: leg movement àtoday: steps |
Reorganization | W/ walking comes fear àreorganization? |
-Different theories allot different
amounts of each structure in each stage of development
-Dev. Psych needs theory in order to experiment àneeds to experiment a theory
àevery
theory focuses on a different element of behavior
2 things could be focused on in research:
1) Observable behavior (cognitive/intellectual)
2) Internal experience (social/emotional)
Cognitive theories | |
Information-processing | Mental development |
-The
attempt to compare kid’s thought process to computer
àhow
process/remember data Attention selectorPerceptionàshort term memory.àl/t mem -this theory focuses mostly on quantity/cognitive development àmore and more ability ->culture irrelevant to development |
Piaget-normative cognitive development -how do kids perceive their
surrounding? ->at certain point, minds are better changes occur in age: 2/7/11-12 à
qualitative theory -this theory is based on perception - not ability |
Ways to get info: experiment/observation |
Experiment
|
Social/Emotional theories |
Social learning (Behaviorism) |
Based
on behavioral models
àObserved
behaviors -Assumption: behavior could be engineered through upbringing àdid
not agree w/ genes affecting behavior -The Americans had fear of theories of genetics (i.e. Nazi) |
Psychoanalysis |
FreudPsychoanalytical theory-this theory focused on unconscious
problems which cause psychopathism 3 layers of the unconsciousness Id –the unconscious layer which seeks to fulfill instinctive acts/pleasureàPleasure –libido (i.e. sexual)Ego (also called I)–the layer which seeks to fulfill the instinctive acts in legitimate way -->restrains the id àour way to process reality -cognitive Superego – the layer which has the value system –consciousness -affected
by upbringing/parents/culture -the defense-system is b/w the Id/Ego -When conflict b/w id/superego
is too hard, a symptom occurs, ài.e. hysteria/depression Individual personality development-Stages of developed in a specific order/stages àstages revolve around satisfying instinctive drives of some parts of the body àeach
stage occurs at roughly same age in everyone Personality:
h.m/to what degree each Drive is satisfied or repressed Psychosexual theory-stages in sexual development -Oral –based on breastfeeding -Anal- toilet training -Phallic –connection to relationships/sexuality -Oedipal –end of Phallic stage: connection to mom/rejection of dad -Genital –focus
on genitals Genital stage –lasts
for the rest of life. Fixation: when kid not able to fix problems of that stage àSymbolically,
the kid will relive stage throughout life. Examples of fixation
on specific stages: -Oral –lack of independency -Anal- control on people -Phallic –exhibitionism – I am the most beautiful/worries about perceptions of others -Oedipal
–hating dad – loving mom Freud: Healthy life: -fixed sexual life (heterosexual/ -fixed income w/ healthy job
(i.e. socially acceptable) -initially, Freud spoke of intrinsic drives influencing personal dev. àLater, spoke of more individual conditions affecting development |
Psycho-social |
Erikson-Also lists qualitative different stages which person has to go through, during lifetime àUnlike Freud, Erikson said that a person can’t be fixed on one stage àeach person solves stage –some better/some
worse -Erikson’s stages –more
inclusive than Freud Stage Details Age Basic Trust vs. Basic mistrust 1 yr Autonomy vs. shame/doubt 2 yrs Initiation vs. guilt i.e. what you do in playground 4 yrs Industry vs. interiority i.e. learning techniques 6-11 yrs Identity vs. confusion of roles -adolescence 11-16 yrs Intimacy vs. isolation Young adults Fertility vs. ‘congealation’ -can you make family/job Adults/generic Ego-completion vs. despair Are you happy or sad w/ life’s achievements Old |
Freud’s notions |
Mental Apparatus-Freud Believed that Everything
in psychology is bound to be discovered by logic\scientific research Science=morality-the more science we know, the better the world will be. -i.e. the better/more crops we know to grow, the less hunger there will be. à we do not believe that after WWII |
-Developments happened in stages
-Developments happened in linear way
-Reinforced childhood experience is a huge factor in behavior
Find out:
*why did people pick specifically those friends/partners
*why do they act the way they
do?
àmake those things conscious and perhaps make a dissonance
àmight help change
Kids need attention during infancy
àif
kid taken from parents b/f 4 àvery traumatic
-kids who grow up in establishments –negative effect
àlack of stimulus/care during infancy
-Culture has effect on psychological
development
Example:
-in Japanese culture:
-kids seen as intrinsically independency àneeds to be made ASAP
-self control
-respect
-mom: never leaves àeven for shopping
-dad leaves parenthood for mom
àway different from North American culture
Community/family/social group/socioeconomic
level
Context –our surroundings
Question h.m. does our context influence our development?
Answer:
Freud/Wilmford: baby needs human surrounding (context) in order to have a normative development
Problem: orphanage: baby does not have a long-range relationship ài.e. change of workers; not enough personal care.
àbaby feels that what he indicates is meaningless (i.e. signs of tiredness might be ignored b/c ‘it is time to be fed’)
àmight lead to signs of autism
Context: within a relationship during development, which helps infant develop
àinfant needs a constant relationship, i.e. mom
àcontext could also be a cultural context
Americans –more eye contact that Japanese
àJapan has more structured society than America
-parents work more/spent more
time @ home
Question: how does that effect the kid’s context?
àParent’s
choices are depended on culture
Ecological context
-Bronfenbrener
BronfenbrenerMade a pie to show person’s
development factors: Biological genes -Genetic predispositions of the infant – help the infant survive -i.e. knows how to =suck/seeks
relationship w/ adults/turns head if airway is blocked/tendency to be
sociable *whatever one wants to teach
a baby, it has to relate to its inherent survival skills àsome babies more active; some are more shy/caution àSome: novelty seeker/some not -all:
personal gene variance -Inside of pie-chart Immediate surroundings: -Family/toys/school/nursery ->thing that the kid comes
in direct contact with -Microsystems
-in America, grandparents are
less part of the family micro-system that in Israel ànext
circle in the pie -which quality on education
-economic situation of community Example:
the employer of parent could effect parent’s behavior on the kid -broader than immediate surroundings à
Macrosystems ànext
circle in the pie Socially acceptable positions/values ->last circle in the pie |
Biological effect on psychological developmentThe fundamental effect of genes
on personal development
|
Evolutionary genetic ‘inheritance’ |
-babies are born with intrinsic characteristics intrinsic to: 1) All mammals 2) All primates 3) All humans Mammals- breastfeeding –ability to get food from momPrimates- seek social stimulus / strong connections to parents Humans- speech GenesInfluence our Development àsets schedule for How/Whne we develop ài.e. what age we start walking/talking -human genes drive to try to inspect surroundings/solve problems àalso common to several more sophisticated
primates Human’s genetic curiosity-Most kids, by the age of 4 speak fluently 9chimps can hardly learn signs/symbols) à18 months, the baby starts to learn to speak àcan only understand some concepts/sentence structures -only at adolescence can the person
understand fully concepts Conclusion: The ability to learn a specific thing (i.e. speech) =genes What we in actuality will learn
(i.e. speech/which language) =development *social relations are also somewhat genetic: Genes help: 1)baby know how to get needed relationship: i.e. knows how/when to cry/smile by himself 2)Help kid want to play w/ kids his age @ playground 3) Adolescence: intimate relationships |
Personal genetic ‘inheritance’ |
-not all genetic influence are common to all humanityài.e. in a change of environment, the ones w/ the genes better to that environment survive àthe ones w/ genes which are not so
adaptable to that climate won’t survive Example in psychological Development:
-which will indirectly
effect how he is treated in society àsome babies more active; some are more shy/caution àSome: novelty seeker/some not -all:
personal gene variance Goodness of fitHow parent/kid relationship is influenced by genes àif kid’s genes fit’s parents’ action/lifestyle –goodness of fit is high àof
goodness of fit is low – tension àsometimes, b/c of goodness of fit , kid might bond w/ a parent better than w/ the other |
Genes interacting with environment |
-i.e.
effect of pregnant mom smoking, on kid
Question: To what degree do genes hinder
environment’s effect on certain areas of the body? AnswerChanneling-Genetic tendencies which are channeled past the environmental effects àkid won’t walk sooner if you try
to teach him! (except in extreme cases) Weddington: observed kids making speech gestures @ around 4-6 months (w/o any connection to society culture!) Channeled: how genes channel environmental effects. àkid
won’t walk sooner if you try to teach him! (except in extreme cases) -Other things are less channeled
–i.e. social relationships -genes give general behavioral trends. Environments just actualizes some and not others àthe longer the gene has been switched
on, the harder it is to revert it. -Channeling is first dominant and then lessens w/ time -i.e.
in first 2 years, development is identical in all kind/ after 2nd
year, split in kids development b/w individuals depending on culture/surrounding àGenes
are not everything!!!!! (context also has its influence!) -After a while, Environment also affect genes/Development ExampleGenes: control the time of speech development Practice/exposure
(environment): control the development of the region of
brain, according to the level/kind of speech Critical periodA period of time in which the baby needs a certain input in order to achieve optimum conditions [environmental/gene interaction] Examples
|
1) Transaction model
2) Bi-directional model
Snowball effect. Kid reacts a certain way to his environment, which prompts a certain response from parent/guardian; which prompts kid to act certain way, etc…
-a dynamic relationship where
both factors influence each other
-i.e. if kid has temperament, parent might give kid less attention
àboth
genetic.
-The more negative the kid
is, the more negative society id to him àthough they need more attention in
order to get hooked into society
End of chapter 2 (of the book) |
Immediate surroundings of childThings/people which have close relationship w/ kid i.e. which toys that parents
choose for the kids is also a factor in the kid’s development Factor Context-family members/kid relationship influences cognitive development Example: how
kid socializes/solves problems/roles he sees within family Family as a SystemMom: huge factor in development àthough not an exclusive factor àalso sibling/father (sometimes also
grandparents) *Mom’s care can also be influenced
by other family members àalso extended family Modern researchers: -family is nor a group of relationships
but rather a group w/ interwoven interactions of relationships
Bi-directional effects/reciprocal determinism-Parent/kid have a reciprocal relationship àeach
is influenced by the other’s development i.e. in parents
who believe in different roles for boys/girls àsend messages for different roles which
encourage kids to behave typical of their gender àwhich enhances parent’s position Transactional Model-Interactive relationship b/w kid and surroundings àtakes
into account parents/socioeconomic level -parents have some inbred tendencies/certain surroundings àtherefore
they relate to the kid in a certain way which encourages a certain direction
of development, which in turn prompts a new reaction Transactional model helps explain:
àUsually
developmental problems in pre-mature babies only occur in lower-income
families àprobably
b/c they have less time/more stress for kid -there is no indication of developmental problems for premature baby from middle class families. |
Characteristics of a Family system –Minuchim -researcher-Like a puzzle àsub-systems, for example: -sibling-sibling relationship àcould
have many sub-systems if there are many kids in the family àit
is like a puzzle b/c it usually mirrors the parent-child relationship
as well as the parent-parent relationship. -According to Minuchin:
àsome things done together/some done w/o knowledge of the other system ài.e. marital relationships
ài.e.
parental preference Example of a puzzle relationship-if a parent has a special
relationship w/ a child of the opposite gender, it is usually at the
expense of a good relationship w/ spouse *kids integration into the
family system changes it fundamentally *Parent’s hopes for a certain
gender of kid influences family system I.e. if family wants a boyàto fulfill a certain family structure àif a girl is born, dad is disappointed @ kid/mom (for not having a boy) àmom is disappointed for kid not
having improved spousal relationships In case of boy: the kid might be reinforced that he made the family complete àlater
in life, he will strive to keep family complete, i.e. in times of fights -Family structure also changes w/ new scenarios
Relationship b/w parents’ relationship and kid’s development-i.e.: the will to get marries/satisfaction w/ marriage/etc. |
Factors within the family structure |
Fathers within family systemOnly recently, researchers b/c interested in father’s direct/indirect influence on kid àuntil now, didn’t take active role: 1) Mom didn’t allow Studies: from infancy, kid is close to dad too. àRelationship
strengthens in childhood, especially w/ boys Experiment-Took a group of kids from divorced mom
Question: How come there is a change (improvement) in one of the groups? Answer: possibilities:
Nov 27 class fill-in
|
Siblings within a family structure-Siblings have both a direct/indirect
influence on development of kid Research -kids w/ older brothers are more competitive -kids w/ older sisters are
more feminine ‘Birth order effects’-
is the systematic differences in behavior that stem from the order of
birth.
i.e.2nd child less striving for educational success than 1st àBut is more sociable -there are many factors for that phenomenon: i.e. 2nd child gets less attention at childrearing age that 1st child àbut is forces to socialize w/ older
sibling Please note: influence on siblings are not unison in all families àEven
in families w/ same # of kids; same age/gender èit also depends on how the older kids were prepared to accept the experience of a new sibling (b/f/ his birth) èalso
the family’s ability to adapt to the new child scenario Learning from older siblings: Direct: Older kids teach younger kids how to do thingsàusually use negative comments like: ‘you are so stupid…’ -Negative comments helps kid’s development àgets
him to push harder Indirect:
Observation Conclusion: Family is a series of interrelated relationships of:
(àSee Minuchin above) |
Close relationships outside of the family |
-As the
kids grows he in encountered w/ relationships outside the family
|
Socioeconomic context |
Includes:
-Intimate community: Family/day-care/peers/school -Community: Political organizations/health care/religious institutions - Broader community:
family size expectation/ standard marriage age/crime rate i.e. if inflation
rate/unemployment/crime =high, pressures on low-income parent will be
higher, and might affect for the worse the upbringing of kid Changes in the family b/c socioeconomic factor-(Examples are of American statistics)
Mom’s work and it’s influence: Factors: 1) kid’s age when mom starts to go to work 2) Quality of the time spent together after the work 3) Day care quality 4) Mom-child relationship 5) Probably most important:
how mom sees her role regarding parenthood [regardless of whether she
is working or not] Single parenthoodIn the last 25 years, astonishing increase in single moms -Decrease in teenage moms (though
there is an increase b/w 1987-1991 -teenage-moms’ kids often have cognitive/behavioral problems àit could be that the low income of such families is the cause of these problems àbut
the comparison of poor single families to poor 2 parent families reveals
that low income is not the deciding factor -the teen-mom’s kid’s developmental problems are not inevitable àin
culture where teen-moms have support of extended families, kids’ developmental
problems seem to be minimal. àsome finish high-school successfully Divorced parents-Huge effect on school-age kids
Second divorce: -More Complicated effect on kids:
Factors depend on:
Question: is
this decline in kid’s behavior a result of divorce or the fighting
b/w the parents Answer:
-no difference whether only
one parent has guardianship over kid or both (as long as there are no
fights b/w parents -parents continuing fighting/continued
fighting has most influence, regardless of the guardianship arrangement.
(as long as arrangement doesn’t cause further tension/arguments) àadolescents
deal w/ divorce best (given that there is cooperation and no more
quarrelling b/w parents) ànew
stresses might play a factor in the development of a child if his guardian
has financial constrains due lower income due to the divorce. Other, non-conventional families-Single person who wants to adopt a kid w/o marriage -Homosexual marriage -Homosexual marriages seem not to affect kid’s gender role/psychological development àit
seems like in those cases, other factors, such as social factors influence
kid more than parents’ sexual orientation Social class/poorness/stressors and the family-Social Class
–ranking an individual/family by income within a society Question: what are some basic differences b/w lower class/middle classes in upbringing kids? Answer: -lower class focus more on physically disciplining the kid/listening to parent -middle class focus more on
rationalizing w/ kid/encouraging expression àboth might have negative outcomes: #1) might lead to abuse #2) might lead to kid feeling
overly guilty -the best way is: 1)valid/consistent rules 2)allow the kid to input in
rules/decision *negative feedback from mom
usually reflective of low income, not of mom working *1/5 kids in America are poor * ½ of black/Hispanic kids *single parent families are more likely to be under poverty line *single-moms are fastest growing
group of homeless -kids who grow under-poverty-line suffer from more severe diseases àoften
starts b/f birth Usually, poverty kids face these problems: -poor nutrition/access to worse health care -more prone to diseases/injuries (due to their surroundings at home -lack of iron -more stress at home àeconomic uncertainty -more prone to problems like loss of job/crime/evacuation -Chronic problems: crowded
residency/bad neighborhood/poor living conditions) àall of these have bad influence on kid’s development àparents w/ hard economic conditions might b/c depressed/easily-angered àand therefore use more threats/punishments/use more commanding/degrading tone of voice/physical abuse àsometimes enhanced by social out-casting/loneliness
of parents *Abuse takes place in all social classes àbut more widespread in lower-class *kid in not only exposed to
violence at home, but also in neighborhood/school *In some cases, poorness is a vicious circleàgenerations of that family will be poor àBecause of family behavior (due to
stressors) Cultural influences-all kids have common genes
(regardless of culture) àthey all need to be taken care of. Cultural context
|
Video, Dec 4, 2000
Piaget noted 4 cognitive development stages
‘besheila’=? (Pp. 100,
2ns paragraph 2nd line)
Chapter 4 notes:
Children are born w/
Characteristics of child’s earliest abilities
-Throwing up: anti-chocking reflex
-Sucking reflex – to guarantee food
-Crying reflex – to get
appropriate attention
-i.e. when a baby hears a voice, his reflexes turn his head in that direction
à
later in life, those reflexes become more complex
àin order to learn how to recognize faces
àConnection
b/w event and it’s result is called ‘Contingency’
One way to research babies'
development id to study the cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex -the outer layer of the cerebrum
-->where most intellectual
processes take place
Neurons: basic
building blocks of the nervous system
After birth - first 15 months
-slight increase in # of neurons-sharp increase in size of neurons
-Sharp increase in # of connections
Myelin
-Fatty substance that helps transmit the electric messages within the
brain
--
Baby conditions
-Babies has many daily conditions
Classification
Sleep: Active/inactive
Awakeness active/quiet
Distress fussying/crying
sleep
-infants spend over 16 hours a day sleeping
-->sleep amount decreases
w/ growth
-sleep is not organized into
a day/night scheme
-within North American society, day/night scheme is shown in babies 8 weeks old
-->probably b/c North American
parents try to keep baby awake more during day/sleep more @ night
Inactive sleep
-Baby sleeps quietly -w/o movements
-slow breath
Active sleep
-REM-like eye movements
-movements of limbs
-faster breathing
-Infants don't have the organized brain wave pattern that adults have
-->only starts to show @
3 months
Distress situation
Types of cries
Angry: sudden/loud cry
Hunger: starts softly/gets louder
Pain: starts w/ shriek/
continues loudly
-w/ experience, we can learn
to differentiate b/w them
Calming effect
-pacifier
-vocal stimulation
-changing diaper
-movements
-hugging
-->each baby is calmed differently
-some babies calm easier/harder
Changes in baby conditions: with time, baby's conditions (the ones mentioned above) b/c more predictable
Reflexes
reflex: automatic/inborn response to a particular stimulus
-some of the reflexes are on
a survival basis, i.e. blinking/sneezing
Reflex | Description | Developmental pattern |
Sucking |
When object brushes against infant’s lip, rhythmic sucking occurs | Replaced by voluntary sucking by 2 months |
Babkin | When infant is lying down, pressure on palms of both hands causes head to turn straight ahead, mouth to open, eyes to close | Disappears around 3 mos. |
Stepping | When baby held upright/lowered until feet touch surface, walking-like reflexes occur | Disappears around 3 mos. |
Grasping | Pressure on palm causes palms to curl àstrong enough to hold its own weight | Weakens after 3 mos. –disappears after 1 year |
Tonic neck | Infant that is placed on back tends to turn head/leg/arm to that side, and flex the limbs on the other side (like fencing position) | Disappears @ 4 mos. |
Rooting | -baby reflexes to move sideways when cheek stroked | Disappears @ 4 mos. |
Moro | Arms/hands clamp if baby falls backwards | Disappears @ 5 mos. |
Babinski | When side of foot it stroked from heal to toe, toes fan out/foot twists inwards | Disappears @ 1 yr. |
Blink | In response to flash of light/puff in the air | Permanent |
-Developmental psychologists
are more interested in reflexes which disappear w/ acquirement of more
advances skills, than w/ those who are lifelong.
1)Rooting reflex -baby reflexes to move sideways when cheek stroked -->to find breast to feed on
2)sucking reflex
- when something gets entered in baby’s mouth, it starts sucking
-both reflexes help baby feed
until it knows how to find the nipple itself
à
2-4 months - these reflexes disappear -->gives way to voluntary sucking
Other reflexes
-Some reflexes are from our
evolutionary past.
Examples
Moro Reflex
-arms/hands clamp if baby falls backwards
-->probably ape's way to grab tree/mom in case it falls
Grasping reflex
-when baby's hand stroked, it grasps -->strong enough to hold baby's weight
-->by 3rd month, baby can
grasp voluntary.
--
Stepping reflex
If baby is held upright and
feet touch the floor, his legs move reflexively as if he is walking
-disappears at 3 months but
reappear several months later, when the baby is ready to walk
-in early infancy, reflexes (such as grasping/stepping) is controlled by lower command centers
-->w/ development, higher
brain control takes over and inhibits those reflexes
-->suddenly, babies can voluntarily do things which were reflexes until now
-->maturation of brain is
related to the myelination as well as the proliferation of connections
among neurons in the cerebral cortex
--
Infant learning
Habituation vs. Dishabituation
Habituation:
decrease in attention when a stimuli is repeated
Ways to measure habituation:
1) looking time 2) visual recognition memory (H. fast kids recognize new things)
Orienting Response
The psychological/behavioral changes which takes place when a stimuli is first presented
-->i.e. heartbeat change/slight dilation of the eye pupils
à
increased awareness/attention
Dishabituation
After a while of dis-learning/disinterest
of the habituation to a particular stimulus, renewed, increased attention
For habituation to take place:
1)child needs to realize that the stimulus is same as the previous time it has experianced it
2)Compare 1st and 2nd stimulus to recognize the 2nd as new
Associative learning
Associative learning - how infants learn that several events are associated w/ each other
à
certain stimuli goes w/ certain scenario
* 2 kinds of associative learning: Classical conditioning/Instrumental conditioning
Classical conditioning
-to associate a new stimulus
w/ an old stimulus and its established reflex response
Example:
-Ivan Pavlov (psychologist) - caused dogs to salivate by ringing a bell when they eat. eventually they salivated to the sound of the bell w/o having food in from of them
Instrumental Conditioning
-also called Operant conditioning
-learning behaviors through
the influence of their consequences
Positive reinforcements: the presentation of a pleasant stimulus following a behavior, to increase likelihood it will be repeated
-->example:
baby gets bread every time he says 'beh'
Negative reinforcements: the removal of unpleasant stimulus to increase likelihood of that behavior
-->example:
baby's diaper changed every time he cries
Punishment: the presentation of a unpleasant stimulus to discourage behavior from repeating
-->Example:
kid slapped every time he does something wrong
-Reinforcement: any event that follows a behavior that increases the likelihood that the behavior will be repeated
-->the dogs associated the
bell sound w/ the food
Shaping: reinforcing which gradually gets closer to the target behavior
-->example:
if baby said 'beh' every time he wants bread, the dad might repeat the
word 'bread, and eventually only give kid when his mumbling becomes
closer and closer to the word 'bread'
Imitative learning:
-behaviors learnt by imitation of others.
-->faster way of learning than shaping
-->child must be able to
reproduce and remember the behavior for future use.
Imitation development
Before 6 months
Baby can match behaviors if perceptual consequences, such as sound. i.e. if baby makes a certain sound, and the adult repeats it, the bay will often repeat it
Beginning at 6 months
-babies will try to imitate sounds/behaviors that they have seen but never done before.
At 12 months
-Babies b/c much better at imitating unfamiliar behaviors
At 18 months
-imitation is very accurate
The concept of Preparedness
-genetic disposition to learn certain behaviors
Examples
Infant motor skills
0-2 months –chin up
2-4 months –chest up
2-5 months –rolls over
5-8 months –sits w/o support
5-10 months –stands, holding on something
6-10 months –pulls self to stand
7-13 months –walks w/ support
10-14 months –stands alone
11-14 months –walks well
14-22 months walks up stairs
Motor kills and physical growths
-infant motor skills develop
within a context of drastic growth
-average growth within the first year:
à
kid must learn to deal w/ limbs that are growing/change proportions
Some Principles of motor Development
Differentiation
-everything we learn, motorically,
starts simple and becomes more advanced:
Example:
*An adult covers a baby’s
face
-a newborn will wildly wiggle clumsily his whole body until adult’s hand is off
-several weeks later, more usage of arm (specialized function!) but the arm movement will be focused closer to center of body
-at 6 months, the baby can move adult’s hand is one swipe
-a month or 2 later, baby will
cover face in anticipation/protection
Cephalocaudal Development
-Development starts closer to the brain continues downwards
à
eye movement/refined sucking
will come b/f walking
Proximodistal development
-development starts @ center of body and extends outwards
à
i.e. –arms develop motorically
b/f hands which develop motorically b/f fingers
The joint role of maturation and experience
-Maturation gives the general outline for the ability.
-the experience gives the practical ability/refinedness
The development of specific motor skills
Focus of the book is on several motoric skills:
Controlled eye movements
-eye movements are quite automatic
-->one of the earliest to develop.
-->helps young infant study what is around him to discover his environment
-learning would be severely
limited w/o eye movement
-when they are bored, their
eyes move more -->to find something to look at.
-in the beginning, eyes can almost only focus on bright/dark contrasts
Pursuit eye movements
-The smooth, continuous movements of the eye to follow moving objects
* In younger age, baby can only follow slow moving objects w/ pursuit eye movements
Saccadic eye movements
-the rapid, jerky eye-movements that occur when person looks at new object
-->adult can do it in 1 movement
-->infants seed several movements to move eyes to new objects
-->also use saccadic movements to follow faster moving objects instead of 'pursuit eye movements'
Reaching and grasping
-both reaching/grasping are
behaviors that are inborn; then they decline/disappear, and then reappear
much more advanced
prereaching
-a reflex of an infant to spontaneously
try to reach for objectw/i it's gaze, even though he can't reach
it
-b/w 1-4 months, there is a decline in prereaching
-by 4 months, there is voluntary reaching
-by 15 months, there is smooth/accurate
reaching ability
-->the reflex is a learning aid to help the baby coordinate what he sees and his arm
-->also to coordinate the
(his) hand he sees w/ the object he wants
-->this process does not lead to the ability to reach w/o seeing arm!!!
-->by 15 months, the baby is able to reach for things glowing in the dark (where he can't see his arm)
-->successful reach w/o visual audio info
Study:
-Brain Maturation allows for reaching skill to develop
-Environmental situation (experience)
develops this potential within the kid
-Babies tend to reach only
for things within their reach (through extending arm as well as other
parts of body)
i.e.:
-baby who is 5 months old has undergone enough maturation to lean forward to reach.
-a younger baby won't even try to reach for the object
-by 8-10 months, the baby leans to lean and reach simultaneously
-->whereas the 5 month old would first reach, then see that he can't reach, then lean and then reach.
Grasping
-by 3-4 months, baby can voluntarily grasp
-by 6 months, he can let go
-by 8 months, he can use thumb against rest of fingers
-by 1 year, he can oppose the thumb/forefinger (and pick up small things)
Walking
-by 7 months, baby can crawl in some fashion or other -->mobility
-b/f 1 year -can walk w/ support of objects
-around 1st year, take solo
step
-variances in age where walking starts should not be seen as a problem, unless the delay is extreme
Stepping reflex
-stepping reflex-declines around
2 months
Researchers' positions on why it declines:
1) Brain is developing -->ability to inhibit reflexes allows for organization of development.
à
w/o organization of development,
the brain might go on overload
2) Body mass b/c too big to reflex
Study
-Esther Thalans
-Stepping reflex can be evokes in babies up to 7 months, who are put over a treadmill
-the walking depends on the integration of many systems, i.e. balance
-jerky movements (such as the
reflexes/stereotypic movements associated w/ moving the legs) leads
to smoother movements which enable kid to develop advances skills, such
as walking
Stereotypic movement - the movements of a limb that is nor voluntary, nor reflexes -->it is a series of movements caused by a wide variety of stimuli
-->usually evoked by excitement
-->steppingstone in development
b/w reflexes and voluntary motoric acts
-->onset of walking depends
on both maturation of nerve system/musscles and practice
Study (done in 1940)
Example #1
-Hopi Indians restrain their infants in very physically constraining boxes
-the babies were given freedom from this constraint at about a year (which is where non-constraint kids start to walk)
-->they also started to
walk
Conclusion -shows that maturation is a bigger factor in learning to walk than practice
Example #2
-Ache people (of S. America) constrain kids for several years
-->kids start walking way
past 2nd year
Conclusion: prolonged restraint delays the development of walking
Examples
-Kipsigis tribe of Kenya teaches their babies to walk as early as 3rd month
-->the average for starting
to walk is 3 weeks b/f N/A babies
Conclusion: practice
has some influence
-nevertheless, studies show that the effect of practice (of the reflexes) as opposed to mere maturation exists, but is minimal
à
not worth practicing something which is anyways canalized
Sensory Systems in the newborn
Vision
Visual acuity - the degree to which one can see fineness of details
-->even adults w/ perfect eyesight has somewhat limited acuity
-->adult has to look closely/under
magnifying glass to realize that a picture in the textbook is really
made from many small dots
-babies meet the criterion
for being legally blind (their visual acuity is so poor)
Determining how clearly babies see
Preferential looking
-based on babies tendency to look at things of higher contrast
Experiment
-babies was shown gray card vs. stripped black and white cards. Then showed increasingly narrow stripes on the stripped cards.
à
eventually, the babies did
not show preference for the stripped cards
-At 2 weeks, baby’s sight is 20/300 (baby sees at 20 memters what an adult can see at 300
-at 5 months, 20/100
Visual evoked potentials
-measures brain activity to see if baby can tell the difference b/w objects
Problem:
it gives a higher estimate than reality
àit can focus sharp image on Retina (the back of the eye, which is light sensitive)
à
but brain visual system/Rerina is yet immature
Studies
-visual experience w/ pattern needed for development of sight. W/o sight during development = insufficient sight
Can Babies see color?
Hearing
Studies show that a fetus can hear by 26-28 months after conception
-ability to detect direction of sound
à
very early skill
à
by 18 months, it is at adult levels
-at first, baby’s hearing capabilities are weak. Has to be 10-20 decibels louder
à
by 12/13
à
same as adults
Question
How well can babies discriminate b/w sounds?
Answer
Tool to find out: habituation studies:
Example
-Present baby a certain sound until he gets habituated (disinterested in it)
The present a different sound,
and measure the reaction. If there is renewed reaction, then the baby
has detected the difference in sound.
-->babies are better w/
higher than lower pitches
Studies show:
-babies can distinguish better b/w speach sounds than w/ pitches
-->i.e. by 1 month, baby
can distinguish b/w 'bah' and 'pah' as well as adults
categorical perception
-putting a series of perceptions
into categories
-humans, as young as babies use categorical perception
Smell and taste
Smell
-babies respond to odors similar to adults
-->facial expressions/body
movements similar to adults
* Habituation studies show that babies can make refined odor distinctions:
-->i.e. mom's perfume vs. other perfume
-mom's nursing pad vs. other nursing pad
Taste
-babies can discriminate b/w/ sweet/bitter/salty
-->babies can discriminate
b/w/ plain water and weak sugar solution
-at birth, taste-buds are present
and localized in the main aread of the tongue, but the taste nervous
system is not fully developed yet.
Organization of Infant sensory Behavior
-during waking hours, babies spend a lot of effort learning about their environment.
-->They scan for contrast
areas. after they find it, they scan it for a while, then move on
-as babies grow older, they scan more for internal features of the object
Development of Perceptual Abilities
Perception:
the process which the brain interprets info from the sendes, giving
it order and meaning
Depth and Distance perception:
Experiment:
Babies in a crib:
1)one side of it had a pattern
2)Other side =see-through to
below - had a pattern below
-by 7-8 months, as babies started to crawl, they showed preference for side which is not see-through
-->as they got older, this preference increased.
-->start of fear of heights
in adulthood
-some studies show that babies
can already perceive height at 2 months old
-The info comes to the Retina in 2D. the brain uses 2 techniques to decipher it into a #D image
-Kinetic depth cues
-Binocular depth cues
Kinetic depth cues:
-information about depth and distance assumed through its motion
-->i.e. expansion of size
of object
-'monocular'
- only 1 eye is needed in order to make this assumption
Study: babies
blink more often to a computer screen where objects b/c bigger. They
also blinked more often to objects on the screen that appear to get
then rather than those that appeared to miss them
-'Accretion-deletion' -when a background disappear and then reappears, you assume that the object that moved is in front of the background
-->Accretion = reappearance
-babies start to use it at age 3, but only start to use it on a regular basis @ age 5-7 months
Binocular depth cues
-visual cues for depth/distance assumed by the fact that info reaches both eyes
Convergence
-brain measures the angle (convergence)
of the eyes. the more they look inwards, the closer the brain assumes
that the object is
*Studies show that by 1 months babies use convergence. by 5 months, they do it accurately.
Retinal disparity
By combining the info of both
the retinas, which happens to be slightly different, the brain assumes
that the image is 3D (i.e. perceives the depth)
-babies start to show sensitivity to retinal disparity @ 3 months.
-by 5 months, they effectively
use this tool
Strabismus -
the condition where the eyes are misaligned (cross-eyed)
-Strabismus affected people do not get the full experience they need to develop binocular cueing.
-->could be altered through surgery. though if it is done after 1 year of age, the binocular cueing won't work as well.
Conclusion
->it shows that both maturation of the brain and practical experience is needed.
->moreover, maturation equally
affects experience. If baby is born w/o brain cells responsible for
binocular cues, but normal eye muscles, he will b/c cross-eyes, b/c
brain doesn't tell him when his eyes are aligned or not
-->W/ sight, brain development/visual experience influence each other in a circular way
Pictorial depth cues
-cues which can depict depth/distance in 2D images
-->'static cues' -they do
not depend on motion
linear perception
-parallel lines that seem to
converge as they extend away from viewer
Looking at a trapezoid:
* w/ 1 eye -looks like a slanted rectangle
* W/ 2 eyes - looks like a
trapezoid
Interposition:
-when objects appear to overlap, the one perceived to be in the forground is assumed to be in front of the other
Shading
-shading by protrusions/depressions
in a surface is detected by its shades
-babies b/c sensitive to those depth cues around the same time they are sensitive to linear cues (around age 5-7 months)
Size/Shape constancy
Size constancy:
the ability to perceive an object from different distances as the same size, despite that it appears bigger/smaller in the Retina
Shape consistency
-the ability to perceive an
object being the same shape despite seeing from different angles
Studies show:
Perception of Faces
-complex procedure of learning
that requires several steps.
-newborns -can recognize mom's face
-3 months -can recognize her on a picture
-5 months -can remember strangers'
faces
--
-At first, babies prefer moving
face-like image than static/blank face
Question:
-if baby prefers moving faces/learns
to recognize mom's face fats, why does it take so long for general face
perceptions to develop?
Answer:
-different neurological/visual
info is used at various ages.
i.e.
-at first, babies use outline to discriminate b/w objects:
-->babies can discriminate b/w basic shapes, but can't distinguish b/w/ square w/ circle in it vs. square w/ triangle in it.
-->only later, can babies
start to discriminate b/w internal features of an object [which is a
requirement for face-recognition]
-->follows general outline of face -->the cerebral cortex is not used
->development of areas in the cerebrum cortex allows for use of it
First Adaptations in context
-biology inbuilt reflexes in
the kids to babies to respond to their environment
-some pre-adapted preferences, i.e. attraction to light/dark contrast/ attraction to human voice
-->helps them socially
interact by being attracted to humans through being attracted to human
faces/voices
-environment gives baby experiences
needed to develop brain/motoric skills/perceptual abilities/behaviors
-babies/adults are bias to
direct attention t/w each other
[summery of chapter on page 152-153 of textbook]
Class, Dec. 18, 2000
Rule: kids like to interact with familiar things, but they like to look at new things
--
Chapter
5 in textbook
Advances:
-basic understanding of the physical world, including property of objects and relationships b/w objects
-use of basic cognitive tools: categorization/to number/to understand the world
-combine actions into sequences to get desirable ends
-increasingly powerful/flexible abilities
Limitations
-emphasis on perceptual info/action as sourses of knowledge of the world
-absance of symbol/language ability
-limited flexability in many emerging cognitive abilities
-limited memory capacity
Piaget's theory of infant cognitive development
Assumptions about the nature of infants
Sensorimotor period - the first 2 years of the infants life, where awareness of environment is limited to what baby can know through senses/motoric acts
-->piaget thought that baby is actively constructing and understanding of the world
-->Piaget thought that motor activity is essential to development
-->passive observation is not enough
-kids at first discover things by accident by moving their limbs/manipulate parts of their bodies
-->later, discoveries are more intentional -->kids deliberately try out actions and investigate their consequences
Processes of Developmental change
2 aspects of Piaget's theory of cognitive development:
Adaptation/equilibrium
Adaptation
How children change to b/c more efficient in their surroundings
-->i.e. how a kid learns
how to drink from a cup instead of a bottle.
Adaptation has 2 elements:
assimilation and accommodations
-Assimilation: applying old techniques to new scenarios
-Accommodation:
modifying an old technique to adapt to a new skill
Schemes: in Piaget's theory: cognitive structure structures that could be applied in various scenarios
-->b/c increasingly abstract w/ development
Equilibration
Regulating one's skills to match the demands of the environment.
-->i.e. if the environment
requires me to drink out of a cup, instead of a bottle, I will change
my behavior so that my skills will develop in a way that allows me to
be efficient in the new environment
-->disequilibrium - when my skills are lacking to the demands of environment. Piaget argued that there is a natural response to correct disequilibrium into equilibrium
-->called 'Equilibration'
Sensorimotor Stages
Piaget divided development into 6 sensorimotoric stages
-->each = increasingly complex
-->w/ more advanced interactions
w/ environment, baby's schemes adapt to more scenarios
Note:
1) In each stage, Piaget in merely describing the most advanced level for that stage (at beginning of stage, baby will only start to acquire those skills)
2) The ages are approximate. The important element is the sequence; not their precise timing.
3) Piaget is only one way to
describe/explain development
|
Stage 1 –Reflexes –Birth
à
1 month
-actions are limited to genetically programmed ‘reflexes’*
à
limited range of behaviors
à
no new behaviors developing
at this stage
*Note:
piaget’s definition of the word reflex: any act which is naturally
inborn in the child. i.e. active looking
-at this stage, some of the
standard reflexes (i.e. grasping/sucking) are refined
Stage 2 –primary circular reaction -1-4 months old
Circular reaction: a behavior which produces an interesting event, initially by accident
-->then the act is repeated
in order to achieve the same event.
Stage 2: primary circular reactions (1-4 months)
-the baby learns how to use own body by circular evens: his action leads to a certain reaction.
Example
-The baby randomly moves arms,
until he hits mouth, which starts sucking.
Stage 3: secondary circular reaction (4-8 months)
-the baby learns circular reactions
of external objects
Example:
-a baby knocks a spoon off
the table by accident. He finds the reaction of the spoon falling to
the ground interesting. then he repeats it.
Stage 4: coordination of schemes (8-12 Months)
Coordination of schemes: a goal-oriented chain of behaviors
-->baby goes things instrumentally.
(for other purposes)
Example:
-baby knows that there is an object of interest behind an object
-->baby will knock front
object out of the way. (or go around the object to get to the requested
object.
Stage 5: tertiary circular reactions (12-18 months)
-a circular reaction involving
trial-and-error
Example:
-baby throws an object is a
various ways to establish the-cause and-effect
Stage 6: beginning of representational thought (18-24 months)
Deferred imitation: imitation of observed behavior after a while.
-->it indicated the baby's ability to store a representation of a certain behavior in memory
Symbolic/representational thought
-the ability to make something stand for another thing.
-->in infancy, it is still primitive
-->babies now don't have to go through physical actions to solve problems
Order of development
-Reflexes-->lead to sensorimotoric actions
-Sensorimotoric actions-->lead to representational thought
Challenges to Piaget's theory
-his observations are accepted,
but his conclusions are challenged
Major areas of disagreement:
* Timetables for emergence of distinct developmental stages
* The existence of qualitatively distinct developmental stages
* The range of innate abilities
* Source of infants' cognitive limitations
Reassessing the timetables for infant Development
-Researchers suggest that Piaget underestimated baby’s skills at various stages.
àPiaget was aware of this problem. He called it Decalage
àsome researchers concluded that there are 2 kinds of development: general and specific. As a result, some skills/cognitive tasks are independent of general progress of development
Reassessing infant’s inborn abilities
-Piaget assumed that baby is born w/ reflexes that spark learning
à
some neo-nativists assume
that baby has some inborn knowledge/abilities
Neo-nativism
= a contemporary development theory that assumed baby is born w/ inborn
knowledge/skills
Reassessing Infants’ cognitive constraints
-some researchers think that the development is constrained by limits of information-processing capabilities (working memory)
à
Working memory:
the information-processing capacity at any given time
à
not, as Piaget suggested, a lack of mental representation
Example
If baby has to find hidden toy/imitate person
à
needs to memorize an order of events
à
if his working memory gets filled, there is a kind of information overload
à
kid can’t progress w/ action
-with brain developments and some actions b/c more automatic
à
cognitive development in the
working-memory allows for more abstract actions
Infants understanding
of the Physical world
Object Permanence:
the understanding that objects continue to exist even when they are
out of sight.
Piaget thought that object permanence is developed over 6 stages
Sensorimotoric stage 1/2
Birth-4 months
-babies have no concept of object permanence
* during this stage, babies
will start to follow objects and reach them (once they have acquired
voluntary reaching
--> but if the object is blocked from view, the baby will lose interest.
-->even if object is only partially covered (i.e. nipple of bottle covered -->baby won't perceive it as a bottle -->loose interest in it)
Sensorimotor stage 3
4-8 months
-will recognize objects if they are partially covered
-->will need a partial cue to be reminded of the object (i.e. seeing some if it.)
Sensorimotor stage 4
8-12 months
-baby will move things to find
something that is hidden
But:
-it is still a limited object permanence.
-->i.e. if you continually hide a toy in a specific place, the baby will find it. After a while, if you hide it somewhere else, the baby will look in the place you used to hide it. then he will look randomly for it (even though you saw him hide it in the new place)
-this is called A not-B error
Sensorimotoric stage #5
-12-18 months
-baby no longer makes A not-B Error. they will rather look at the last place that the object was seen.
-->i.e. if they saw a ball in someone's hand. this person closes hand (hides ball) and then puts it under a cloth -->the baby will look in the hand and not under cloth. after they are disappointed at not finding ball under cloth, they look randomly
Sensimotoric stage #6
-18-24 months
baby will now have a mature understanding of object permanence
-->they can imagine the
objects that they do not necessarily see
à
various theories to show that piaget’s age classification might be are inaccurate
ß
-Some researchers claim earlier ages for those developmental stages
-->i.e. if a substantial minority of infants learnt this task, they considered it a learned task for that age-group
Perception of partially hidden objects
Study (kellman/spelke)
-this study thought that babies recognize partial hidden objects sooner than piaget suggested.
-->i.e. a box moved back and forth blocking the middle section of a rod
-->babies looked longer at a rod that is split in the middle that 1 long rod (see page 170)
Evidence of object permanence in stage 3 babies
-some studies show that 4-8
months olds have some understanding of object permanence
à
i.e. babies reached for objects
in the dark. [they didn’t see it as they reached for it
Studies
Study #1
Habituation case :
Test cases:
Conclusion:
àshows their understanding of object permanence
Follow-up
* 4½ month old –had no accurate idea as to where the screen would stop
* 6 months old – had accurate idea as to where the screen should stop
Study #2
Habituation case
Test Cases
[In reality, the block was moved before the train rolled by, so it appeared to the baby that the train was passing through the box which was on the tracks]
Conclusion
àThe also understood that an object
can block the movement of another
[see page 171 for drawings of studies]
Explaining the infant’s search behavior
Question
Why, then, according to those who place the object permanence b/f Piaget does, is there a disparity b/w the development of object permanence and searching for hidden objects?
Answer
Baillargeon
Bbabies start to search, but they do not have the skill of goal-oriented chain of behavior until stage 4 (8 months).
à
has to do w/ cerebral cortex’s maturation
Question
Conclusion
Causality and other relations b/w objects
-Babies need to understand
relationship b/w objects to make sense of perceptional info
Piaget - this ability comes gradually as a result of sensorimotoric exploration
Modern researchers: -comes earlier than Piaget thought
-perhaps inborn
Studies show:
Study #1
7 months babies shown:
Case #1
'Causal event': Brick hits another one which gets launched
-->after habituation, prceeded to case #2
Case #2
'Non-Causal event' brick hits another brick
-->delayed launching of 2nd brick
-->bricks don't get touch, but the 2nd one gets launched anyways
Conclusion:
7 months old babies can tell cause of some events
Study #2
Case of objects being launched b/c they are hit by an object
6 Months old
-can tell cause using balls
10 months old
Can tell cause w/ all toys
Study #3
4 1/2 months old babies look longer at objects suspended in the air.
-->shows their understanding that something is illogical
Study #4
Box moved across a platform
Possible event Box stopped @ end of platform
Impossible event:
only edge of the box is still on platform, yet it doesn't fall.
-not all 5-6½ months old could understand that case #2 is an impossible event
à
even some 9 ½ couldn’t
[see page 174 for a drawing of this experiment]
Conclusion of the studies
-babies get rudimentary grasp of relations b/w objects @ 4-8 months
(Piaget’s stage 3)
à
but still only in basic scenatios
-by 8-12 months (Piaget’s Sensorimotoric stage #4), it gets more complicated
Number
Piaget: concept of numbers is beyond sensorimotoric period
Other studies:
4-7 months old have some concept of #’s
Study:
4 groups of babies
-babies habituated to 2 –showed interest in 3
-babies habituated to 3 -showed interest in 2
à
not those w/ 4/6 dots
Question
Answer
Study #1
-8 months babies has 2 boxes of 2/3 toys
Study #2
-babies shown a doll than screen hid the doll
-hand comes out of screen w/ another doll then goes back behind screen.
-hand comes out of screen again
w/ no doll
à
when screen comes up, babies shown 0,1,2 dolls
à
show more interest in 1 doll
Conclusion: they probably expected to see 2!
Study #3
-2-3 months old shown pattern: 2 pictures on right, 1 picture on left
à
learned to tell this numerical
pattern
--
Conclusion
-Babies seem to have numerical skills, yet it is limited to 3 or under.
Categorization
Categorization- the ability to put into a general scheme from past experience/knowledge
Example
-at 3 months, baby can distinguish b/w animals
à
even though baby has not concept of ‘animal’
Study
7-11 months given toys of same
category
à
showed decreased interest in
each category of toys after time
Generalization: babies (14 months) generalized about animals broadly (i.e. to drink from cup/sleep in bathtub
à
not done those generalizations
w/ vehicles!
As seen, sometimes, generalization is too broad
-i.e. doll put to bed in bathtub
à
by 18 months, generalization is more specific
Conclusion
3 months =perceptual categorization
7 months =conceptual categorization
11 months =application of categorization in behavior
18 months = more specific categorization
Memory development in infancy
Recognition memory
Recognition memory- a type of memory to which a certain stimulus is perceived to be familiar
Recall
Recall –active retrieval of info from memory
à
requires repression of memory
-At first, babies could only have recognition memory
à
later in infancy, memory developes
Newborn – has some memory skills, i.e. mom’s smell/voice/face
à
until 3 months, babies have
problems w/ remembering visual info, such as angles. They can’t recognize
angles as being the same, when the angle was changed orientation (see
top of page 178)
-humans perceive things comparing them to other things already in memory
à
but at first, babies remember things independently of other things they know
à
that is why they can’t at
first recognize things like faces at first
-babies, at first, only remember things for hours/days
à
within month or 2, memory ability increases to weeks
à
once memory is gone, in could
be reactivated
àthey
have trouble retrieving it w/o clear-cut cues
Cued Recall-
type of memory that a familiar stimulus triggers recall of stored info
-up to 6 months – recall is context-bound
à
change of room/color of object might disrupt the recall
Development of memory at first 6 months
Memory in later infancy
-emotional development is dependant
on development in 2nd 6 months of life (6-12 months old)
-helps in development of object permanence
à
based on development of working memory skill
Example
-at 8 months, babies can find hidden object after a 2 second delay
-12-15 months –babies can find hidden object after 10 second delay
à
increase in working memory
By 11 months= baby able to reproduce actions such as putting a button into a box and shaking box.
à
3 months later, baby is able
to recall and reproduce act
By 16 months-complex sequences:
-a baby can undress/bathe a
dull
à
baby is capable of deferred imitation earlier than Piaget thought.
--
7 months – able to remember usual locations of objects
11 months – able to remember unusual location
Memory improvement b/w 6-18 months
àsooner
than Piaget thought
-B/w/ 6-18 months, baby is less dependant of perceptual cues
Analysis of info shows:
-some w/ high infant test scores, score average/below average IQ
-some w/ low infant test scores, score average/high IQ
Brain development and infant memory
-infant memory is not carried to later in life
Explicit/declarative memory
-conscious memory. It involved mental representation of images/ideas
-->could be explicitly explained/declared
Implicit/procedural memory
-unconscious memory, involving procedures or skills
-->does not lend itself to explicit memory
Example
Bicycle
-memory of learning to ride/receiving first bike
-->explicit/declarative
memory
-the memory of how to ride = implicit/procedural
-->well learnt skill
Chuck Nelson
-First 6 months, most memory acquired is implicid.
-->Dependant on hippocampus/cerebrum’s
development
-after 6 months, development of a connection b/w cerebral cortex and hippocampus
--> Development of the memory
skills
Infantile Amnesia- the phenomenon of adults not remembering infancy [see page 182, as well as what was just discussed]
Social context and cognitive development in infancy
Socio-cultural view –adults structure the environment for the kids.
-->cognitive development affected by stimulation received at hime
Middle class
-focus is more on cognitive/perceptual development (i.e. toys/objects)
-->more emphasis on academics
Lower Class
-Emphasis is less on academics
-->less cognitive stimulation
Cross-cultural research shows:
I.e.
Babies in France/Africa played
same way w/ paper clip, even thought it was culturally meaningless in
Africa
-difference in motor/cognitive development also influenced by floor freedom
-Americans tend to baby-proof their homes, so babies can explore world safely
-->not so in tropical areas where more dangers
-->less time spent exploring
-->less cognitive/motoric development over time
Vygotskian perspective
Vygotsky: babies develop through exploration:
-
Debate:
Piaget
Environment provides general context for child to develop
Information-processing theorists
Environment gives specific context for kids
-
Individual differences in infant cognitive skills
-there are tests to measure
individual differences in development and if they are significant to
future development
Examples:
Note: tests for younger kids focus on attention/sensorimotoric coordination
-->tests for older kids ar emore cognitive in nature
Study #1
-longitude test
Conclusion
-test scored do not correlate intelligence until about age 4
Study #2
Development tests do not reflect IQ
Conclusion
-Recently, researchers found other cognitive measures of infants that do reflect IQ
-->[correlation of 0.40]
Select items from Baylay scales of infant development | |
Age (and range) in months | Item |
0.1 | Responds to sound of bell |
3.1 (1-5) | Reaches for dangling ring |
5.4 (3-13) | Smiles at mirror image |
9.1 (6-14) | Responds to verbal request |
12.0 (8-18) | Turns pages of book |
16.7(13-21) | Builds tower of 3 cubes |
Bigger chart on P. 185 |
2 important points could be drawn:
-->no indication that the development is biologically fixed, but rather highly dependant on environment
Information processing
-How fast a kid habituates
to stimulus/processes perceptual info predicts info predicts IQ as late
as 11/12
Colombo: 2 infancy factors involved in IQ
Conclusion:
Traditional tests don’t predict IQ well.
Newer tests seem to predict better, i.e. info proceeding skills such as habituation and novelty (new things) preference
Advances and limitations
-Brain growth spurts: 3-4 months
-->reflects the developments
in the infants
[summery of chapter 5 on page 187-188]
Attachment theory
-Started w/ Bowlby (psychoanalyst)
à
Studied, based on the orphans that showed up in England after WWII
-Focused
on things like crying and movements as a form of attachments
-Ainsworth continued the studies àthe status of the stranger àb/w a year and a years and a half àthere is a correlation b/w connection w/ mom and fear of stranger àbetter relationship w/ mom, the less fear.
Chapter 6 –emotional development
Newborn =pre-adopted to social exchanges
-new babies are born w/ certain predispositions that help them participate in early social exchanges
à
provided that they get responsive
care-giving
-those predispositions preadapt the newborn to b/c social
à
but will only dev. w/I a certain context
Examples of preadopted predispositions
àpurely reflexiveànot intentional.
àas soon as they get a response, the
crying b/c a social signal
-infants notice events caused by their behaviors and repeat them.
àsometimes, those reactions are by caregiver [i.e. smiling]
àsometimes,
those contingencies preadapts kid to b/c part of a social system.
-attraction to faces [b/c of contrasting]
àduring feeding, bay close to mother’s face
àbabies also sensitive to human speech
àbuilt co-ordination b/w hearing and head movements
Example:
A – responded less quickly than B to cries of baby
à
but less hurried/automatic care that B
B - somewhat abrupt/fragmented
Result
-w/I 10 days: baby had more regular eating/sleeping habits under A’s care than B’s care
Origin of reciprocity
Reciprocity:
true social interaction involving mutual exchanges b/w partners/
Sensitive care: a care-giving style where the caregiver attends to the infant's needs and responds to them promptly and effectively.
Attunement: a
kind of 'sensitive care' where the caregiver's adjustment of the stimulation
that they provide in response to signs from the infant
-through countless hours of
interaction, parents b/c aware of moods/signals of baby and adjust their
behavior accordingly.
Example of dev. of communication:
-mom starts speaking/cuddling
baby when pause in sucking: eventually develops the turn taking of talking
-By 3/4 months: control of facial expressions; eye/head movements
-->baby starts to be selective of stimuli
-->when stimuli
to arousing, baby turns away to process it/reduce stimulation
-Reciprocity: learnt gradually. each step leads to the next.
-->gradually, more and
more active participation of kid in relationship = more advanced skills
of baby
'Becoming an active participant: the example of social smiling.'
-example of development of reciprocity:
-parents often attribute complex emotions to young infants, such as joy/anger/fear/surprise
-->very imp. for development
of relationship w/ kid
-technically, newborns only smile b/c of spontaneous electrical discharges in lower brain region.
-->at early infancy: only occurs while sleeping
Newborn Smiling
-takes place at sleep
-b/c of fluctuations around a critical threshold (see top of p. 200)
-facial muscles relax causing
a smile
-if mild stimulus is done (such
as a rattle), it might cause a gentle arausal in baby's brainwaves,
causing a smile, several seconds later (since the baby's response system
is still slow)
-but if the baby is aroused
in a startling way, the arousal level will shoot up and won't come down
the critical threshold for the smile, for quite some time (see p. 200)
-a few weeks later, a baby starts smiling during daytime as well.
-->adults are also programmed:
to misunderstand those smiles as intentional and meaningful. therefore
they react to the baby's smiles.
-->at 5 weeks, kids smile
at any gentle stimulation; but parents think that the baby is smiling
at mom's voice
-at 8-10 weeks, baby begins to smile at mom's face. (as well as anything else familiar)
-->b/c of 'recognitory assimilation'
'recognitory assimilation':
smiling at visual stimulus which is familiar and is associated w/ an
established scheme.
-->this time, the smile
is also caused by arousal fluctuations.
-seeing an object causes tension
which, when associated w/ a scheme, is relieved w/ a smile.
-by 3 months: baby can discriminate b/w familiar/unfamiliar faces
-by 4-5 months: can specifically recognize parents' faces and react aspecially to mom
-->at this point, baby stops smiling at strangers faces and only at mom's face.
-->at this point, the smile
is a truely social act
Summery: at first 6 months, an interaction b/w parent/child, partially on basis of baby's responses when they talk/play.
-->prompts the continuation/elaboration of relationship/development
Emotional development
-includes the emergence of various emotions and the development of emotional regulation
Forerunners of basic emotions
emotion =state
of feeling that arises when a person evaluates an event in a certain
way.
-i.e. when 8-months old baby places on the see-through crib, shows physiological/behavioral signs of fear
-->not so for baby who
did not learn how to crawl yet -->doesn't show those 'emotional'
responses.
-during 1st year, motions get increasingly differentiated and specified to certain events
-->during 1st 6 months,
reflexive behavior develops into forerunners of basic emotional behaviors
-from the beginning, babies seem to show basic emotions such as cries/sleep smiles.
-->they are reflexive responses to arousal levels in brain and not emotional signs
-->at first few week, baby show universal expressions of emotion, but they are fleeting and irregular, and not always easy to distinguish from each other/not clearly associated w/ any event
-->by 3 months, beginning of specific emotional signs
-->b/w/ 3-6 months: some emotion: wariness after inspection of unfamiliar face /frustration of not being able to do an established motoric act (i.e. grasping a toy)
-->by 10 months,
smile at something abstract -a specific face [and association w/ whom
it represents] -->not a mere physical stimulation!!! [-->true
emotion]
But those responses are not full-blown:
--
Beginning of emotional regulationand coping
-babies gradually getskills
to cope w/ emotioannly arrousing situations
Examples:
-babies -deep sleep after surgery
-->global and involuntary
-4-5 months - turn away from intense stimulus
-still universal and somewhat involuntary
-->5 months old will havea tough time turning from stranger staring at him
-->willlook back atstranger,and
eventuallystart cryings
crying - a way to interrupt
interaction w/ environment
Development in 2nd 6 months (7-12 months)
-increased organization -->especially revolving around caregiver
-->the element of purposefulness
-the changes are so dramatic,
that they could be considered qualitative
Example: babies hospitalized older than 7 months show negativity to hospital staff. then they need readjustment back to the home
-->not so for babies less than 7 months
Emotional development
1)clearly differentiated specific emotions emerge
2)emotional response b/c increasingly immediate, rather than requiring time to build up
3) all the classified expressions
of emotions begin to appear regularly
-by the end of 1styear, infant
can recall past experiences and anticipate consequences/outcomes
Emotional reactions to the unfamiliar
5 months =if stranger looks long enough (about 30 secs) the baby starts crying
7-10 months =reacts negatively even w/o prolonged inspection of them
-->called 'stranger
distress'
-Stranger distress lasts 2-3months
-->sometimes into 2nd year
-->varies greatly among
kids
-babies are not scared of just
any new unfamiliar thing
Example:
-if mom puts on a mask -delight
-if stranger puts on a mask -freight
-if then mom puts on the same
mask - freight
-->context is relevant
Context
-baby might smile @ stranger
from faraway, but distressed when stranger comes near and tries to lift
him
-->more rapidly the stranger approaches, the more fear
-->in home =less fear than in lab -->familiar surroundings
-->if care giver is close =less fear
-->if caregiver has a worried look =more fear
Conclusion
-by 10 months, infants can make evaluations about the threat of strangers/new situations
-->those evaluations depend on the environment
Emotional regulation/coping
emotional regulation =expands dramatically in 2nd 6 months of life
-->more subtle/flexible/serviceable
-coping techniques: as heartbeat increases -looks away to reduce heartbeat and relax. then baby relooks
-->see top of p.205
-that kind of baby doesn't cry
-->the ones who do usually doesn’t go through the relaxing technique
Emotional Coping technique
-purposefully signaling to
caregiver: calling/gesturing/stress signal/moving to caregiver when
threatened
-->unlike crying, this helps
baby stay in contact w/ environment and have organized behavior
Dyadic regulation = accomplished by both caregiver and infant -(regulation of emotion)
-->part of attachment
-at this point [late in first year] -not only more occurrence but also meaning of event
-->dev. of sophisticated skills to cope w/ emotional arousal
-->development of pathway b/w limbic and cortex regions of the brain
Foundations of attachment
Definition of Bonding: parents'
initial emotional tie to newborn; it occurs @ first hours after birth
Attachment: an enduring emotional tie between infant and caregiver
-security @ presence of parent
-distress w/ caregiver's separation
-joy w/ caregiver's reunion
Separation distress
-negative reaction of infants when caregivers temporary leaves
-->more common/happens faster in cultures where mom is constantly w/ kid
Greeting reaction
-positive reactions of infants
when the caregiver appears
Secure-base behavior
-behavior which baby uses caregiver as a base for exploration
-->looks back @ caregiver for security
-->goes back to caregiver if feels threatened
The base of attachment
-attachment is diff. from bonding
Attachment: 2
way relationship/develops over time
-early contact b/w parents helps but not essential to the relationship
-attachment doesn't have to be biological parent
-usually, infant attaches to
several people. i.e. both parents/siblings/kindergarten teacher/etc.
-human infants have hierarchy of attachments
->probably for survival
-->when being attached and
parent is not present, baby will go to someone else who is attached
Views on attachment:
1) psychoanalysts/learning theory: attachment is related to mom's feeding
2) Bonding: attachment is built into the human's natural selection
Harlow experiment
-2 fake monkeys.
1) made out of soft cloth. -no bottle
2) made out of wires -this
one had a bottle
Assumption: infant
monkeys are going to b/c attached to wired monkey since it had a bottle
(i.e. food)
Result: baby
monkeys attached to soft monkeys
Conclusion:
security interaction =is more important that food for attachment.
Approaches to explain difficulties
in attachment among children
1)Erikson: Psychosocial theory + Bowlby's attachment theory
-influenced by the quality
of care/variability in the security/infant-caregiver attachment
2)Ethological: genetic influence
Attachment framework
-except in extreme cases, infants b/c attached to a caregiver.
Generally, infants w/ problems such as retardedness/blind/physically disabled/abused
-->b/c attached, but slower
Example: the monkies in Harlow's experiment b/c punitive/rejecting as parents
-->though their babies stilled cringed to them
Bowlby's hypothesis
-attachment is dependant on quality of attachment.
-->w/ sensitive care, infants assume caregiver will be responsible
-after repeated times where caregiver relieved baby's stress, baby assumes it can rely on that adult for safety
-->Erikson called it 'trust'
-->bowlby called it secure
attachment
Patterns of attachment
Sensitive care hypothesis:
care in infancy has lasting effects.
Ainsworth: some attachments are 'secure' others are 'anxious'
Strange situation: mom enters w/baby to a playroom -->then mom leaves briefly
-->shows how well baby got
attached
-Anxious attachment is where the infant is not confident of the caregiver's availability and/or responsiveness
-->can't use caregiver as a secure base for exploration
Secure attachment
-associated w/ proper sensitive care
-60-70% of kids
-infant is confident in caregiver's responsiveness and availability
-uses the caregiver as a secure basis for exploration
-->they might be upset at separation, but they are happy at reunion.
Anxious-restraint
-associated w/ exaggerated maternal behavior/ineffective soothing
-infant is reluctant to separate from mom, but shows ambivalence to caregiver after when mom returns
-->i.e. baby shows that
he wants to be picked up, but then they try to avoid being picked up
Anxious-avoidant attachment:
-associated w/ unavailable or rejecting mom
-a type of anxious attachment in which the infant readily separates from caregiver and avoids contact after reunion
-not scared of strangers
-doesn't cry when mom leaves
-when she returns, he tries to avoid her @ all costs
-->not so w/ strangers
Disorganized attachment
-worst kind of attachment
à
no mold of attachment/relationships
à
often appears in poor neighborhoods
w/ much neglect and abuse
-associated w/ maltreatment/confusing mom behavior
-shows conflicting emotions
-showed conflicting events
of diff. kinds of attachment.
--
C*opy Chart
--
secure attachment
-readily explores toy
-affectively sharing of toys
-affiliative to strangers w/ caregiver's presence
-readily comforted when distressed [promoting a return to play]
-infant seeks interaction/contact after separation
-if distressed: seeks contact to relieve distress
-if not distressed: active greeting behavior: strong initiation of interaction
Anxious-resistant attachment
-shows poverty of exploration
-difficulty separating to explore -may need contact even prior to separation
-worry of new people/situations
-may mix contact seeking w/ resistance: hitting/kicking
-may continue to cry and fuss squirming/reject toy
-may be show passivity
Anxious-avoidant attachment
-independent exploration
-little affective sharing
-affiliate to stranger when caregiver is away -->little preference
-actively avoids mom after reunion
-->turns away/looks away/moves
away/ignores
-->may mix proximity w/ avoidance
-->avoidance is more extreme on the 2ns reunion
-->no avoidance of strangers
Disorganized/disoriented attachment
-infant shows inexplicable/conflicting behaviors that don't fit any category
Sequential contradictory: i.e. contented play interrupted by extreme anger
-Simultaneous contradictory:
fearful smile/approach and avoidance.
-baby might appear disorganized/disoriented
-may show slow/incomplete movements/stilling
-may show all mannerisms (stereotypies)
-->develops w/ threatening caregiver
Quality of care and security
of attachment
Approach #1 Look @ parent/infant interaction
i.e. earlier caregiver's interaction or sensitivity predicts child's attachment and later behavior
-->child's early behavior
does not predict future
Approach #2 study the effects of quality of care of attachment to assess abusive ot neglecting parent
-w/i first year, baby will cry less if promptly helped
-->crying is not reinforced
but is rather used as short signals to get prompt help
Sensitive care =not 'perfect' care but rather 'good enough'
Context of caregiver
secure attachment
=depends on kind of care that baby receives
3 big factors:
1)amount of stress in caregiver's life
2)social support available to caregiver
3)caregiver's own developmental history
Life-stress/social support
-easier to cope w/ daily problems/hassles w/ others are there to help
-people w/o help/support of others usually also have $ probs.
Parent's developmental history
-studies related to caregiver's perception of their own childhood to quality of infant/caregiver attachment
Mary Main
'adult attachment Interview'
-adults talk about attachment
related feelings/inconsistencies
=you can infer how much responsive
care they had/to what degree they have solved any feeling of mistreatment.
-->but sometimes, it is
hard to infer past, since adults might be infl. by current situation:
might lead the, to report their history negatively/describe relationship
w/ their infant poorly.
-some adults achieve emotional freedom despite insecure attachments
Monkey study
-monkey gives its baby physical
contact. the amount it gets =correlated to how much it gives its offspring
More than:
1)mom gave all offspring [genetic inclination]
2)mom gave younger offspring [observation]
Infant attachment
internal working model
-An infant's generalized expectation about the social world incl.:
1)caregiver responsiveness
2)the infants ability to obtain care (worthiness)
3) nature of social relationships
An infant who receives responsive care:
1)develops a model of a caregiver as available
2)self worthiness -worth of care +obtaining it
2) social relationships as
pleasurable and rewarding
-studies support Bowlby's theory that quality of attachments help shape child's internal working model of a social world
-->helps predict how well chilf will function later
-ethusiasm in solving problems/high self esteem/positive relationships w/ teachers -->strongly linked to quality of early attachments
The temperament framework
Temperament:
general style of behavior across contexts
Involves various behavioral characteristics:
-general activity level
-irritability
-proneness to distress
-reactivity
-inhibition
-early temperament focus on specific things, like crying
Alexander Thomas/Stella chess
3 Kinds of Babies:
easy/slow-to-warm-up/difficult
1)Easy: biological regularity/readily approaches new people/objects/highly adoptive/mostly positive mood
2)Slow-To-Warm-Up: mildly negative reactions to new experiences/adapt on after repeated exposure
3)Difficult:
biologically irregular/withdrew from new situations/intense negative
feelings/poor adaptability
Temperament: broadened to alse mean:
1) tendency to express certain emotions i.e.: wariness/proneness of distress
2)capacity to regulate one
own's behavior.
Infant characteristics, as measure by Thomas and Chess (1977) | |
Characteristic |
Description |
Activity |
General mobility,
as measured by frequency/tempo of motion, locomotion
àfrom ‘highly active’ to ‘inactive’ |
Rhythmically | Extent to which
sleeping/resting/eating àFrom ‘regular’ to ‘irregular’ |
Approach/withdrawal | How infant deals
w/ new situation/person/object.
àFrom ‘approach’ to ‘withdrawal’ |
Adaptability | Extend to which the initial withdrawal response gets modified over time |
Intensity | Intensivity of
reaction to internal states or environmental situations.
àFrom intense to mild |
Threshold | Strength of stimulus
needed to cause a child to respond.
->high threshold to low threshold |
Mood | Typical behavioral patterns related to quality of mood. àRanging from pleasant to unpleasant. |
Distractibility | Difficulty or ease which child’s ongoing activities can be interpreted as high or low |
Persistence of attention | Extent to which
a child remains engaged in an activity or returns to an activity after
interruption.
àfrom high to low. |
Stability of temperament
-early research based on parent’s
reports to measure baby’s temperament
Problems:
àearly research show little correlation b/w temperament and parent’s reporting
àa higher correlation is prenatal/postnatal
parental questions
--
-studies prove that babies have personal temperament, which remain stable over time
àonce temperament has stabilized, at around 12 months, accurate predictions of behavior could occur
Biology of temperament
-neuriphysiological/horomonal systems are affected by behavior
à
changes in those system reflect
behavior
i.e. Way babies: higher/more variant heart-rate/blood pressure
-more likely to show asymmetrical
electric activity in brain’s cerebral cortex
-higher level of Coristol (stress hormone)
è
parents report low adaptability/high emotional negativity.
Genetics of Temperament
-studies show: genetic component for temperament
-i.e. studies of identical twins
à
but other studies show identical
twins to behave like each others w/ time
Possibility: has to do w/ upbringing
à
but that has been proven to
be true for separately brought-up twins as well!!!!
Conclusion
Not clear how much genes vs. experience shape behavior
Temperament and attachment
Attachment: relationship b/w caregiver/baby
Temperament:
behavior across situations
-reaction in ‘strange situation’ =not purely based on temperament
à
some physiological difference!
à
diff. in reaction of diff.
parent.
Quality of attachment =organization of behavior w/ caregiver
Temperament behavior –behavior, regardless of person who is behaved to.
Securely attached infants
-can have a very diff. temperament
-some cuddy/cry often
-others cry little/very placid
àthe common denominator is that they have an effective relationship w/ caregiver
Anxious attached
-could also have diff. temperament
à
various ways to express insecurity
insecurity
= might be based on parental care, but the way to deal w/ it is temperament àoutwardly
angry/passive
*Temperament may help define what sensitive care is
Placid kid =frequent stimulation =sensitive care
Easily over-aroused kid =intense stimulation=insensitive care
Match/mismatch hypothesis
Anxious Attachment
è
combination of infant’s proneness to distress (temperament) and
caregiver’s need for sole control
à
clashing personalities
Some studies: temperament infl. Attachment
à
more irritability =more anxious/avoidant attachment
à
since it affects relationship, mostly in lower class.
Other cases if temperament infl. On attachment
-when baby’s characteristics taxes caregiver beyond coping.
-i.e. primitive baby =increases
chance of anxious-avoidant attachment
*Quality of care/temperament: converge around preschool age.
à
uncorrelated quality of care/temperament
until then
*general context is more important
than just parental care quality or just ‘temperament’
Example #1:
-mom’s ambivalence about parenthood
-kid’s crankiness
à
both intensify eachother
à
she might b/c truly hard kid b/c of this vicious cycle
à
temporary temperament b/c permanent
Example #2
-Kid is slow-to-warm-up
-mom=patient
à
kid develops skills of development
into new situations
Importance of early care
-Development –total =greater than sum
Sensitive peiod hypothesis
-the idea that certain kinds
of experience are especially important at a particular point in development
i.e. quality of attachment in infancy sets the stage for later relationships
à
makes a mold which is hard
to break out of
Studies:
-monkeys who grow up w/o parents but w/ peers
-fearfulness
-clinging
-monkeys who are isolated:
à
isolation during 1st
½ year is worse than 2nd ½ year of life
-even after extensive rehabilitation
à
still had ‘signature
stereotypies’
Signature stereotypies
=particular mannerisms developed as deprived infants)
-human’s problems are more
severe as their social life is more complex
cultural diversity/common humanity
-a lot of diversity/commonality
à
everyone agrees that the baby
needs responsive care
Example #1
Gusii of Kenya: physically respond to crying baby
U.S. moms: verbally respond to crying
Example #2
-Japanese mom: focuses on looking @ mom
-U.S. mom: focuses on looking
@ objects
Note: you have to be careful w/ cross-cultural diff.
à
many differences in understanding attachment:
i.e. Japanese kid might cry a lot when mom leaves
à
more than U.S. kid
à
but that is b/c they almost
never experience seperation
àshown by studies of diff culture w/ babies having attachment to various people (i.e. siblings)
àmom was still needed
*at first few months, emotions seem to be universal
à
by the end of first year, cultural
diff. seen to make a diff. on emotions
i.e. by 11 months, Chinese infants shown less emotional responsiveness to fear-inducing or frustrating experiences than Japanese/European/U.S.
->b/c that culture teaches to show emotional restraint
Enhancing the quality if early care
Study: early
daycare in itself doesn’t cause more anxious/avoidant but rather if
both parenting and day care are of poor quality
-poor quality day care led to negative emotions/hostility
à
non-compliance
Enhancing quality of care
2 approaches
àbaby is more likely to be securely attached
Conclusion
Early impact
-affects how children see world. Children experiences are not ‘remembered’, but rather set as a pattern of emotional/behavioral patterns.
à
change is possible –if ‘experience
(for better or for worse) was not extreme.
Class; mar 5, 2001
Early childhood
-defined as roughly 12-30/36
à
usage of symbols
à
symbolic distance –
à
language
-some think that that is the
biggest stage of development in kids
4 elements of language
-kids seem to pick it up naturally
Pragmatism: how you use the language: i.e. tone/choice of words/etc
Prelinguistic
-crying =first communication
-at around 2 months: -cooing
à
shows sartisfaction
à
basis of speech
à
based on satisfaction feeling of baby
àthe going back and forth of parent/child interaction which is the fore-runner of speech àgoing back and forth.
àdefines tones/volume/style of speech
Vocal play
-around 3-4 months
Cannonized babbling
-6 months
-random babbling that sound like speech
Conversational babbling
10 months
-in a style similar to speech
à
meaningless speech
Protowords
-sounds that don’t sound
like real words but have a consistent meaning -i.e. ‘ma’ =mom
chapter 7
Language –abstract
rule-governed system of arbitrary symbols that can be combined in countless
ways to communicate information.
Symbolic representation
-the use of ideas/images/other
symbols to stand for objects or events
5 elements of language
Phonology
-the system of sounds used in language
à
usage of stress/intonation
of words
i.e. the difference b/w ‘b’ and ‘p’: ‘bat’/ ‘pat’
à
some not used in each language. I.e. rolling ‘r’ of spanich/clicking sounds of African languages
à
not in English
Semantics: meaning of words/sentences
-logic
à
not grammar
à
i.e. ‘daddy is having a baby’
is semantically incorrect
Morphology
Combining units of meaning into more complex words
i.e.-un-speak-able
-3 morphemes
-each meaningful unit is called
a morpheme
Syntax
-Grammar rules:
i.e.
Girl kiss boy
≠
boy kiss girl
Girl boy kiss =incorrect syntax
Pragmatism
Productive/receptive
skills
Productive skills –put things into ideas
Receptive skills
–used to understand people
-parents might overestimate the kid’s skills, but they’re right to assume that receptive skills develop b/f productive skills
Example #1 young kids can tell the difference b/w l and w but won’t be able to pronounce the diff. clearly
à
receptive phonology is more
advanced than productive phonology
Example #2
-Kids understand words that are not yet in their active vocabulary
-kids understand more complex
sentences than they use
Major tasks in early language learning.
Learning the sound pattern of a language
Prelinguistic vocalization
-sounds produced by infants
during first year of life, b/f they begin to speak
5 stages of Prelinguistic vocalization
1)Crying
-happends reflexively when overly aroused
-->diff. kind of cries for
diff. kinds of arousal
2)Cooing
-@ around 2 months
-->expresses pleasure
-->also beginning of laughing/chuckling
3)Vocal play
-4 months
-babies play around w/ their range
-->vary their pitch/loudness
-->occasional simple syllable (i.e. ba/ga/ma)
4)Canonical babbling
-around 6 months
-strings of syllables
-->usually at first, it is a repetition of 1 syllable
-->then a sting of various syllables
-sounds increasingly like speech
-not yet use of syllables unique to that language
-->syllables used are quite universal at this stage (canonical
babbling)
5) conversational babbling/jargon
-around 10 months
-use of adult-like stress/intonation
Protowords
-appear around 10-12 months
-vocalization w/ consistent meaning for this child
-->but it still doesn't closely resemble adult's words
-early vocalization mistakes are observed cross-culturally
-'t' replaces 'k' sounds by accident
-->i.e. 'tat' instead of 'cat'
-->this mistake is also observed in German/Hindi
Learning words and their meanings
First word
-first identifiable word -around 1st birthday
-usually refer to familiar person (mama)/objects (ball/shoe)
-could also express feeling
(goodbye)/movement (up)
-compound words -->usually
not broken up
Referential style
-A style of early words use
in which words primarily refer to objects/events
Expressive style
A style of early word usage
that express social routine
Referential children
-learn words faster -->but no diff. in grammar
-usually from more educated family
-more likely to be firstborn
-->referential mom uses language to label things
-->Expressive mom uses language
to direct kid's behavior
Vocabulary growth
-at first, new words are acquired slowly
-by 18-19 months, an average of 50 words
-->18 months =vocabulary
spurt
-Referential kids-->until now -mostly nouns -->most noticeable vocabulary spurt
-Expressive kids:
equal proportion of nouns and other kinds of words
àrecent
estimates of 6 year old's vocabulary range b/w 8000-14,000
-Preschoolers appear to acquire 5.5 new words a way
10,000 by first grade
40,000 by end of first grade
-First words/vocabulary spurts
range differs culturally/socio-economically
Range:
-First word: 10-17 months
-Vocabulary spurt: 13-25 months
Process of Word Learning
-usage of word =b/f full grasp of word
-->very context-bound
-->w/ vocabulary spurt -words for 'categories' of words
-->early words disappear at vocabulary spurt
-->shows that it is not a true linguistic system
Study
-through intonation, baby could
make out words from continuous flow of talking
Segmentation
when toddler makes a mistake breaking up the words
i.e. 'readit
the book'
Fast-mapping
A process of using context cues to reasonably accurately guess the meaning of an unknown, new word
-->starts anywhere b/w 2-4 years
Joint attention
-the tendency of adult/language-learning toddler to share the same topic of attention
à
i.e. caregiver
speaks to kid about something he's already paying attention to
Study
by as early as 16 months, baby
can assume that the adults direction of gaze defines what he's labeling
Whole object assumption
-the infant's tendency to assume
that the new word related to an object, as opposed to an attribute/event/action
Lexical contrast
-infant's assumption that no
2 words mean the same
Errors in early word learning
i.e. telling the kid to:
-look at the ball
-look, it's red
-->the
kid assumes that those 2 unfamiliar words are diff. (BALL/RED)
Errors in early word learning
Under-extension
-language errors where the meaning attached to a wd is too restricted
à
i.e. thinking
that 'truck' only applies to toy trucks and not to real trucks
Overextension
-language errors where the attaches meaning is too wide
à
i.e. thinking
that 'truck' means any 4-wheeled vehicle
Study:
-more words in vocabulary =less
overextension
Note:
-when a word is overextended, the kid could be doing it intentionally,
since he has no other/better word
-->Receptive overextension
-i.e. when asked 'where’s the bus? Where’s the truck?'
-->the baby might be
able to tell the diff, even though he might not be able to express the
diff.
Common patterns of over/under-extensions
àunder-extensions
-->overextension
Morphological rules
Grammatical morpheme:
-'a unit if language that carries
little meaning by itself, but changes meaning of words/sentences in
a systematic way'
-->includes prefixes/suffixes/auxiliary verbs/etc.
-->i.e. adding 's' to make
word plural
English -->relatively few morphemes -->child only starts w/ them after combination of words into sentences
Turkish/Russian
-->more morphemes -->infants add grammatical morphemes earlier.
Order of Acquisition
Study
-morphemes are acquired in a certain order
-->though the speed of acquisition might be different
Order
1)first
- ...s (to make plural
- ...ing
2)later
...ed (passed tense verbs)
...s (3rd person singular)
3)last
...'s (to be - it's big/she's
nice)
Factors in order of acquisition
-->not frequency of usage
but rather other factors:
Factors include:
1)Grammatical complexity
-simplest changes in words are learnt first
-->words closest to active/declaritive form of word (i.e.'go')
2)Semantic complexity
...ing =simple form of an ongoing act
...s (3rd person singular) =more complex
-->we're talking about someone else in the singular persent!
3)Phonological characteristics of a morpheme
-i.e. Turkish kids learn morphemes faster b/c they have morphemes that are
-->Easier to notice
Productivity/over-regulation
Productivity
-children learn general rule of grammar (i.e. usage of ...ing/...ed)
-->not word by word
àProductivity of language (usage of
general rules)
Over-regulation
-application of general rules
of language incorrectly to exceptions
-by 6-7 years -almost fully correct
-school-age children sometimes over-regulate
à
i.e..
I brang lunch -->not 'I brought lunch'
-->those mistakes =not a regression but an emergemce of a ne wkind of thinking
-->'growth error'
Learning pattern
-Kids automatically search of regularities
-->over-regulation
fades out
Learning to form sentences
Syntax: language’s rules for organizing word sinto sentenxses
-->need to know form class
Form Class
-Category of words in a language that can fill a similar syntactic role in forming phrases/sentences
à
i.e. verbs/adjectives/nouns/etc.
-->only much later are they
able to explicitly relate to those grammatical rules
The one word stage
Holophase
-a word that conveys the meaning
of a whore phrase/sentence
i.e. if a baby says 'mama'
-->it could mean
First sentences
-18-24 months =first sentence
-->soon after, vocabulary spurt
-->but more related to verbs
-at first, 2 words =2 diff. ideas
à
i.e. ‘car,
daddy'
First true sentence
-usually composed of nouns/verbs/adjectives
à
at first, English speakers
usually don't add grammatical morphemes
Telegraphic speech
-speech omitting non-essential words
-->i.e. 'see teddy' -->could mean 'I see the teddy bear'
->still unclear
à
speech is still unclear ->parents
mostly reply on gestures/facial expressions
àeven
though parents model adult speech for toddlers, babies still start off
w/ telegraphic speech
CATEGORIES OF MEANING EXPRESSED AT THE TWO-WORD STAGE | |
Category of meaning | Description |
Identification | -Elaborations of pointing and labeling (i.e. ‘see doggie’) |
Location | -Words that signal
location, such as ‘here’/‘there’
ài.e.
‘doggie here’ -To express something is under something, babies juxapose words ài.e. ball [under] chair |
Recurrence | -to request repetition
à ‘more cookie’ |
Nonexistence | -when kids notice
that something that activity stops/an object disappears
à‘nomore milk’ |
Negation | -at about 2 years,
babies discover that they can contradict adults
àwhen shown a picture of a cow, they might say ‘no horsie’ à‘no milk’ when offered milk |
Possession | -at 1 word phase,
babies are able to point to something and say its owner
-at 2 word stage, they are able to juxtapose object and owner à‘baby chair’ |
Agent/object/action | -babies aren’t
able to express 3-term relationship (i.e. ‘daddy threw ball’).
àInstead, they might say: ‘daddy threw’ (agent action); ‘threw ball’ (action-object) or daddy ball (agent-object) |
Attribution | -babies start
to give attributions to objects
à‘red ball’ |
Question | -babies can turn
sentences into question by rising the intonation at end of sentence
à‘where kitty?’ |
Further syntactic development
-stages pointed out by
Brown (1973)
Stage # | Average # of morphemes | Description |
1 | 1à2 | -roughly at 2 word stage
-beginning of simple semantic/syntactic relations |
2 | 2à2.5 | -acquisition of basic grammatical
morphemes
ài.e. suffix ‘s’ to make plural |
3 | 2.5à3 | Simple sentences/questions.
ài.e. ‘where’s mommy?’ |
4 | 3à3.5 | -beginning to embed one clause
into another (i.e. subordinate clauses
à ‘I see what you made’ |
5 | 3.4à4 | -combine simple sentences
to make compound sentences
à ‘I have cake and daddy has candy’ |
Learning to use language socially
communicative competence
-the ability to carry on a conversation
-recognize and repair breakdown in communication
-uaw language in socially appropriate ways w/i a particular culture
-develops in infancy -->i.e. caregiver's turn-taking, as mentioned earlier
-by 1 year =turn-taking w/ conversational partner is well-established
-2 year-old will attempt to repair breakdown
-->understands where there is a lack of communication
i.e. -responding to adults' request for clarification
-restating requests that have not been fulfilled
-learning communication differs
cross-culturally.
Things that western families teach their kids:
-'don't mumble when you speak'
-in Japan, more politeness
phrases =more emphasis on teaching them to kid
The child and environment in language development
-in toddlership (which spans
roughly 1 1/2 years), development from few words to properly structures
language
Environmentalist theory
-stresses environmental factors
in language acquisition
Nativist theories
-stress the inborn, biologically
based factors in language acquisition.
Environmentalists:
Skinner
-parents condition kids to speak
-->attention of parents reinforce baby along each step of speech development\
-->eventually develops into speech
Problem:
observation shows that parents correct untrue more that grammatically
incorrect phrases
Nativists
Noam Chomsky
-the ability to combine so many/endless unique combinations of words can;t possibly be done through reinforcements
-->reinforcements/imitation
might help in speech learning but is not the reason for it.
LAD (Language acquisition device)
-innate capabilities to learn language
-->specialized are of brain
Problem:
no focus on other areas of communication
-->today, no developmental
psychologist is either-or!!!
Language acquisition
Humans: biologically pre-disposed to learn language
à
language is learnt w/ little
explicit teaching!
Hemisphere specialization
-the process of functions b/c specialized in specific areas on L/R side of Brain.
-->there is a critical point
to learning language!!!
Stages of development/neural development
8-9 months:
-long range connection in cerebral cortex begin to form
-adult-like metabolism
2nd year
-word spurt
-->sharp increase in synaptic density
-->increase in memory/info
processing
4 years
-grammar development is basically complete
-decrease of synaptic density/brain
metabolism
2nd language acquisition
Study
Chinese/Korean were taught English
-if taught b/f age 7 =fluency =also in grammar rules
-if taught after age 7 =decrease
in competence
=>perhaps 7 is the critical
point?
-speech is species-specific
to humans
Some seemingly inborn capabilities
Lab experiment: preference to speech w/ pauses @ phrases/clauses than w/i them!!!
-->built in pre-disposition to pay attention to perceptually salient stretches of speech
-i.e. stressed syllables/beginning of word
-->helps them key in on grammatical morphemes
-There is also a built in constraint (conclusions that could be drawn) in learning speech
-i.e. to seek out broad rules
-->nouns/verbs/adjectives
-->morphemes that reflect singular/plural
-->assuming specific meaning for unknown/new words
-Studies show correlation b/w cognitive development (i.e. symbolic representation) and language
Environment of language learning
-w/o exposure to language
kid's can't learn to speak
Child-directed speech (CDS)/motherese
-the modifications adults
make when speaking to young children
CDS characteristics
-->often includes questions about objects/events
-Fathers tend to speak to child diff. than mom
-->asks for more labels/explanations
(i.e. 'what's that'/'what does this do?')
-->uses more advance vocabulary
-->more breakdown of communication
w/ secondary care-giving father
Father: more likely to ignore utterance
à
Diff: probably
b/c father spends less time w/ kid
Sibling
-also adjusts their speech to toddler
Study:
even 2-3 year olds make their speech simpler for an infant sibling
Cross-cultural difference
-in some cultures, CDS doesn't take place
-->yet, the kids learn to speak at roughly the same time!!!
Study: 4 months
old babies prefer CDS to adult speech
Non-linguistic aspects of symbolic representation
-According to Piaget, the main
cognitive development of toddlership =emergency of symbolic thought
Piaget:
3 other non-language use of symbolic representation
1)Toddlers’ pretend play
Development of who the action is done on
-16 month-old will play-drink from a toy cup.
à
self-directed
-Later, he will pretend to ‘feed’ a doll w/ it.
-Other-directed
-by the end of the 2nd year, there is development of thematic play: building a block fence around animal toys
à
theme-directed
--
-With time, baby is able to
use decreasingly realistic objects to symbolize other things:
Steps of decrease of realistic symbols
Replica object
-14-19 months
- An object directly reflecting
the real object
i.e.
Substitute objects
-19-24 months
-substitute objects increasingly
used to represent an object
i.e.
Double substitution
-only appears later in preschool
i.e.
Note: when with a ‘pretending partner’ (i.e. parent or a sibling), the pretending is more complex, usually b/c:
2)Toddler’s Use of Gestures
-communicative gestures, such as pointing, usually appear at around 9 months
à
usually accompanied by some sort of vocalization
-conventional social gestures –appear b/w 9-12 months
à
i.e. nodding the head for a yes/waving bye-bye
-symbolic gesture –by 12-18 months
-i.e. putting thumb in mouth to represent a bottle
àearly symbolic gestures represent actions as opposed to features of object
-i.e.
use symbolic gesture to rep. bouncing movement as opposed to roundness
of ball
Coordination of gestures/visual signals
-12 months-old can’t follow id the adult is looking one way but pointing another
à
17-months-old can
à
18-months-old can point to one thing while looking at a person
à
Coordination b/w divergent
signs usually happens w/ first word
àvocabulary
starts to replace gestures àb/c dominant form of communication
Note: gesturing/vocabulary are 2 distinct, independent systems!
àdeaf kids develop/decline gesture at the same time as verbally communicative kids
àdeclines w/ sign-language growth spurt in deaf kids
àthe
deaf kids don’t mix their gestures w/ their signs!
Toddler’s understanding of Iconic symbols
-i.e. pictures/model scales
-9 months, babies are confused by pictures.
à
they try to understand what they portray
-20 months-olds do not show this confusion/manual exploration
à
they seem to understand that
the object portrayed is not really there
study
-when shown a picture of a room and where a toy is hidden in it:
àsimilar
results when shown the toy being hidden on a tv screen
à
This was different when 2 year
old kids where shown the toy being hidden through a window.
à
the difficulty for them must
be in connecting the symbol (picture/screen) w/ the real thing
Scale model of room
-2 ½ year-olds have difficulty finding a toy based on a scaled-down model of that room
-3-year-olds can
à
if convinced that the scaled-down
room is the same room, just shrunk down, the 2 ½ year old
kid will also be able to find toy (since he doesn’t have to think
of the scaled-down model as a symbol since that confuses him)
Note the
diff in terminology b/w infanthood and toddlership
Chapter 8
-As toddler gets older, the child not only moves to increasing self-reliance, but also gets socialized:
Socialization
Socialization:
-The process where the child
acquires rules/standards/values of the society
-at first, socialization only involves living up to parent’s expectations
à
w/ time, child begins to internalize these standards
à
to incorporate them into the self
à
this second step takes place
takes place in the preschool years and beyond
-Socialization in western culture tries to do 2 things:
-Socialization is different,
depending on the specific culture.
Two views of socialization
Socialization from the outside
Sublimation –Freud’s
term for the redirection of blocked biological drives and impulses
-Freud thought that as long as kid is not thwarted/overwhelmed by the anxiety/anger
à
then sublimation is a good
thing
-kid complies w/ those rules
to maintain closeness w/ parent who has been associated w/ food/basic
hunger
-kids gets punished for bad behavior/rewarded for good behavior
à
thus they learn to behave in
a way accepted by parents/society around him
Modern theorists
-less emphasis on direct learning
àsocialization from within!!!
àthe
kid sees behavior and internally categorizes good/bad based on perception
of the event
Socialization from the inside
Appropriation: the process of which children naturally take the rules of society through relationships w/ caregiver
-kids want to comply w/ parents’ requests and expectations
à
toddler enjoys pleasing his
parents
-Ainsworth’s research shows that most kids behave that way
-sometimes, kids are negativistic
à
very adamant about having their own way
à
sometimes called ‘terrible twos’
à
usually couples w/ move to
self-reliance (see erikson)
Erikson
-terrible two (adamant behavior) is usually coupled w/ move to self-reliance
à
the kid feels the want to exercise
his newfound skills/autonomy.
Ainsworth: kid has natural motivation to comply, as much as kid’s thrust towards independence
-when toddler constantly/consistently ignores/opposes his parents’ wishes, a problem could develop
à
this is not in the toddler’s nature
à
will be discussed later in
this chapter
Major Developments in the toddler period
-beyond socialization, there are other social/emotional developments in toddlership:
1)Moving towards independence
-in toddler period
à
marked decline in closeness w/ parents
à
mobile toddlers readily separate from caregiver to explore
-occasionally, toddler will return to caregiver, and return to exploration
à
but most contact will psychological: look/smile/exchange words
à
contact is no longer only physical
!!!!
-this skill of taking cues
across distance might lead to a cycle of making toddler increasingly
independent.
->shows that organization
of behavior regarding caregiver could remain consistent even though
behaviors may change (see box ‘Organization of Behavior’)
compared w/ infants, toddlers show:
-at the same time that toddlers b/c more comfortable w/ separation from caregiver, they show mastery over objects
ài.e.
actively experimenting w/ cause and effect ài.e. throwing a toy down the stairs
Executive competence: the child’s feeling that he is autonomous force in the world and has the ability to influences the outcome of events àthe feeling that they can do things for themselves
àthis feeling doesn’t only apply to objects but also to adults, i.e. using adults as props for problem-solving
-i.e. turning to them for assistance
Organization of behavior |
-It in not
only the actual behavior but rather the sequencing\combination\context
which is the most revealing about the child
Example -12 months olds approached strangers and even gave them toys àthat doesn’t mean that their aren’t weary of strangers
-a simple observation is not enough! You need to factors like:
Other study -18 month old let play in a playroom in 2 diff. situations:
-in case 2, the child is much less playful. Looks at mother often/vocalizes often to her -not the case w/ no screen àthere mere possibility of looking at mom encouraged the kid enough to continue playing Different behaviors w/I same issue study -babies monitored at 12 and 18 months: àthe ones labeled as secure (easily comforted w/ parent’s return) were also easily comforted at 18 months, though the comforting was different.
àdiff. behavior, but she same quality of behavioral organization
|
2)Growth of Sociability
-w/I toddler period –more
social interaction w/ adults/kids
-compared w/ infants, toddlers have expanded capacity to observe/interpret/imitate others’ actions as well as maintain a sequence of social interaction.
à
they seem interested in interacting
w/ others, especially w/ peers
Sharing experiences
-toddlers have a behavior characteristic: constant effort to share objects that they discover w/ others
Affective sharing –the Toddler’s sharing of positive emotions w/ caregiver
àtoddler won’t assume that the other person sees the object until he sees a response, such as a smile
àdirected almost exclusively
to attachment figures
Social referencing
Social referencing –taking cues from others, such as
facial expressions, in order to interpret novel situation
Study
-baby put on a glass 1 foot
off the ground àbaby didn’t know what to do. Experimenter
tells mo what facial expression to do. If mom smiles, he precedes. If
she has a frightened face, kid doesn’t precedes.
Note:
baby takes cues in the
ambiguous cases
Interaction Between Toddlers
-b/w. 15-24 month, the baby develops the ability to behave in a complementary way w/ a peer
àemergence of games (which are usually
rooted in imitation
-the game usually precedes w/ 1 toddler doing something àthe other imitates and then back and forth, they imitate each other.
à
much more positive emotions/complexity than infants are able to.
More complex playing w/ familiar playmate than w/ unfamiliar playmate
à2
year-olds can distinguish b/w playmates
-most of the interactions b/w young toddlers revolve around objects
ài.e. both toddlers play w/ the same set of blocks
àbut they rarely focus on same theme:
ài.e.
one builds a tower where one makes an unrelated road
-by 3 years, shared themes b/c more prominent.
-pretend play emerges (instead of solitary play) w/ interrelated roles:
-i.e. Dr. and patient
-foundations of friendships/peer relationships are laid down in toddler interaction as well as toddler-caregiver interactions that preceded them
àbut they aren’t able to form true friendships/continuing relationships w/ peers
àonly in preschool age do children show diff. b/w playmates and friends
àshow more reciprocity/positive emotions for friends than playmates
àalong
w/ that comes the concept of other people, their rights/intentions
Awareness of self and others
-self-awareness - emerges in
toddlers
-->i.e. if they can make
mental representations of themselves, they could also make mental representation
of themselves
study: by 20 months (sometimes as early as 18 months) babies can recognize themselves in the mirror
-->i.e. a red spot was put on their nose -->then they were shown in the mirror
-->if they reached directly
for their face ->they could understand that the thing they saw in
the mirror was themselves
3/4 of the 21-23 months babies
1/4 of 15-18 months babies
none of 9-12 babies
-there is a relationship b/w self-recognition and general cognitive development
-->i.e. Downs syndrome kids start touching face at diff. age, dep. on level of retardedness
-beginning of the use of word
'I'
Understanding of Others
Study:
-18/19 month old babies who prefer crackers to broccoli
-adult experimenter showed disliking face at crackers
-->the
baby knew to give the adult broccoli and not crackers
Dennie Wolff
: there are 3 stages in development of this understanding:
1) - at age 1, baby is able to recognize that it cant do everything, that others can
-->i.e. when playing peek-a-boo,
baby is surprised to see mom's face still covered when he uncovers his
face
2) -during 2nd year, baby understand boundary b/w their actions and others' actions
-->dev. of genuine turn-taking
-->in peek-a-boo, baby might
pull mom's hands off her face when playing peek-a-boo
3) -end of second year, child understands that each person is an independent agent
-->each person has a separate
role
-
i.e. in younger kids, they might jump out of hiding b/f they're found (blurred diff. b/w seeker and hider)
-->by age 2, the kid might
run in an opposite was as seeker comes near -->some knowledge of
people's roles/aims/intentions
-
i.e. kids might want to do more things by themselves: might start battles that will typify the 'terrible twos'
-->kid
increasingly realizes his 'own' abilities.
-awareness of self/others also leads to understanding of possession
-->child is less likely to grab an object from another person
-->more likely to negotiate for it.
-->more likely to return
object (i.e. toy) after a peer has been playing with it earlier
Emotional changes
Social-awareness helps Emotional dev.
more emotions regarding self-consciousness (i.e. shame
new level of relating
to other people -->emergence of social rules/standards
Feelings/social sensitivity/beginning of morality
-by middle of 2nd year -->sensitivity to social demands
-->i.e.
understanding that some things are foridden
-related to that is behavioral control:
i.e.
child may stop forbidden act/hesitate/restart/ and then stop
they may engage
in the forbidden behavior while looking at the caregiver
*Awareness of standards of behavior = hallmark of toddler period
-->stems from the ability to understand that things are not as they should be.
-
i.e. uncertainty/distress at a flawed object/external condition can't be met/can't do something as they're told to do
-->signs
of emergence of empathy: i.e. approaching those who are in pain.
-at this stage, emotions are still very primitive/undifferentiated.
-->i.e. same response
to parental disprovement as when performance standard not being met (i.e. peas roll off their fork)
-by the end of the second year
-toddlers respond diff. to diff. negative emotional signals.
Deviation anxiety
-toddler's distress over it
doing something forbidden
self-corrections
usually accompanied by words.
-->i.e. when kid goes
to a place forbidden by parens, he migth say 'no!, Can't!' as he leaves
-at this stage, all the standards are externally imposed by the adults
-adherence is almost always
dependant on adult presence
Changing emotions/New emotions
-during toddler period -some previously existing emotions are fundamentally changed
-->more organization of action during emotional arousal
-->i.e.
baby might laugh at an adult chasing him, yet continue running
-Awareness of other/self helps kid express direct feelings to others
->i.e. kid might show anger/joy at caregiver
might show deliberate opposition to caregiver when angered
hug caregiver even
when not upset: prototype of love
Important new toddler period emotions:
-feelings are still very fragile
1)Shame -an emotion in which the self feels exposed/vulnerable/bad
--> kid might feel the whole
self is dissolving -->especially w/ degrading/harsh punishment
2)Positive self-evaluation
-an emotion in toddlers that is the forerunner of pride
-->kid might feel a whole
encompassing sense of pleasure
-in preschool period, those
emotions will extend to standard that the kid himself has established
-another name for these emerging emotions:
Self-conscious emotions
Self-conscious emotions: emotions that require objective sense of self and some understanding of standards of behavior
-
'secondary emotions' -->qualitatively diff than the infant's feeling (joy/fear/anger/surprise)
i.e. embarrassment/shame
-->study:
kids who recognize themselves in the mirror: more liekly to show these emotions
Parent-Toddler relationship
Double role of parents during period
support child’s exploration of the world
set appropriate
limits for the child
-most developmentalists think that setting limits is just as important as providing encouragement to explore
àoften done verbally àcommands/comments/questions
àusually
starts at around 12-18 when the child has his vocabulary spurt
Scaffolding -the process in which the parents support
the child in new tasks by offering developmentally appropriate guidance/hints/advice
Guided self-regulation – the ability of toddler to regulate
their own behavior w/ guidance from caregiver
Asked in Class: what is the diff. b/w
scaffolding and
guided self-regulation? And how does it tie into temperament?
Answer
: cognitive/symbolic teaching that parents teach kids.
The self-regulation is a very general idea, that relates to any area
of life, like physiology/cognitive/etc.
Note: the important thing is the general approach towards child-rearing ànot specific practices
i.e. it doesn’t really matter when the child stops weaning/toilet-trained.
What does matter is the parental guidance consistency of limits
what parents do to foster a desirable behavior is at least important as what they do to discourage an undesirable behavior
process of socialization
from the inside (kid’s desire to comply from
the inside/to accept their values/standards) is facilitated by warm/supportive
family relationships
Changes in care-giving during the toddler period
-universally, the care of children
changes dramatically during toddler period
i.e. in many cultures, after infancy, as child
b/c mobile, other people, besides mom (i.e. friends/adult kid/sibling)
take an active role in toddler’s care/supervision
Example
-in western cultures, father much more involved in child’s rearing in toddler period
àmore
in play/challenging the kid than in care/nurture
Study
-study in Germany showed
that this challenge was directly related to kid’s later ability to cope w/ negative feelings
father’s increasing emotional support may make increasing psychological separation from mom easier
having 2 caregivers
w/ somewhat diff. Styles of interaction could be an advantage for the
kid
Individual adaptation: the roots of personality
-in toddler period, awareness of self leads to diff
patterns of adaptation
patterns of adaptation –the individual style
of responding to others and to the environment; which eventually forms
the root of personality.
-
i.e.
some toddlers might develop positive attitudes/expectations of the self
others will develop negative feelings negatively
some will show proficiency in handling emotions
others will be overwhelmed by them
-individual way of responding =
patterns of adaptation
Becoming a separate person
Separation-individuation process
-dev. by Margaret Mahler
-child’s psychological separation
from caregiver and growing awareness of being an individual
-as child moves from caregiver
and experiences doing things by himself , they increasingly understand
that their actions are separate from the caregivers’ actions and that
they are independent
-this process is not smooth for every child:
à
Erikson: when child’s sense of self begins to emerge and he is faced w/ parental limits, there is a potential develop either
sense of independence/competence
self-doubt/shame by parents
à
autonomy
vs. self doubt
-another factor affecting the smoothness of separation-individuation:
basic trust
when it’s strong: toddler can seek
autonomy and feel secure
Sander: describes the toddler’s balancing b/w autonomy and emotional support from parents:
-child does not seek exclusive self-reliance, but rather a balance of both self-reliance and emotional support of parents
if the toddler knows that the attachment relationship is secure: he will feel free to explore to the fullest
this confidence is product of child’s history of interaction w/ caregiver
àparent’s reliability during
infancy breeds a basic trust which later enables the toddler to make
initiatives towards independence
i.e. their bid for independence (and occasional running
into parental limitation) does not destroy their trust/relationship
w/ parent = healthy self-reliance
But: in less secure relationship w/ caregiver (
i.e. kid is anxious about caregiver’s availability), and when:
autonomy is being forced on them too early (under-protective)
independence is view negatively (overprotective)
àcompromises
self-reliance
Compromise of Self-reliance could be seen in:
power struggles
timidity
continued preoccupation w/ caregiver
angry interactions
lack of emotional interest in mastery
general emotional
detachment
Influence of parent-child relationship
Attachment History
-studies show a clear association
b/w quality infant-caregiver relationship and how well the child will
function as a toddler
study
-children’s attachment quality
to mother measured at 12/18 months and then again at 2 years.
-kids given 4 problems that require simple tools.
first 2 problems =easy
2
nd 2 problems = hard àbeyond capacity of almost all of the
2-year-olds
-mother present in all the
cases
Experimenters looked for:
Kid’s emotional response/enthusiasm/ability to face challenges w/o getting frustrated
Persistence/flexibility towards task
Child’s ability to call on mother when needed
Also measured timing/clarity
of mother’s cues/emotional support she showed
Results
2 year olds who have been securely attached as infants (and therefore confident in caregiver’s availability)
More positive emotions/less frustration
More persistent and flexible
Cooperated w/ mom to reach a solution
toddlers who had insecure attachment during infancy àmaladaptive responses
intermittently clingy/dependent
whiny/prone to tantrums
quick to get frustrated
quick to get into conflict w/ mother àproblem-solving goes into the background
no enthusiasm/pleasure in the problem-solving
ignore/refuse to act to mother’s clues
i.e. mom said: ‘get the block’
kid takes block
and puts in on the floor instead of on the board
Ongoing Parental support
-attachment didn’t
cause the diff. in toddlers
àattachment is only 1 factor
àanother is parent’s support/stimulation
during toddler period.
when caregivers are emotionally available/provide consistent/clear guidance
àtoddlers tend to be more eager/persistent/resourceful
Note: -b/c of parental consistency, its hard to
distinguish b/w effects of parenting on early parenting to that of later
parenting
i.e.
Parents of securely attached children –more likely to be supportive of toddlers in problem solving (such as those in the above experiment)
more adjustment of behavior to fit child’s scenario
let children proceed on their own until the end of their resources
then àincrease in clues
àthen direct help if necessary
if parent saw that frustration will take place àtook steps to avoid it
studies show that such anticipatory
behavior is more effective w/ toddlers than full-blown problems to arise
Parents of Anxious/Avoidant-attached children
Parents fail to increase help w/ struggle to solve problem
Remain uninvolved, regardless of the increase in difficulty of task
anxious-restraint parents: showed more help, but it b/c decreasingly appropriate/clear
àparent/child both b/c more
frustrated as pressure of the situation mounted
Generally: secure-attachment’s parents:
clear in the help that they give
unlike insecure children’s parents: no
clear guidelines
very clear in establishing limits
firm in maintaining them once
those limits are set
àdiff.
in caregiver behavior during toddler period àpredictive of the child’s later
functioning
How children affect their own adaptations
-some researchers: children’s inborn capabilities affect how parents behave towards them
such as:
seriously-ill kids
premature
born w/ drug addictions/other problems (stemming from mother’s use of drugs during pregnancy)
such children often show maladaptation as toddlers
-early neurological damage may contribute to those outcomes
àmay affect caregivers’ behaviors, which in turn affects kid’s behavior
àvicious cycle
àtherefore,
often the kid is negatively affected by caregivers’ behavior even
after the original problem has been treated
baby’s inborn tendencies
To what degree foes baby’s characteristics affect parent’s behavior towards it?
ànot clear!
-baby’s characteristics b/c
stable during toddler period
activity level
intensity of emotional responses
degree of boldness/inhibition
-more cohesion of behavior:
temperament gets
more correlated w/ security of attachment
attachment history and temperament
together give a more compete picture of child
organismic specificity- the phenomenon where kids of diff.
temperament characteristics respond diff. to same situation
-such diff. in toddlers’ responses can affect how parents behave to them:
kids perceived as agreeable/compliant -->caregiver: less limits/discipline
encourages further agreeable behavior
kids perceived as difficulty prompt harsh caregiving
negative cycle!!!
Forms of negative cycles:
kid who needs more support/consistent handling [perhaps b/c attachment issues] (when parents have more difficulty being consistent w/)
kid is detached when parents are increasingly distant:
cooperation less likely
Individual Adaptation and the broader Development Context
-the cycle of parent-child interaction is not in a vaccum!
-->surrounding context includes:
social environment: other adults/children
i.e.
-stress is usually bad for caregiver-child relationship
-->but
social support from others, such as extended family could alleviate
it.
Example: loss of job = stressor. A spouse’s emotional/practical
support w/ child helps.
Potential affect of stress on quality of care
-
alleviation of stressor: improvement of quality of attachment
-
application of stressor: regression of quality of attachment
Parental abuse and neglect of Toddlers
-parent might b/c frustrated w/ child’s exploration or might misunderstand child [as being intentionally naughty]
àpunish child too severely
-others, might find parenting
too overwhelming, give up and neglect child
àtoddler
has not yet learnt to avoid maltreatment or meet their own needs, making
them vulnerable to abuse/neglect
Problems related to child maltreatment
-hard to determine b/c there
are other associated factors such as family stress/poverty
-social withdrawal/aggression/other
social problems àcorrelates w/ maltreatment
Symptoms:
social withdrawal
aggression
low self-esteem
problems describing one own’s feelings/actions
emotional problems, such as: uncontrollable anger/inability to experience pleasure
apathy to challenges
difficulty balancing desire to explore w/ the need to feel secure
most problems go into adulthood
Forms of abuse
physical neglect
physical abuse
emotional unavailability
verbal abuse
sexual abuse
Physical neglect
-failure to meet child’s basic needs for food/warmth/cleanliness/medical attention
Physical abuse
-Deliberately causing a child physical injury
promotes
avoidant/disorganized attachment relationships
aggression w/ peers/lack of social sensitivity
blunted emotions
Emotional unavailability
-A
chronic lack of parental involvement/emotional responsiveness
Verbal abuse
-continually
criticizing/yelling/subjugating children to demeaning comments
Sexual abuse
-mistreating
a child in a sexual way
Searching for causes of Maltreatment
Characteristics of the child
-very little real evidence to show that the characteristics of the child is a major cause in abuse
àin some cases, a difficult child (i.e. seriously ill/hard to care for) may add to already overstressed parents, leading to maltreatment
àbut
here, the cause is the cumulative stress of parents ànot the kids nature
maltreated child could b/c a difficult child, b/c a vicious cycle
but the child’s behavior
is in effect is learnt behaviors àproducts of maltreatment
Characteristics of the parent
-vast majority of abusive parents suffer no psychotic disorder
no single personality trait that abusive parents share
àbur rather a broad set of adult’s
characteristics
Associated w/
low self esteem
poor impulse control
doubts about personal power
negative emotions
Study: new mothers (mostly single) -interviewed:
2 main diff b/w abusers and non-abusers:
àlead to more stress àthought that the kid is being intentionally hard àmore cases of abuse
-the mothers (in this study) who were abused as kids who didn’t b/c abusers were found to:
|
Environmental context
-while abuse happens w/I a
larger environmental contexts ànot only w/I parent-controlled environment
Likelihood increases w/:
poverty
social isolation
lack of education
In poverty families:
-abuse is more likely w/ stressors, like:
frequent household moves
job loss
serious illness
Social (environmental) context
-Society is a form of environmental influence
-in American culture, lots of violence in movies/TV/Books
àmore accepted as a tool for problem-solving/teaching
people lessons
-in cultures where violence
is not shown to that extent (i.e. Japanese/Native American) àchild
abuse is virtually unknown
-where the families lives as an extended family, (i.e. Natives) àmuch less abuse
àmore social support
àalso
true for poor neighborhood where group-solidarity is high àgreat
deal of community support!
Importance of toddler period
primitive sense of self
patterns of emotional regulation/expression emerge
toddlers
particularly vulnerable to family/cultural influence
beginning of major patterns of thought/feeling/behavior, as learnt from interaction w/ people
supportive relationship w/ caregiver àself-worth/empathic members of society
abusive relationship w/ caregiver
->feeling of self-worthlessness/indifferent to social relationships
Note: we have the ability to change the disposition set
on us during toddler period later in life!
Children
don’t cause to be maltreated
-aggressive toddlers doesn’t predict future behavior àaggressive
parents does future kid aggression. Question: -then, why do abused kids also
get punished by teachers/get abused in foster care? Answer: -B/c they’ve learnt to be the victims of any care-giving relationship àthis behavior didn’t start the maltreatment,
but was rather developed from it Another factor: -in the case that father abuses mother -child learns to imitate parents and also b/c abusive |
| Factors that increase risk of abuse |
| |
| Long-term
vulnerability factors
|
| Long-term
protective factors
|
| Current
challenges:
|
| Short
term buffers
|
Class –mar 26, 2001 -Baby is usually taught what not to do b/f he’s taught what to do -by 5-7 àclear expectation of kids -western culture relatively
encourages independence of the kid -kid still needs parent’s
emotional support, even though he becomes physically independent (as
well as somewhat emotionally independent) -Kid will separate more easily if:
àkid might say ‘bye-bye’
-executive competence àthe
baby’s feeling of ability/mastery to do whatever he possibly can conceive
of doing -increase of social life àqualitatively diff. than the 1 year old’s social relationships, b/c of newly acquired language skills àlonger play-times/games -at that age, kid likes affective sharing àshares almost everything/experience/emotion
w/ parent -learning of social rules;
i.e. looking at the person that you’re speaking to
2nd year -usage of the word I/me at age 24/26 months àinternal state talk àwhat I feel inside àthings that I can’t really see -i.e.:
-‘good/bad/want/happy’ -sees others as actors ànot as initiators àcan’t picture others also having
feelings -I have to do things in order
to prompt others do react a certain way -by end of 2nd year, the baby starts to understand that the others has his ‘own sense of action’ àothers also have a ‘self’ àthey
also ‘feel’ -most fights during terrible
twos is when parents’ don’t respect the independence that the parents
gave the kid -by 2 years àthe kid will grab the toy less that a 1½ year old kid àrespect of other’s self |
Chapter 9
preschool/early childhood
-early childhood: 2½ -5 years old
-->
preschool
Characteristics of the preschool period:
Asks many questions; because:
lack of info
simplistic thinking
emergence of mental representation
can think of things that aren’t there
consequence of things w/o carrying them out
Attempt to understand world
more advances linguistics that the simple sentences of toddlers
beginning of active participation in development
interplay b/w child’s development capacity and environment
playing grocery-shopping w/ friend who plays the grocer enhances script for shopping, which in return helps general social abilities
but still , over-regulation (just like toddlers
-->i.e.: airplane ‘
goes
’
Centrism: the tendency to consider only 1 piece of info when multiple pieces apply
i.e. kid can consider
only the cart ahead but not cars beside
Appearance-reality problem: tendency to define reality by surface appearances
i.e. when a colored
filter covers an object, the kid doesn’t realize that the filter
is shading the obj. a diff color, but is really the original color
Egocentrism: Inability to take perspective of another
person
Preoperational period
-
Piaget theory: ages 2-7
Characterized by lack ability to use of logical operations
-->yet they can reason beyond Sensorimotor world of infancy
-->lack of logical consistency
i.e. mental representation
-->yet
lack of logical consistency
Reasoning about causation
Piaget: asked kids about how clouds move
Level 1
-External superficial appearance
i.e. in movement: close obj. seem to move; yet far obj. don’t.
assumption of child: they must be moving
w/ me!
Level 2
-Omnipotent power: God/parent control objects/events
Level 3
-some usage of natural phenomenon, but still quite creative/improbably:
i.e. ‘sun’s rays move
the clouds’
Level 4
-Beginning of adult reasoning
-->but not quite as complex
See page 308-9 for examples of the levels
Debate about mature reasoning
Piaget: mature reasoning about causation –only in middle childhood
Other studies: depends on the complexity/familiarity
-->the
more simple/familiar to the kid = the more mature explanation he will
give
Note: children lack an abstract idea of what seems
plausible -->fanciful explanations
-acquiring specific causes
=gives foundation for development of abstract reasoning.
-the more mature explanation
= abstract concept of plausible cause
Reasoning about living/non-living
Animism: Piaget:
tendency of young children to attribute life to non-living things
Piaget thought that kids thought that anything that moved =alive
-i.e. bike/cloud
later research: child knows that not all movement=alive
-->the kid just doesn’t know where to draw the line
later research:
A child as young as 3 understands that animals move by themselves and nonliving things move as a result of external forces, incl. human intervention.
By age 4:
realization that living things grow and non-living things don’t
non-living things get worn/living
things don’t
but still, the child doesn’t have a full understanding of implication of diff. b/w living/non-living. I.e.
-->fruit-fly will die if kept in airtight jar
-->animal’s seasonal color change
Reasoning about quantity
-appearance-reality problem/lack of memory are the biggest barriers
beginning of the concept of
conservation
Conservation: the idea that an amount of something remains
the same despite changes in its form/shape/appearance
Concepts of conservation include:
Conservation of liquid volume: total amount of liquid remains the same despite being poured into diff. containers
Conservation of number: the quantity of items remain the same, despite repositioning
Conservation of mass: the mass remains the
same, regardless of shape:
i.e.. whether you make the clay into a ball or a block.
Conservation of length:
length of something remains the same whether it is straight/bent/
Note:
Child don’t acquire all of them at once
Depends on environment:
Mature understanding
of them doesn’t emerge until middle childhood
Conservation of liquid
Piaget’s famous experiment:
-take 2 equally shaped cups. Fill them w/ equal amount of water.
when asked, kids would say that they have an equal amount of water
àthen, pour water from 1 cup into a longer/narrower cup
younger kids don’t realize that there is
same amount of water, despite the appearance of the water to rise
à
appearance-reality
problem!.
Stage 1
–ages 3-4
-the children are ‘
non-conservers’
-children
judge volume by height
Stage 2
–ages 5-6
-
transitional period
-kids are less decisive about which has more liquid
àthey wonder if height/width makes a diff.
àusage of some reasoning: i.e. ‘when you pour the water back, it is the same volume! ’
àthey try to find a consistent answer
àthey are not sure about themselves
Stage 3
–age 7
-
mature conservation
àthey answer swiftly and correctly
-they state the younger kids (who answered
incorrectly) are ‘dumb’
àage
7 àbeginning
of middle childhood
Mature conservation answers included:
Compensation
‘This one is higher, but narrower, and that one is shorter but wider, so they are both the same
Reversibility
‘when you pour it back, it’ll be the same again’
Identity
‘it’s still the same water’
nothing was added or subtracted:
‘you only poured it into
a diff. glass’
study –
Brenner
case: screening the containers so that the kid won’t see the cups and have an
appearance-reality problem.
-this made a diff in stage
2, where the kids almost had all the skills to solve this problem, and
this pushed them over the last hump
-older preschoolers/young elementary-schoolers could be taught to solve a problem using combined skills àthe have learnt to coordinate the acquired cognitive skills
àyounger ones can’t
Concept of numbers
-progresses incredibly in preschool
years
awareness on number of items
present:
i.e. how subtraction/addition/rearrangem
Study
-2 row of 7 coins spread equally
àkid agrees they are equal in #
àthen
# is spread out àpreschoolers make an
appearance-reality
problem mistake, claiming the longer row has more coins
Note: in 4 year olds: conservation of # task is
successfun in cases of small # of items, such as 2 or 3
Understanding the effects of addition/subtraction
-some studies show that preschoolers
have some knowledge of addition/subtration using small numbers
Study
-Gelman
2 plates
1 w/ a row of 2 mice
other w/ a row of 3 mice -examiner tells kids that the
plate w/ 3 mice is the winner
àbut didn’t specify whether b/w length
of row or the # of mice
àwhen
shuffled, the kids were supposed to say whether a place is a winner
plate or not
àthen
altered the row length/number -study showed that even 3-4
year olds define winner by # and not by length
àkids couldn’t see
the 3-mouse plate (that had 2 since one was removed) as a winner.
They said that one mouse would have to be added to make it a winner
plate
Study -
cooper
-showed that 2-7 year olds
had some basic rule:
subtraction decreases
#/addition increases # -kids was shown 2 group of
objects.
Equal in size
Differed by 1
Differed by 2
The experimenter then adds
or subtracts an obj.
Results:
Stage 1
2-3 year olds
-ignored initial # of objects,
but rather said that the one whose item had been removed has less/been
added had more à
Primitive rule: a rule that lacks sophistication
Stage 2
-4-5 year olds
-used
qualitative rule
àtook into account the quality of the
initial group, but not the #
ài.e.
if the first 2 groups had 5/7, then when adding one to the 5 group,
the 4-5 year old thought they were same length
àtook
into account the length [to some degree] but not #
Stage 3
-6-7 year olds
-
quantitative rule –took account magnitude of any diff.
in the initial groups àthose
3 stages related to Piaget’s conservation of # theory
àsupports Piaget’s
theory that number conservation is related to general # understanding
àonce you’ve mastered
# conservation, you’ve reached Piaget’s
stage 3
Problem
àbut
many studies show that’s begin process of acquisition of # earlier,
and that this process lasts longer than Piaget thought
Learning to count
-begins in early preschool
-helped by TV programs such
as
Sesame Street. -by early childhood, kid can
count to 5 or 6 accurately
àbut they still make some odd mistakes
Example of odd mistake
-one kid seemed to be counting
the fingers of his hand. Then, holding the experimenter’s index finger,
the kid said it was 4 (i.e. he was giving fingers names àhe
couldn’t see numbers beyond the fingers)
5 principles in learning to count
As identified by: Gelman/Gallistel
One-to-one principle
Associating
an obj. of the set w/ one and only 1 # name
i.e. 2-3 year olds have difficulty w/ this counting
more than 3 or 4 objects
try to keep track by pointing
count faster than the fingers go, and therefore might:
count same object
more than once
skip objects
that are not in a row.
Stable-order principle
that
numbers go in a certain name order
àlack of full understanding
of this could lead to things like leaving out a specific number name
when counting, such as ‘seven’ -young
children have a stable-order until 3
àstable-order
expands during preschool period.
Cross-culture:
in some cultures, where # names
relate to body parts
they will learn
early number names faster, but will learn abstract number skills later
in others, numbers w/ decimals
are said ‘ten-one’ instead of ‘eleven’
develops abstract
number skills earlier
Cardinal principle
The understanding
that the final number of the set is the
total # of objects
-i.e. when asked how many
objects are present, will count to four and only then say that there
are 4 obj.
Karen Wynn: kids master this by around 3
½
à3 year-olds can master
it w/ 2 or 3 objects but no more àsometimes 4
Study:
cardinal principle is even more apparent at age 4
-4 year old might miscount
intentionally in order to make their counting consistent w/ their judgment
that one row is longer than another
àthis
phenomenon only makes sense, if we assume that they understand the cardinal
principle
Abstraction theory
The idea
that any set of objects are countable
I.e. the kid is willing to
count anything, real or imaginary, or even be willing to count a set
w/ totally diff. categories of things. (i.e. animate/inanimate obj.)
Order-irrelevant principle
the realization
that it doesn’t really matter in what
order you count the objects
-i.e. if kid asked to count
a set of obj. more than once, he might will count them in diff orders
àBy age 5, a kid is explicitly
able to state that order is irrelevant àby
end of pre-school period, the kid has understanding of these 5 principles
abd use them appropriately
Concept of measurement
-Piaget thought that conservation
was required to understand measurement
Problem: kids have intuitive grasp of measurement
b/f the correctly solve conservation problems
Other studies show:
Preschoolers would cut a string
in ½ by folding in the middle
Divide many cookies in 2 by separating them, a pair
at a time
Nevertheless:
-kids will still make mistakes
in comparing 2 apparently diff. measurements.
ài.e. same amount of water in 2 differently
shaped cups
àbut
w/o this distraction, they could do reasonably well on simple tasks. but their concept
of measurement is still simple, like addition/subtraction
àit
still seems
qualitative
àthey
are able to measure relative size (which has more than
another) àbut,
they are not able to combine it w/ their counting skills to arrive at
a precise, truly quantitative measurement àthey still don’t have a grasp of
abstract measurement units, such as inches/meters
Summery
preschoolers usually
don’t show an understanding
of quantities that are conserves, despite changes in appearance, since
they focus on 1 stimulus
usually the height of the container/length
of row
Teaching could lead to a stable cognitive skill, but not b/f kid has cognitive framework
to which this skill can fit into
Preschoolers show
considerable sophistication in reasoning in small numbers
Preschoolers’ quantitative reasoning
is immature, but is not random: they follow rules in solving quantitative
problems àit
is merely the nature of their rules that change.
Reasoning about Classes and Logical Relations
-Piaget focused on 3 skills
of preschooler’s emerging logical skills:
Classification: the ability to group
things by shared characteristics, such as size/shape
Seriation: the ability to arrange
things into a logical progression, such as suze or shape
Transitive Inference: the ability to infer
the relationship b/w 2 objects by knowing their respective relationship
to a third object. -Piaget seemed to underestimated
their skills ànew
studies show more complete picture:
àthese above skills are
hampered by appearance-reality problems and memory limitations
Classification
The child is starting to put
things into
classes
Class: any event/obj. that is treated in the same way
b/c they have features are the same.
Question:
-When do kids start classifying?
Answer
Piaget
-Gives kids toys of 2 shapes
(circle/squares)/2 colors (red/blue)
-
conclusion: younger preschoolers
sometimes: divide obj. by 1 dimension: by color
or shape
àsome sorting mistakes,
i.e. 3 year-olds would sort by color; then they would switch and sort
by dimension the last object [according to the previous obj.]
Later studies
-2-dimensional classification
could be improved in kids w/ training
Note: when given explicit rules in sorting things, they
show the same limitations that Piaget notes, but are able to consistently
sort along 1 dimension at an
earlier stage
Some studies show:
Age 2 ½: can tell what simple category a picture
goes into: i.e. is it a bird or a cat?
àthen, if given an explicit
rule of sorting: ‘put bird pictures here/cat pictures there’: they
sort
randomly
àeven after reinforcement/helping
Age 3: can follow rules consistently, but will have problems
switching from one to another rule (i.e. sorting color, and then sorting
shapes)
Age 4: can switch rules w/ no problem
Seriation
Piaget: seriation shows a cognitive skill required to appreciate #/measurement
àasks kids to arrange sticks in order
of shortest to longest
if the kid succeeded, he was given
a stick of equal length to a present stick and asked to put it into
appropriate order Early preschoolers:
could find smallest/largest but not those in the middle
By age 6 or 7, most
children could find the correct place easily and construct a series
as well as inserting the additional stick into already present series.
Adult thinking
-put the smallest stick at
one and of the array and continue from there.
Preschool thinking
-
trial and error – put the sticks randomly and only then
chick to see if they’re put correctly.
àthey is why they correctly could deal
w/ this task w/ only 3 or 4 sticks
Note: Preschoolers must
see the whole array to know if it is right or not à
centrationp -See left of p. 319
Order of stick study development
Young preschoolers: put sticks randomly
Older preschoolers: put the sticks w/
their tops higher than the previous one regardless of their bottom length
(actual length
B/w 5-7 the kid is able get
is right
Note: The older mistakes make the centration mistake:
they are only able to focus on 1 factor: the top end of the stick and
not the whole stick
Transitive inference
If a=b and b=c
Then, transitive inference
says that a=c If Mickey is taller
than Bryan, and Bryan is taller than Justin, than transitive inference
says that Mickey is tallest of the 3
Piaget: kids don’t know this until middle childhood
Other studies: kids acquire this earlier
Study:
Trabasso
-Even 4 year olds can solve
these kinds of problems, if they remember the conditions
Example:
-Trabasco teaches 4 year-olds
to remember 5 premises: (i.e. Mickey is taller than Bryan. Bryan is
taller than Justin.)
àand then asked them
‘who’s tallest?’
Note: -much harder for preschoolers than school-age kids
b/c of the memory demands as well as the difficulty of coordination
of info for multiple-premise pairs
Distinguishing b/w appearance and reality
-as mentioned, kids have hard
time distinguishing b/w appearance and reality
-some studies focus solely
on child’s understanding of appearance-reality distinction
Study:
-a family cat was put on a
dog mask. Kid asked: what animal is it?/what does it eat?/etc..
3 year olds: frequently thought that the mask changed
the identity of the animal
5/6 year-olds: didn’t change the real identity of animal
Study #2
-Child shown object which appears
diff:
-i.e.
sponge which looks like rock/
obj. colored by a filter
results: 3 year olds are not able to see beyond
appearance, regardless of culture and how their mother tongue phrases
question
àsince this study was done on both American/Chinese
students
Other studies show:
-kid as young as 2½ sees a
cockroach removed from orange juice. When asked, he said that the juice
is still not drinkable
-3 year-old uses the word
real to distinguish b/w toys and real objs that they represents.
Conclusion:
-even though children are starting
to distinguish b/w reality and appearance, in the beginning, their judgment
is dominated by appearance. Only later in childhood does it b/c more
reality based
Sensory register: the area of memory where incoming sensory
info from the 5 senses are stored, very briefly.
Short-term/working memory: the part of memory where consciously
noted info is stored for 10-20 seconds
Long-term-memory: the part of memory where memory is stored
for a long time
Attention skills: the processes that control transfer
of info from
sensory register to
working memory.
Memory skills: processes that retain info in
working
memory and/or transfer it to
long-term memory. -Attention skills/memory skills
have a central role in cognitive development, as seen in chapter 5
Deploying attention
-preschoolers have problem
choosing what stimuli to focus on.
Study -
Vurpillot
-shows children pictures of
pair of houses. Some pairs are identical houses; some have diff. windows
(see p. 322)
preschoolers’ eyes were filmed to track
movement àto
see what they focus on
made more mistakes than older
kids b/c they did not use systematic tracking techniques, and therefore
missed some of the important info, like some of the windows
Other study by
Vurpillot
-kids scan more than they have
to
i.e.: 12 windows: 6 w/ objects/animals
àkids asked to remember only the ones
w/ animals
àthey
could have any amount of reopening the windows until they remembered
all the ones w/ the animals (as opposed to the objects)
àthey
kept opening them randomly ànot only the ones w/ animals àUnlike older children
conclusion: children didn’t organize their attentive
behavior efficiently -preschoolers lack understanding
of nature of attention
àlack skills to maintain attention/shut
off distraction -i.e. 2-4 year olds, watching
‘sesame street’ –won’t only watch it but do many other concurrent
things -Preschoolers only begin to
understand the nature of attention
àonly by middle school to they deploy
attention selectively.
Preschooler’s memory
young preschoolers,
don’t see the need to remember
things, but get devastated when they forget things
by the end of preschool
years, they are able to remember , but are not very good at generating
a plan to facilitate remember.
Abilities and limitations
Recognition memory: the ability to perceive a particular
stimulus as familiar
Free recall: the ability to spontaneously pull info out
of long-term memory Sometimes, preschooler’s recognition/recall skills
are quite impressive
I.e. 3 year old who remembers a wide array of construction
vehicles
àstudies
show their ability to absorb a tremendous amount of info
Autobiographical memory
-During preschool
àdirt memory of oneself is around 3½
/4 -within lab setting, kids do
better in recognition/memory games than on verbal games
ài.e. ‘
concentration’/ ‘
memory’
àB/c
their visual/spatial skills are beteryam verbal memory skills -they still perform poorer
than older children/adults when asked to recall things like pictures/#
i.e. in a study of remembering digits of increasingly
lengthy numbers (incr. # of digits)
Preschoolers: 4
digit
6-8 year olds: 5
9-12 year-olds:
6
College age: 8
Possible explanations:
Improvement of short-term
memory b/c of the increasing speed of info.
The kids are less
familiar w/ numbers – harder for them to develop
memory strategies
Note: when asked something familiar to the, i.e.
cartoon faces that they have seen the previous day, they remember as
well as older children and even adults!
But! When specifically asked to remember something,
the older children/adults remembered better, since they have better
remembering techniques
àin
previous case, it was merely passive memory. Now, it’s active memory
Early memory techniques
-preschool children actually
do use some memory techniques
asked to remember
which container the toy was placed under
put hand on container to remember
kept staring at right container to remember
3 year-old asked
to find a recently used camera
look at where they have
last seen it
the look at other places they’ve
seen it.
3½ year-olds seek first where
the camera was used
àlogical
constraints on where it might be ànot just where they have ever seen
it.
Note: when kid looks for a lost object, it is exception
rather than the rule; usually they are susceptible to adult suggestion
àthat is why in courts,
their witness is sometimes problematic as they might be saying something
they think is true, but has really been suggested by the interrogator -b/f 5, kids don’t intentionally
go over info to encourage retention
-initially, preschooler’s
memory techniques are:
Context-bound
Limited
Inconsistent
Encouraging improved performance
-kid might know that memory-improvement
skill is present but won’t know how to use it
àparent’s help might help develop
it. ài.e.
reading out loud repeatedly will encourage the kid to review.
ài.e. see
vygotsky, above
Social cognition
-Improvements in memory skills
and other aspects of thinking impacts kids social world
Social cognition: a child’s understanding of the social
world Preschooler learns:
other’s thoughts and intentions
what they’re likely ot do
that people differ
in their opinion to one’s opinion
realization of all of this
helps kid communicate, which in turn further helps child cognitive/social
growth.
Egocentrism in Preschoolers
Piaget
: preschoolers’ characterized by egocentrism -in reality, egocentrism is
in all parts of development: it is merely more obvious in preschoolers.
Example:
-4 year-old put finger in her
ears and asked her dad: can you hear me. When he said no, she raised
her voice and asked again
2 levels of egocentrism in this story:
The kid though it
was going to be hard
for her dad to hear if she put her fingers in
her ears
Perceptual egocentrism
By her dad saying no, that implied
he must have heard her; but she didn’t consider his reality
Cognitive egocentrism
Piaget:
-3mountain task
-child shown picture of 3 mountains
from atop. Then showed 3 pictures from sideways. The kid was supposed
to tell which of those represents the former mountain he saw. (see bottom
of p. 326)
-->only
by age 9/10, did the kids see right picture -->but this egocentrism
is not complete: if kid is shown a block that’s red on one side and
white on the other. When he sees the red, he does understand that on
the other side
study: kid sees cookies hidden in a crayon box.
When the 2
nd child enters, the 1
st child is asked what the 2
nd kid
thinks is in the box. He answers ‘cookies’ as opposed to crayons
-->can’r
see the other one’s perspective. -->
appearance-reality: what we saw
must be reality
study -
flavell
-kid can’t imagine other’s
wishes
-->3 year old who’s asked
to select a gift for their parents will give a toy that the kid likes.
-->sees
reality through his eyes.(egocentrism) -->but nevertheless, there
is a gradual progress: 3 and 4 year olds are aware of adults’ wishes
-->they just have a hard time differentiating their wishes from adult’s
wishes 4 year olds more
egocentric to teacher than to parent
they knew better what parent
buys to themselves than what teachers do
5 year olds: 50%
buy appropriate gifts for everyone on their list
6 year olds buy
appropriate gifts for everyone
begin to see other person’s
perspective
begin to realize that their
perspective/desires are not the other’s desires
Flavall: factors needed to overcome egocentrism
knowledge of existence
knowing that other’s perspectives
are diff. from theirs
Awareness of need
realizing that taking others’
perspective seriously, since it has social benefits
social ben
efit
the ability to read other’s
actions and imagine their perspective -in toddler period, baby is
able to understand only basic facial expressions of mom
-by 4, he is able to categorize
it into good/bad
-in early preschool, when this
ability is emerging, it is still very basic, and is not always used
-->even adults have trouble
deducing facial
The child’s theory of the mind
-child is not only developing
understanding of physical world, but also concepts of knowing/wanting/thinking
Theory of the mind: an understanding of the mind and mental
operations
àpart
of the term includes ‘theory’ b/c it is not only the kid’s empirical
observation of the physical world, but also theoretical constructs that
help the kid construct the world around him
John Flavall: stages of development of the theory of the mind
1) the understanding that
minds exist -during
toddler period, kids can understand mental states, such as feelings/desires
àwhich
tells us that by that age, they can understand that the mind exists àthis stage is established b/f preschool
years 2)
minds have connections to the physical world
àwhat people feel/know/want is related
to the world around them
-occurs
b/w age 2 and 3 -
i.e. by age 3 (by not age 2) the kid knows that is an
object is hidden under a container, the person who looked knows that
the object is there and the person who didn’t look doesn’t know
that the object is there (unless told that object is there. -even though 3 /4 year
olds know that there is a connection b/w mind and physical world, is very limited
àthey
still make mistakes like: predicting:
The kind of experience
needed to know certain things
The knowledge
needed to influence a certain behavior 3)
Minds are separate and different from the physical world
-3
year olds know that the things that they fantasize about are not real
àI.e. they know that if you are thinking
about a cookie, it is not real, whereas the cookie that another kid
has is.
àdecrease
in apprehension of imagined ghosts/monsters 4)
The knowledge that the mind can reflect objects/events accurately
or inaccurately
àRequires
that kid has grasped mental representation ànot there by 2 or 3
àby 4 or 5, there is clear understanding
of it
study:
-kid hears a story of a
kid who puts a candy in a blue cup. Then, while he was out, his mom moved to a green cup.
Then the kid asked where the kid in the story would look for the candy.
Result:
-3
year old: said the kid looked for candy in green cup (where it
really was)
-4/5 year olds: said the
kid looked for candy in the blue cup (where the kid
thought it was)
-->ability to consider
another’s belief, even though it is false; yet also consider how it will
affect his behavior.
Note: -Belief-reality is similar to appearance-reality
problem 5)
Minds actively interpret reality and emotional experience
-->preschoolers think that
mental representation is passively passed down
-->kids
as old as 8: everyone sees/hears the same will understand it the
same way only in middle childhood
does kid realize that person’s perception
is based on prior experiences
Communication and the decline of egocentrism
-communication is beyond words:
it is also presenting yourself correctly/clearly
-->development
of this starts in preschool period
-->marks the decline of egocentrism
Sudy –
Glucksberg/Krauss
-2 kids put at 2 ends of screen:
can’t see each-other
-had 6 blocks, each w/ a drawing
on it (see top of page 329)
-they
had to put them in the same order, using verbal skills
Results
-4/5 year-olds = failure!
-->descriptions were too
egocentric and uninformative.
I.e.:
‘a curved part of a pipe’
[ambiguous]
‘the first one’ [neither kid
could see each other and the other person’s order]
ignores the fact
than neither can see each other, as seen in this dialogue:
‘It’s a bird’ – ‘is
this it?’ –‘no’ -->while they could not see each other!! -the preschoolers
have the ability to communicate ideas verbally, quite clearly. I.e.
if you replace abstract figures of the above experiment w/ simple
shapes/colors
-->preschoolers
describe situation better
-->focus on more abstract
objects = less ability to take other people into consideration
Other studies
-kids change their tone/language,
depending on whom they speak to
change their tone
while speaking to younger kids (as seen in chapter 7)
preschoolers spontaneously
vary their classification depending on their listeners
Example: adult spilt
a cup of juice (stages accident). A week later, when asked why the cup
was empty, the answer was diff. for those who where there or not.
To find kid
’
s maximum ability: take away/limit all other cognitive demands
To find kid
’
s typical ability: place kid in environment closest to his natural environment
Limited cognitive resources and communication
scripts
-one way for preschooler to
communicate, despite limited resources/communication skills, are
scripts.
Script: an abstract representation of the sequence of
actions needed to accomplish some goal
Examples of scripts:
Going to fast-food
restaurant
Birthday party
Shopping in a supermarket -scripts are learned by direct
observation of adults
sometimes, there
is usage of
specific behaviors/phrases, but usually, only the
general behavior is learnt
script learning is more complex
than pure imitation of what one saw/heard -when speaking to adults, kids
don’t so much use scripts: they rely more on the adult’s helping
them be clear, and help ensure a smooth/clear dialogue.
Overview of preschool cognitive development
Cognitive advances during preschool years include:
Emerging understanding
of causation, especially in
simple or familiar systems
Ability to make
clear distinction between living/non living things
Qualitative understanding
of many concepts related to quantity/ability to reason about small numbers
Beginning of understanding
of classification and other logical
relationships
Gradual development
of the ability to distinguish b/w appearance and reality
Expanding attention
skills
Steadily increasing
understanding of others’ perspective and thoughts
Chapter 10
-b/w the ages of 2 ½ and 5,
there is significant de. In the following categories
Child
’s expanding world
Kid can now initiate what games
he wants to play w/ rich social interaction
Self-reliance/self-control Spends less time w/ parent àmore
w/ peers.
Initiates own social activities
Less aggressive
impulses than toddlers àless
need to constantly supervise them
Explore adult roles
I.e. kids take turns playing
the captain of a ship/cooking food/etc.
Theme of the chapter: organization and coherence of preschooler’s
behavior
Some hallmarks of early childhood social and emotional development
expanding world
self-reliance
self control/regulation
The child’s expanding world
-child spends increasing amount
of time outside home
ài.e. kindergarten/day-care.
Important
for things
like:
kid’s general adjustment
competence w/ peers
complexity of play
all of them are
influenced by the quality of play
Other social influences:
peers also infl.
things like concept of fairness/reciprocity
older siblings give
framework for dev.
can get involed w/ fantasy
play, which he can’t do w/ mother
see how to interact socially:
i.e. when to interrupt mother w/ relevant issue
Moving towards greater self-reliance
-psychoanalysts emphasize preschooler’s
sense of independent purposefulness
Erikson called it
initiative
Initiative: Erikson’s term for child’s sense of independent
purposefulness
Bandura emphasized the child’s
growing
self-efficacy
Self-efficacy: the sense of being able to do things effectively
on one’s own
àDr. Feldman: very similar!
Sel
f-reliance is supported by several capacities of 3-4 year old:
motor skills such
as climbing/manipulating obj.
allows them to do more for
themselves
language/other cognitive skills
helps them think/plan/solve
problems in a way that they could not do as toddlers
more abilities to
tolerate delay/frustrations
do a task despite obstacles/setbacks
emerging capacity for imagination/fantasy play
allows them to maintain a sense
of power in a world controlled by adults
-some children have trouble
moving towards greater independence
àneed constant adult encouragement to
do simple challenge
Instrumental dependency: a child’s normal need for adult
help in solving complex problems or performing difficult tasks.
Emotional Dependency: a child’s abnormal need for continual
reassurances and attention from adults
Self-control and self regulation
-younger preschoolers can’t
fully control themselves,
-i.e. when playing a game,
and the kids are told to only start running when I say go, and they
run after we say: ‘ready, set...’
àb/c they can’t fully inhibit their
acts
àthis
ability comes in preschool period when the kids learn to monitor themselves
Elinor Maccoby
-lists things acquired by end
of preschool period, as a result of the ability to monitor oneself/inhibit
actions/delay gratification/tolerate frustration/adjust behavior to
situation:
weigh future consequences
when deciding how to act
stop thinking of
possible ways around an obstacle blocking a goal
control emotions
when goal-directed activities are
blocked, which decreases likelihood of tantrum
concentrate: blocking
out irrelevant thoughts/sights/sounds. Focus instead on what is needed
to get to the desired objective.
do more than one
thing at a time as long as those things are not incompatible or highly
complex
threes skills are not fully
developed, but they are well on their way
Developing self
-as seen in chapter 9, preschool
period is marked by great cognitive advances.
àchild b/c aware of themselves as a
person:
they have a mind
that they are a particular
person -beginning of realization of
gender: that they are boys or girls and that one kind of parent is not
another.
Changes in self-understanding
-late in toddlers period: mental
self-concept is very primitive. Can only conceive of one concurrent
thing:
à‘
I am eating an apple’ -in preschool period, child
can move b/w various alternate experiences
-i.e. pretend to first
talk to the baby teddy bead and then to the mom teddy bear, and have
a skit that way àdue to this skill, preschooler can
therefore also ‘observe’ themselves pretending
ài.e.
watching themselves in the mirror and say ‘that’s me’
àdev.
of self concept
-but the self-concept is still
very primitive.
àthey have a hard time
realizing that they are the same person both when they’re feeling
good and when they’re feeling bad
àthey
can’t coordinate diff. aspects into a unified sense of self will wait
until later childhood/adolescence
Self-constancy and self-esteem
-self-constancy: a sense that the self endures despite
temporary disruptions in the relationships
ài.e. when internalizing
parents’ rules, challenging them (and feeling guilty) and then reaccepting
them, and thus harmonizing w/ parents -
i.e. a 3 year old kid will intentionally pull cord even
when mom is there and he knows that she doesn’t want him to do it. àthe
child expects that scolding response. He knows that he can remake
the harmony relationship by apologizing
àjust like the concept
of
reversibility in chapter 9
àthis
allows him to understand the continuity of the self, in relationship
to him mom -preschoolers start thinking
of themselves as having dispositions which are consistent over time.
àbut each preschooler’s
view of the self is diff., depending on the his own development.
Self-esteem: positive thoughts and feeling about the self
àmost kids see themselves as likable/competent/efficient
Gender and the Self
-gender is a main organizing
theme in development.
àchild
learns gender-appropriate roles/behaviors
àcultural stereotypes regarding each
gender
àthis
learning starts early and is pervasive
Manifests itself in child
’
s:
activities
preferences
social styles -gender is so salient in preschoolers
that they even begin to label objects/activities terms of gender
àchildren remember better activities
when they are ‘
gender-appropriate’ -gender is a key in preschooler’s
emerging self concept:
-being
a girl or boy is a central definition of the self
3 steps are involved in
gender-based self-concept adaptation to
sex-typed behavior
actions that conform to cultural
expectations about what is apprioriate for boys/girls
simultaneously,
acquire
gender-role concepts
Knowledge of cultural stereotypes
regarding males/females
lastly, child acquires emotional commitment to their particular
gender, which is part of the process of identification w/ parents
Changes in Sex-Typed Behavior
-the development of sex-typed
behavior occurs in steps.
by age 2, children
already have gender-related preferences in toys
Boys: trucks/cars
Girls: soft/cuddly toys
This kind of
learning probably comes from imitation and reinforcement
-the children still
have a very primitive understanding of gender-related behaviors. They
still don’t understand the broader categories of gender. àthey
only understand that certain objects go w/ mom [lipstik] and others
w/ dad (neck tie) by age 3-4 they know much more about gender-appropriate
objects and activities
categorical thinking of what
is a male/female.
-in US, even babies are differently
dressed
room decorated
toys
diff. relation àdifferential treatment
increases in preschool period
Judith Langlois
àgives preschoolers gender-
inappropriate toys to plays w/
ànegative feedback
Developing Gender-Role Concept
-by age 4 or 5, children begin
to learn more abstract cultural beliefs about gender diff.
cognitive maturation
continued/increased
gender-role reinforcement
dev. of more general/abstract
ideas about gender roles
Child increasing general
gend
er concept includes:
Males:
aggressive
self-confident
ambitious
Females:
emotional
kind
interpersonal sensitivity -more more extensive list,
see bottom of p.345 àthose
gender-role concept start to form by 3, but are this extensive by age
5
Child sees
gender roles as:
Men have a more
instrumental role
Women have a more
expressive role -gender-concept encourages
a strict gender segregation in classroom/playground
àchildren prefer to play w/ kids of
the same gender
àthey
know what gender category they’re in.
àshow
negative emotions towards the other gender and positive emotions to
their own emotions
Rare cases
-children w/ ambiguous gender-organs
who are brought up as the wrong gender
àcan be reversed by 2½
àafter the toddler period,
the child has passed the critical point and will keep on thinking of
himself as the gender he was originally brought up as
Understanding gender-consistency
Gender-consistency: the understanding that gender is permanent
despite superficial changes -connected to appearance-reality
problems, 3 year olds know that they are boys or girls, but do not know
if they change behavior (i.e. boys wearing dresses), produce gender
diff. -how early children show gender-constancy
is diff. depending on how it is assessed
i.e. study:
-preschoolers asked to draw
a boy/girl. Then the experimenter add a feature to make look like the
other gender. Most preschoolers agree that the drawing is now the other
gender Could possibly be
b/c child assumed it was only a picture and one could change the picture at will
Study #2
Sandra Bem
-3-5 year olds shown pictures
of nude infants. Then showed same kids w/ sex-inappropriate clothing
Results:
almost ½ the boys/
over ½ girls knew that there is no diff. in the kid
virtually said no,
if asked if their gender would changed if they
changed dress-style
¾ knew the diff. b/w male/female
genitals
Explaining sex-typed behavior and gender-role development
-various explanations for sex-type
behavior/gender-role concepts
Social-learning theorists: reward-and-punishment
experienced by children for appropriate and inappropriate behavior
Cognitive theorists: children’s emerging
understanding of categories/scripts/schemas
Beginning of understanding
of roles as gender category of either male or female
Gender-schema theory: combines
social
learning and
cognitive
Children form cognitive schemas,
but based on social experience
psychoanalytical theory
: emphasizes developmental change in relationship w/ parents.
In striving to be like the parent of the same gender, they adopt same
behaviors/attitudes
note: this theory might have some cognitive elements to it, since
the kid does need to recognize his gender and similarity to one parent
over the other
variation of psychoanalytical: (C
hodorow) boys define their masculinity in terms of distance from mother,
whereas girls define themselves by similarities to mother.
boys identify
themselves in terms of separation/individual qualities
Girls: seek similarity in people
Social Development: the new world of peers
by age 2 –rudimentary signs of turn-taking
they might say a word/show
something to peer, wait for response and then repeat
preschoolers’ social interaction s now
b/c coordinated and sustained , due to linguistics skills
can actually make up games/rules/fantasy
games/novel procedures/etc.
Competence w/ peers
-social competence complex
measure
-can’t measure purely how
much contact kid as w/ others
could be aggressive
contact
could be asymmetrical (i.e. always the
followers)
large # of contacts
doesn’t imply competence
sometimes, playing
alone also doesn’t imply a social problem
that is diff. from hovering
near kdis and not being able to join -you need to combine measures,
i.e.
engage/reaction to peers w/ positive
feelings
are of interest/highly
regarded by peers
can sustain a give-and-take
interaction
able to leas as
well as to follow
will be judges by
teacher/observer as socially competent
usually, social measures are
in agreement w/ each other
they foster each-other.
I.e.
Early Friendships
-not only do preschoolers prefer
certain friends to play w/ over others, but this relationship could
last over a year!!! (as seen in observational studies)
Factors:
Parents promote/encourage
it
Seeing the kid every
day in preschool àby
age 4, kids have ability to maintain friendships by themselves -preschooler show different
behaviors / friends than w/ non-friends
cooperate in problem-solving
tasks
more positive exchanges -when put in an experimental
conflict situation (i.e. new game, each one told diff. rules):
more conflict b/w
friends
but less heated
end in fairer results
doesn’t cause the kids to
separate
they have a clear
motivation to remain friends
àbeginning
of learning to be together despite conflict -sharing might be the beginning
of sense of justice
Importance of peer relationships
Social relationships teaches
kids:
fairness
reciprocity
cooperation
manage interpersonal
aggression
cultural norms (i.e.
gender-roles)
helps kid establish
self-concept -peer interaction is the best
predictor of later success, b/c it measures things like:
level of adjustments
psychological problems
school achievements
Potential ways to help socially
isolated kid:
Increased social
interaction also helps kids overcome developmental problems
ài.e. socially drawn
kids who get to interact w/ younger kid, on a 1-to-1 basis, he will
b/c more socially involved
àgives
child the change to b/c it enhances social skills/confidence in peer
relations Hook kid up w/ kid
of same peer group who is patient but socially competent
Have teacher teach
kids social skills
Emotional Development
-since all areas of development
are inter-related, emotional development would also be as significant
as social/cognitive development of the preschoolers
Young children’s understanding of Emotion -by preschool age, kids know
a lot about emotion/emotional expression
by age 6, expansion of words/emotional concepts
to include concepts like:
sad/jealous/proud/embarrassed -preschoolers are able to interpret
positive feeling that others express almost as well as adults
àbut not negative emotions expressed -preschoolers have a difficulty
distinguishing b/w what people
really feel and what they
appear to feel
àthey can distinguish b/w happy/sad
face pictures
àbut
they can’t understand that one who is happy may not appear to be happy,
and one who is sad could put on a sad face
à
Appearance-reality problem -in preschool period, kid starts
to understand causes of emotion:
àby age 4, kids understand
that causes are not only what really happened, but also what people
expect/think happened
à
example: if a kid mistakenly thinks he’s not going to get the prize
àbut
if this kid doesn’t look sad, the observing preschooler would be confused -only by age 5-8 do kids start
to combine situational cues and visible emotional expression to infer
someone’s feelings
Growth of Emotional Regulation
Emotional regulation: the capacities to control and direct
emotional expression/maintain organized behavior in the presence of
strong emotions/be guided by emotional experiences
Tolerating Frustration
-important skill: not to get
out of control out of frustration.
-this skill begins at age 2
and develops drastically during childhood
more constructive
responses, i.e. seeking help
less angry/tantrum
prone
stay engages in
problem despite frustration
use of negotiation
to solve conflict -this change affects relationship
w/ parents
àmuch decrease defiance b/w age 2-5
Delay of gratification: the ability to forgo an immediate
reward in favor of a better reward at a later time
àa form of toleration of frustration in preschoolers,
they can do it w/ adult help
By middle childhood, child can
delay gratification by themselves -->researchers are not sure
why this dev. happens in this stage of life
Possibly, that us when kids
learn:
To repress feelings
Strategies to limit
the tension-build up that occurs during frustration
I.e.: study: kids see a toy
that is locked up in a glass box: their frustration is diverted when
they distract themselves by doing something else
Showing flexibility in emotional expression
-preschooler’s ability to
self-control emotions varies b/w kids
Ego resiliency: the ability to modify self-restraint to
adapt to changing conditions
-i.e. in the kindergarten:
in one situation, the kid stands quietly in line. In another situation,
he runs wildly in the playground
-->i.e.
self-reserved vs. spontaneous/expressive in some situations
Internalizing Standards
Internalization: incorporation of standards of behavior
into the self.
-->socialization
-->after internalization,
kid will follow parents’ prohibition even when they are not there
-->i.e. if experimenter
tells kid to do something against his parents’ will, he’ll show
distress. -->then confess to parents -->they
also seek reperation for mishaps -
internalization: the bridge b/w being controlled by others and self-regulation.
-->also
affects moral development
Robert Emde:
stages of development of moral self 3-year-olds know
that some actions are right and others are
4-year-olds see
moral transgressions (i.e. not sharing/hitting) as worse than
conventional transgressions (i.e. eating w/ fingers)
-->they make such judgments
more independent of adults than younger kids
-->knew have not only internalized
a certain behavior, but a sense of moral obligations
Progression of socialization:
Direct (‘don’t hit’)
Implicit external
controls (‘You’re a good boy for
letting Bob play w/ your boat’)
Encourage self-regulation (‘I am counting on you
to divide the cookies fairly’) -encouraging self-regulation
requires reasoning/persuasion
-if parents show consistently
fair behavior/explicit information about rules, then kids will more
likely to behave responsibly in their absence
Self-Evaluative Emotions
-internalization (socialization)
affects preschoolers’ emotional experiences
-->genuine
pride/guilt
-->diff. from toddlers’ shame/pride
Diff. b/w Toddler and Preschoolers
’
emotions
preschoolers feel
it b/c they know that they did something wrong
-->not b/c their parents are angry
preschoolers: not
b/c they fear punishment, but rather b/c of undermining of self-esteem
b/c of not living up to
internal standards
i.e. happier when solving complex
than simple tasks -->compare the task to internal standards!
Preschoolers: not
global feeing, but rather associated w/ a certain action
I.e. happy if they find the
solution themselves
Emotional Development/Aggression/Pro
Aggression: Forceful, negative acts directed against others
or their possessions
Prosocial Behavior: Positive feelings and acts directed
towards others w/ the intention of benefiting them.
-->both
connected to emotional regulation
-->we expect to see both in child’s
development -in prosocial behavior, you
must know to set your desires aside and take other’s desires into
consideration
Development changes in Aggression
-true aggression: intent to
cause physiological/physical harm
àneeds the cognitive ability to know
the consequence of actions -in toddler period: anger at
constraints by parents àas well as negative behaviors towards
peers.
àthis kind of behavior peaks in toddler
period and declines into middle preschool
-in the early preschooler period,
this attitude is object-centered (to get the toys from the peer) -in preschool period: development
of fairness: decrease in aggression
àacts of aggression àincreasingly
only to cause the others
-by
this age àconsistency
of level of aggression -as development occurs in preschool
period: alternatives to aggression
àdecrease in
instrumental aggression
à
but not in
Hostile aggression
Instrumental aggression: Aggressive as a means to get
something
Hostile aggression: aggression aimed solely at hurting
someone else
àwhen the child perceives that their
right has been violated/egos threatened -by middle change, hostile
aggression changes dramatically to more verbal aggression.
Development of Empathy and Altruism
Empathy: the ability to experience the emotions of other
people.
Altruism: the unselfish act aimed to help someone else àboth
empathy/altruism develop parallel to aggression
àsame cognitive processes underlie it:
the kid must understand that
he is an independent agent of his own action
they can cause feelings in others that are diff. from
theirs
Researchers: 3 stages of
development of empathy
Primitive capacity for empathy
: Infancy: crying when other is distressed
8-month-old will go to seek
contact w/ mom àno actual knowledge of who’s really
upset
there is no clear
distinction b/w self and other at this stage
More purposeful helping behaviors
child
might hug crying baby/bring favorite toy/mom to baby
in reality, it is not the what
is helpful to the situation: they bring their
own favorite toy/mom to the scene
the capacity to take the perspective of the others and to respond
to others
’ need
early childhood/preschoolers
actual acts of helping are
rare, though they have the capacity to feel for the other
Study:
Radke-Yarrow: -child
needs a nurturing caregiver -->who gives empathic support to others
-->parents need to
show a model of empathy -parents must likewise also
explain kids
The emotional consequences for
the victim
Expectations of
kindness
Convey entire message
w/ intensity of emotions about the issue
Bowlby: infant’s security of attachment of child
predicts empathy/pro-social in preschoolers
-->kids
who experience nurturing childrearing also learn how to be nurturing -despite diff. of expression,
both genders show increase in helpful/pro-social behavior throughout
preschool
The Role of Play in Preschool Development
-lack of play –sign of extreme
abnormality
-->child will automatically
play when needs met -->child has an intrinsic motive to play
-->this
is beyond the influence of external reinforcement -play helps kids explore environment/create
new experiences
-->children
b/c active participants in their own development
Play help w/:
kids learn new skills/practice
behaviors/concepts at the edge of their capacities
trying out roles
alone and w/ other kids
expanding/preserving
sense of self
play is also an
arena for emotional expression
play is often concerned w/
important themes/feelings from everyday life
Play and mastery of Conflict:
-play is preschoolers foremost
way to deal w/ conflict/mastering frightening or painful
-i.e.
playing lost/dealing w/ ‘monsters’
-->
example: in one case, kid who was barked at by dog -->next day, she
played w/ her dolls, where in the game, a dog barks at the dolls and
she said ‘it’s OK, it won’t hurt you!’
-->this way,
the children put their anxieties into play and therefore master them -->other
issues might be things like conflict w/ parents over control -play is also a way to deal
w/ the kid’s developmental issues.
-->i.e. the issue of
power, where in real life, the kid can’t tell others what to do, but is rather told what to do.
-->in play, he can control others.
(i.e. tell kids what to do) -pretend play is a healthy
outlet for children
-->they
actively confront problems
-->gives prototype for future confrontations
-->recognizing
a conflict and dealing w/ it rather than denying it is a growth-enhancing
response -history of parental support/nurturance
can help those children fins those healthy resolutions to issues/conflicts
-->kids w/ such parents
tend to engage in fantasy play that is more flexible and elaborate/more
likely to bring negative themes to positive resolution
-
exmaple: if the issue played out is control, the game
might be of a kid who broke his leg and the ambulance comes to fix
Role playing
-playing gives the opportunity
for role-playing/cultural values
àplay
out aspirations/fears
àdressing up like adults
and behaving like themàidentifying w/ parent/gender role -cultural factors influence
the quantity./form/themes of children’s social fantasy
i.e. Orientals:
more harmonizing fantasy play
N.A. kids àmore
conflict based fantasy play -more fantasy play that is
flexible/elaborate: is seen judged better by teachers
àfantasy play shows the overall adjustment
quality of kid
The Parental Role in Early Childhood Development
-social/emotional development
is influenced by past history/current preschool development
Important aspect of parenting in the preschool period
Erkison: preschoolers might strive to master too much
for their abilities
àif parents ridicule/punish
kid for his failures àkid might develop pervasive negative
feelings -parents must neither push
kids too far or thwart their efforts -Parents must also show consistency
and values in their own acts that they want to pass on to their kids
àsame as in toddlers, just w/ more mature
kids
Characteristics of parenting:
Authoritative parenting: A parenting style in which parents
are nurturing/responsive/supportive
Permissive parenting: A parenting style in which parents
fail to set firm limits or to require appropriately mature behavior
of their children
Authoritarian Parenting: A parenting style in which parents
are unresponsive/inflexible/harsh in controlling behavior
àassociated w/ frustration/apprehension àmight
be b/c of physical punishment or other parenting tools used [àchart of task of parents’ vs. kids] -diff styles of parenting are
appropriates in diff. contexts
-authoritarian
parenting: more predominant in inner-city/dangerous neighborhood
-consequences are not clear, but some
studies show it has positive effects:
àpossibly
b/c those kids see it as care/support and not rejection -Less successful styles of
parenting can be associated w/ negative situations in the parents’
lives: high level stress/marital conflict
àkids are very vulnerable to parents’
conflict
àleads
to higher levels of behavioral problems/negative play w/ peers/anxiety
about parents’ whereabouts àthe
particular effects on children may depend on the form of marital conflict
experienced
Mutually hostile
parental interaction associated w/ aggressive behavioral patterns
Father is angry/withdrawn
= associated w/ anxiety -Divorce may also have a negative
effect on preschool kids: they are able to grasp the anger/incompatibility
b/w parents
àbut they are not mature enough to grasp
that it is not their fault
à3½
-6 àself
blame is rampant.
àin
divorce b/f that =kid is too young to cognitively take such an assumptions
Identification w/ Parents:
Identification: The process by which children strive to
be like their parents in thoughts/feelings/actions
ànow, not only does the
kid influenced by parents’ actions to them, but also how they are
in general
àbased on kid’s relationship
w/
both parents
Process
:
-i.e. kid sees his new-found
abilities àthinks
he’s all-powerful
àbut
in contrast, he comes into conflict w/ parents’ restraints
àhas
to recognize that they are more powerful than he is
àso
as a resolution, the kid
identifies w/ parent
àtakes on their characteristics and
tries to be like them -this process starts at around
3-3½
àkid shows more cooperation w/ parents -kid needs to
understand parents’ attitudes ànot just observe them
àcomes only after the cognitive advances
of the preschool period
comes hand in hand
w/:
Development of inter-person
aggression
Empathy
Self-regulation -cognitive readiness for the
kid to accept rules is not the whole reason for him to accept them:
parent’s love –motivational/emotional
reason
Relationship that
encourages communication
I.e. if parents overemphasize
their power in teaching rules: the kid will b/c too anxious and not
internalize it
But if parents are clear in
giving rules, kid will only b/c slightly anxious and indeed internalize
the rules -coercive parenting will lead
the kid to do the thing, but positive parenting, such as
committed
compliance will get the kid to internalize the issue -Quality of parent-child relationship
may affect the internalization of rules.
àsecurity of attachment
is related to child’s openness to socialization/identification w/
family norms/values
-
Waters: positive orientation to family rules/norms is part of child’s
secure attachment
The Coherence of Behavior and Development
Coherence of the self
-there is a logical coherence
in the characteristics of preschoolers
àclusters of characteristics go together
-the kids don’t show random
characteristics by preschool age, but rather an emergence of distinct
personalities
Some of qualities that the
infant/toddlers need is also needed in preschoolers:
Parental warmth/emotional
responsiveness/sharing of positive feelings
Children of parents who are
emotionally responsive tend to show empathy for others and engage in
pro-social behavior
Parents who accept child’s
autonomy/emotionally responsive/share positive feelings: child b/c competent
w/ peers and cooperative w/ parents
Those correlations
don’t show cause-and-effect,
but they do show parental warmth/responsiveness’ importance
-some parental qualities b/c
important in preschool:
consistency of parenting
agreement b/w parents -child’s needs/abilities
are changing àso
does parental styles
àneeds to give kid certain
autonomy, yet be able to step in, in the right times
i.e.
higher self-esteem
usually goes w/ flexible self-control and pro-social behavior/positive
feelings
more hostility usually
come w/ no pro-social behavior
kids dependant on their preschool-teachers
are generally also not so pro-social -parents have some influences
in kid’s personalities, by having consistent/logical parental patterns:
àsuch as encouraging
independent as well as being supportive of peer-group and helping initialing
social events for their kids
Coherence of behavior over time
-there is logic in child’s
preschool behavior as well as development over time
ài.e. secure attachment
in infancy usually also lead to secure attachment in preschool years -in later stages, attachment
must be measured diff. than in infancy, since the ‘
strange situation’ of brief separation won’t invoke attachment issues in preschoolers -
Everett
Waters and
Brian
Vaughn made a home observational procedure to measure
the use of parent as a base of security in preschoolers called
Attachment Q-sort.
Secure attachment patterns
-preschoolers w/ secure attachment
might vary in characteristics like social involvement or activity levels,
but they share certain positive patterns of behavior:
high self-esteem
empathic w/ friends
self reliant
more positive emotions
more curiosity
popular w/ peers
more capacity for
forming friendships than anxiously attached preschoolers
little hostile aggression/negative
emotion
though they might be assertive/use
instrumental aggression
they don’t actively seek
to injure in response to provocation or frustration
Anxious-resistant attachment:
low self-esteem
unable to sustain
the give-and-take of friendship
usually neglected by peers
not flexible self-management
great need for support/contact
w/ teachers –often hovering near them such kids are frequent targets
of bullying by other kids
Anxious-avoidant
emotionally isolated
hostile/aggressive
towards other kids, which is calculated and done even w/o provocation
i.e. when one kid said that
they have a stomach ache, this kid puncher her in the stomach. When
she said it hurt, he did it again.
Lying/blaming others/behaving
defiantly
During group activity/when
its time to go home, the child seeks in a desperate manner to get teacher’s
contact
But when upset, or the teacher
greets kid, he is rejecting
In
ternal logic stems
from general mistrust; unresolved need for nurturance arising from doubts
about availability of care in early childhood
Explaining Developmental Coherence
-some reasons for coherency
of development and behavior over time:
Parenthood style remains the same
The kid is b/c an
increasingly consistent force in its own development
I.e. some kids expect others
to be responsive to them. Others don’t
Affects how he
sees/appraises his social reality
Example
-parents and others might show
less positive emotions to a difficult child, which prompts a less positive
reaction which in turn maintains the original difficultness.
àcould
happen in a similar way in a school/kindergarten/social/peer setting -i.e. children reject an aggressive
peer, which in turn encourages him to keep on being aggressive
Stability and change in Individual behavior
-personality is rooted in child’s
history, i.e. responsiveness of care in infancy/toddler
àleads to the quality of attachment
Erikson:
Basic Trust: -the level of secure attachment relates to
a sense of self-worth/connection to others -in secure attachment, parents
built on this and are:
supporting child’s independent initiatives
promoting self-control
maintaining a clear
parental support by giving emotional support/expecting appropriate behavior
Note: quality of control predicts diff. behaviors than
quality if attachment.
Example of behaviors based
on control
attention and activity
problems in elementary school are related to parents’ failure to maintain boundary
b/w them and child and support child’s dev. of self control/management àcombination
of quality of parental control and attachment is better predictor
of behavior then either -early child experiences/temperament
do not directly infl. child’s behavior in preschool period.
ài.e. quality care could
have positive consequences, even to anxiously attached kid
-as in earlier stages of development,
stress/family support are critical factors in quality of care
-it’s been shown that cross-culturally,
measures of parental stress/social support affects the:
degree of security
of child
quality of parent-child
relationship
child’s acceptance by peers -as mentioned earlier, to move
from anxious to confident relationship could occur if single mother
finds a stable, long-lasting relationship -though personality change
is possible, it is harder as child’s personality stabilizes
In infancy, caregiver
behavior/environment are better predictors of later behavior, rather
than current behavior
But assessment of
preschoolers is a good predictor of behavior
even up to adolescence and early childhood
Developmental history is now
a factor
Personality is stabilizing
Patterns that
emerge, like aggression, b/c hard to change -even in poor conditions, some
kids seem to de well.
-even
after developmental difficulty
àdevelops
over time in a context of supportive environment -since core of self-esteem
emerge by the end of the preschool period, experiences in that period
are very valuable: -people thought that preschool
preventative programs could help kids in economically disadvantaged
neighborhoods
-only
helped temporarily, but would fade out w/ the end of the program -but there were some high-quality
programs that did help, in the long-run:
-High/Scope Perry preschool
Project: was successful b/c it was child-initiative
-also
helpful b/c parents were informed of every step and therefore knew how
they can help the kid
Class
-it is natural to have a best
friend/friends
àneed to have some hierarchical social
structure
-development of abstract concepts:
God/death
Preschooler’s attention and memory abilities
-telling kid not to hurt someone –not enough
Resilience
(Flexibility)
‘investing
in preschoolers’